Quantcast
Channel: Popular Science | RSS
Viewing all 20161 articles
Browse latest View live

Honda Tests Solar-Powered Electric-Car Charging In Remote Marshall Islands

$
0
0

Green Car Reports

Honda tests electric-car charging in the Marshall Islands

Honda is testing new electric-car charging stations in a somewhat unusual and very remote location.

It's far from the carmaker's home market of Japan, or its major markets, like the United States and Europe.

In fact, it's far from pretty much everywhere on earth.

The location in question is the Republic of the Marshall Islands, a nation comprised of 1,156 individual islands near the equator in the Pacific Ocean.

These remote islands were the site of bloody fighting during World War II, nuclear testing during the Cold War, and are now particularly vulnerable to the effects of climate change.

Beginning this week, Honda will jointly conduct testing with the government of the Marshall Islands of a solar-powered AC charging station called the Honda Power Charger.

Green Car Reports

Honda tests electric-car charging in the Marshall Islands

With support from the Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Honda and the Marshall Islands government will conduct a pilot testing program using the charging stations, and a small fleet of Fit EV electric cars.

Initial results will determine whether more widespread installation of charging infrastructure throughout the Marshall Islands would be worthwhile.

Honda notes that the Marshall Islands must import the majority of its energy supplies.

Increased used of renewable energy is meant to help the country achieve a greater degree of self sufficiency, and to reduce the energy costs associated with transportation.

Green Car Reports

2012 Honda Fit EV

So the country has an even greater incentive to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions.

For its part, Honda is laying the groundwork for a return to the plug-in car market after a brief hiatus.

The carmaker recently withdrew both the Fit EV and the Accord Plug-In Hybrid from the U.S., and neither car sold in great numbers to begin with.

Honda plans to launch a new battery-electric car and a new plug-in hybrid in 2018, but has not provided any specific information on either model.

More From Green Car Reports
2017 Volvo V90 Leaked
Tesla Owners Begin Posting Autopilot Videos
2016 Kia Optima First Drive
Tesla Autopilot: The 10 Most Important Things You Need To Know


Watch This Homemade Railgun Fire A Projectile Into A Cantalope

$
0
0
Creator With Railgun

Creator With Railgun

xtamared via imgur

Railguns scream science fiction. Hobbyists love making these rifles, which use electromagnetic forces to rapidly accelerate a magnetic metal slug before hurling it into the air. This design, by YouTube user xtamared, is hardly the first homemaderailgun, but it’s one of the biggest. Here, watch as it knocks a cantaloupe off a pedestal:

The railgun, dubbed the WXPR-1, fired that shot at around 950 joules. The contraption weighs about 20 pounds, and while it can hurl a slug into a melon, it had trouble making an impact on plywood, though the projectile itself appears to have shattered. The creator detailed his construction process on Imgur, and claims it fired a projectile at a top speed of 560 mph.

This is a homemade weapon, and anyone attempting to build such a device on their own should exercise extreme caution and follow best safety practices, including wearing goggles before firing.

Impressive as it is, don’t expect infantry of the future to carry railgun rifles. The U.S. Navy is currently developing large railguns, giving ship guns relative power and range they haven’t had since before World War I. Aircraft carriers are even replacing their steam catapults with similar-in-principle electromagnetic ones, which hurl planes into the air faster. The military potential for railguns is huge, but fortunately, a militarily useful railgun takes the kind of budget and research that only the Pentagon can undertake.

In the meantime, enjoy watching this railgun charge and fire a bolt into a cantaloupe below:

[Digital Trends]

How To Build Your Own Auto-Lacing Shoes

$
0
0

This Back to the Future Day, real hoverboards may be out of your wallet's reach. But there's one piece of tech from BttF 2 that you can buy or even make yourself: Marty McFly's auto-lacing shoes.

Back in 2010, DIYer Blake Blevin decided to recreate the "power laces" technology for an electronics contest on the DIY website Instructables. To her surprise, a video of her "crude, barely-working prototype" went viral (and was even shared on *Popular Science).

"After that," Blevin says, "I started hearing from people with disabilities." As it turns out, self-lacing shoes are good for more than nostalgia. They would be ideal footwear for those who have limited mobility in their hands—such as Blevin's grandmother, who has Parkinson's disease.

Inspired, Blevin ran a successful Kickstarter campaign to turn Power Laces into a consumer product. Now, just in time for Marty McFly's arrival in the future, her small team is finally ready to begin shipping the shoes out for beta testing. "It's definitely taken a long time," Blevin says. "We want to get the hardware out there so we can start shipping to our backers." Beta units of the Power Laces will begin shipping in limited, made-to-order batches this month, at a price of about $250. Blevin hopes to use feedback from the beta testers to improve the hardware and release a final, cheaper consumer version in under a year.

Because of these limitations, it might be tricky to get your hands on a prefab version of self-lacing shoes. But you can still make your own. Blevin has reposted her instructions for your own DIY Power Laces. In this project, an Arduino strapped to the back of the shoe monitors a force sensor in the heel. When wearers step on the sensor, the Arduino commands servo motors to turn and tighten up the laces.

A Russian Pilot Filmed An American Drone From His Cockpit

$
0
0
MQ-9 Reaper, Joint Base Balad, Iraq

MQ-9 Reaper, Joint Base Balad, Iraq

Erik Gudmundson, USAF, via Wikimedia Commons

Syria’s skies are getting a little crowded. The nation is in the throes of a four-year-old civil war, as the brutal embattled dictatorship of Bashar al-Assad attempts to fight off a large array of rebel factions, including radical militants and even ISIS. The war isn’t going well for anybody, and its drawn in foreign nations. In Eastern Syria, an American-led coalition is launching strikes against ISIS. Last month, Russia sent forces to prop-up the Assad dictatorship, and they’ve been conducting airstrikes of their own. The skies are so crowded that this happens:

That’s an MQ-9 Reaper drone, of the kind commonly used by the United States in targeted killing campaigns. The video, uploaded to YouTube by the Russian Defense Ministry today, was filmed from the inside of a Russian jet cockpit, and you can see the pilot in the cockpit’s reflection. The video is captioned simply and in English: “The presence of aerial vehicles in the air space of Syria has increased.”

To prevent their air forces from fighting each other (and perhaps accidentally provoking World War III), the Pentagon and Russia are talking to each other about “deconfliction,” or the careful art of making sure each country's airplanes don’t run into and attack each other. Just in case, it appears that the Department of Defense is advising American pilots to not react to aggressive Russian jets. In the case of the Reaper, this is easy. The pilot, remote in a control console, likely can’t even see the jet through the Reaper’s forward-facing camera, and the sensor operator is probably looking for a target on the ground. They might not even know how close the Russian plane was.

Watch the full clip below:

'Inspirator' App Will Recommend You A Bentley Based On Your Face

$
0
0

Screenshot of my own customized Bentley according to Inspirator

Bentley released its iOS app, Bentley Inspirator as a way to make choosing your very expensive car a little easier. Sometimes people can be paralyzed by choice. But if you're in the market for a Bentley Bentayga, suffer no more: Your minute changes in facial expressions are enough for the company to suggest the perfect car for you. While I'm not sure I'll ever be in the market for a Bentley, the app is free, so I gave it a try.

Inspirator, which is not currently available on Android or Windows devices, starts out by showing you a series of videos, narrated by a man with a soothing accent and lovely voice. I'm not entirely sure what he was saying, but it involved words like "inspiration" and "extraordinary." The videos transitioned between linen blowing in the breeze on a beach (which I apparently had a slight reaction to, meaning my Bentley should have a "Linen and Beluga split" hide interior), to a shot of wine barrels in a dark stone basement (and my facial response to that means I love the color Piano Black).

Screenshot from Bentley Inspirator

How does it work? Well, it accesses your device's camera to monitor your expressions as the videos play. If you move slightly out of frame (or in my case, if you move at all), it will pause the video until you re-align yourself. At the end of the process, the app explains that it analyses "subtle, muscular micro-shifts and correlates them with complex emotional and cognitive states." This sounds really complicated.

The act of using the app on an iPad is awkward, to say the least. Because of the landscape orientation of the videos, it was necessary to hold it on its side, putting the device's camera at an incredibly awkward angle. I ended up watching as I angled the tablet and leaned toward the camera. The other snag is that the videos the app showed me were mostly calming, pleasant scenes that didn't elicit any particularly extreme emotional/facial response. Though, perhaps my micro-shifts were in full swing.

Because the only car currently available on the app is the Bentayga, the customization inspired by your face is mostly manifest in leather colors, the wheel shape, a few interior details, and the paint job. Overall, I can't say I came away thinking this shiny beige vehicle was the car for me. We can imagine a future where emotion-tracking apps will be genuinely awesome and useful, but for now, this is more like a gimmicky marketing ploy.

Humans Managed To Wipe Out Species That Held On Through Past Climate Changes

$
0
0
Cave

Cave

University of Florida

Caves in the Bahamas, like this one, may hold interesting information about our planet's past climate.

Most people visit the Bahamas for the sun, sand, and sea, but some people visit the islands for the caves. Or, rather, the bones inside those caves.

In a study published in The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences researchers looked at the fossilized remains of 95 species found in a flooded cave in the Bahamas. Of that motley assortment of fish, reptiles, birds and mammals, 39 species are now extinct. How did they get that way?

The scientists found that 17 of those (all birds) died out between 15,000 and 9,000 years ago, just at the end of the last ice age. A lot was changing during that time period. Habitat was shifting, temperatures were rising and getting more humid, and sea level rise shrunk Great Abaco Island from 6,564 square miles (somewhere between the size of New Jersey and Connecticut) to just 463 square miles (the size of a county in Nebraska). But what about the other 22 species, the majority of those found in the cave?

Turns out, that's on us. Those species held on for several thousand years, surviving on a small island with limited resources. But when humans showed up around 1,000 years ago, for some reason, the animals couldn't cope with the change.

"The species that existed on Abaco up until people arrived were survivors. They withstood a variety of environmental changes, but some could not adapt quickly or drastically enough to what happened when people showed up," lead author Dave Steadman said in a statement."So, there must be different mechanisms driving these two types of extinctions. What is it about people that so many island species could not adapt to? That's what we want to find out."

Hunting and human-caused wildfires definitely played a role, but Steadman and colleagues hope to get even more specifics in the coming months. They plan to return to the Bahamas in December, and investigate other caves, looking to expand their knowledge of how some species could survive climate change, and others could survive the invasive species of humanity.

So What If The Tesla Model S Is No Longer Recommended By Consumer Reports?

$
0
0

Tesla

The stock price of Elon Musk's electric car company Tesla Motors went on steep spiral today, shedding at one point 9 percent of its value based on the news that Consumer Reports—which had awarded the Tesla Model S a 103 out of 100 points in a road test just two months ago—discovered that its reliability was, perhaps, less than stellar.

As part of its annual reliability survey—in which the magazine surveys readers about their own personal vehicles—the company found there were problems with the drivetrain, power equipment like motorized door handles, the big central touchscreen, charging equipment, and various “body and sunroof squeaks, rattles, and leaks.” A blog post from the magazine notes sums up by noting that “from that data we forecast that owning that Tesla is likely to involve a worse-than-average overall problem rate. That’s a step down from last year’s ‘average’ prediction for the Model S. It also means the Model S does not receive Consumer Reports’ recommended designation.”

The announcement goes into some specifics about what systems are proving the most problematic, but it provides no actual data. We don’t know how many owners complained about each problem, or even what percentages of vehicles showed faults. Also, there’s a laundry list of qualifiers peppered throughout the post, which notes, among other things, that all of these are covered under warranty—cheerfully covered, I might add, with a customer-service reputation that CR acknowledges is above reproach—that squeaks and rattles are more pronounced in cars as already quiet as the Tesla is, and that 97 percent of consumers would still buy another car from the company. Furthermore, the post acknowledges that Tesla is still a very young company, and that other cars from profoundly more experienced car manufacturers fared equally—or worse—than Tesla. BMW’s X5 SUV and the Nissan Leaf, for instance. What, Nissan and BMW aren’t perfect, either?

But the absence of actual data sticks in my craw. Personally, I’ve always been extremely skeptical of the true reliability of Consumer Reports surveys, and taken them with healthy doses of salt.

To begin with, the surveys are only of subscribers—in this case, covering 740,000 vehicles (not respondents—actual vehicles) owned by them. Right there, you have a self-selected group of probably pretty vocal consumers, albeit ones perhaps more attuned to product quality than that average buyer on the street. Then you have the fact that of those 740,000 vehicles, only 1,400 were Tesla Model S sedans. (There are more than 90,000 on the road currently.) No actual repair and warranty-claim statistics are factored in, and no industry data was collected. It’s straight-up subscriber feedback.

In previous years, when I’ve mulled the Consumer Reports’ methodology, this has stuck out as problematic, particularly for vehicles, which the average consumer only purchases a few times in their lifetimes. Further, the rankings always involved numbers of complaints that were in the low single digits per 1,000 respondents. So when Tesla dropped from Average to Below Average in its reliability—there are five rankings total—that could simply mean a difference of 5 or 8 vehicles having a squeak or rattle, or needing a new motor. But we just don’t know, and have to take CR’s word for it.

Of course, all of these complaints are perfectly legit—but significant enough to warrant the stock market sloughing billions of dollars of a company’s value in one day? I doubt it. But the stock market being what it is, the company could be up 12 percent tomorrow, then back down six on Thursday. I’ve reached out to both Consumer Reports and Tesla to see if I can get actual numbers of survey complaints or warranty repairs in certain categories. We’ll update if any data materializes—and if we’re talking about statistically significant numbers of cars, adjusted for the general population, then yes, that’s a problem and we’ll bitch out Tesla about it along with everyone else. Meanwhile, let’s all just take a deep breath, accept the possibility that this may indeed be a tempest in a teapot, and not lose our collective shit every three days over this company.

No Need For Time Travel: October 21st, 2015 is 'Back to the Future' Day

$
0
0

Time-Traveling DeLorean

Back to the Future, Part II

It's been nearly 30 years since Marty McFly, Jennifer, and Doctor Emmett Brown traveled to the then far-flung future date of October 21st, 2015, in Back the to Future, Part II, but viewers have eagerly awaited for the trio's arrival. The flick went to become a huge hit at the box office and more importantly, a classic among sci-fi film fans, for its zany portrayal of the paradoxes of time travel between 1955, 1985 and 2015. And social media users shared their excitement about finally reaching today without a time machine by tagging posts with #BTTFDay.

Fans recreated and quoted some of their favorite moments from the trilogy

While others reenacted the movies' most iconic scenes.

Even some scientific organizations got in on the fun

Several brands are mentioned in Back to the Future, Part II, and many of them are embracing the products seen in the film's version of 2015. At this year's New York Comic Con, Pepsi announced they would make a special edition "Pepsi Perfect," the soft drink Marty drinks in a 2015 diner. It's available online exclusively at Walmart and Amazon until supplies run out.

When Marty first arrives in 2015, he is scared by a holographic shark promoting Jaws 19. Universal Pictures made a real trailer for that movie (which exclusively lists its predecessors) just for today.

Marty also puts on a self-lacing Nike shoe, which although Nike hasn't actually made (yet), you can make yourself.

Without a doubt, the franchise's most iconic product is its time-traveling DeLorean. Though the DeLorean Motor Company went defunct in 1982 (before the first film even came out), ride-sharing app Lyft teamed up with Verizon and will send out a fleet of DeLoreans to pick up passengers in New York City tomorrow, October 21, 2015.

We here at Popular Science will be celebrating at full speed (or at least 88 mph) and wish you a happy Back to the Future Day, however you choose to celebrate it!


Sugar Maples In The Adirondacks Are Mysteriously Tapping Out

$
0
0

It is a truth universally acknowledged that pancakes or waffles of delicious fluffiness must be in want of maple syrup.

Maple syrup is the sticky glue that holds breakfast together. It's also an incredibly valuable industry, which thieves illustrated very clearly in 2012, when a group made off with $18 million worth of maple syrup from a Canadian factory. (The trial started this week). But scientists are worried that the scrumptious river of concentrated tree sap might be drying up in the Adirondacks, and no one knows why.

As a part of his master's thesis, Daniel Bishop began studying the status of sugar maples in the Adirondacks. Part of Bishop's research was just published as a study in the journal Ecosphere, in which Bishop and his co-authors found that the sugar maples' growth in the region has been declining for nearly 40 years. By looking at tree rings,

"Given their relatively young age and favorable competitive status in these forests, these sugar maples should be experiencing the best growth rates of their lives. It was a complete surprise to see their growth slow down like this," said Bishop. "But our data tells a clear story. We can detect the start of a region-wide downturn after 1970, with a large proportion of the trees continuing this trend over recent years."

In 1970, the main threat to sugar maples and many other trees in the region was acid rain, caused by air pollution from factories. The effects of acid rain on forests, mostly weakening trees and stressing the soil are well documented. But in the intervening decades, pollution controls have limited the amount of acid rain in the region, so the trees should be rebounding. For some reason, they aren't, and scientists aren't sure why. It could have something to do with the lingering effects from acid rain, or climate change, but further studies are needed to pinpoint a cause.

Don't panic and start creating your maple syrup stockpile just yet. The researchers still don't know if this slowed growth rate is just limited to the Adirondacks, or if the strange phenomenon is also in other maple-syrup-producing areas, like New England and Canada.

"Time will tell if slower growth is a harbinger of something more serious for sugar maple,"said Colin Beier, who oversaw Bishop's research. "But given the ecological, economic and cultural importance of this tree, the stakes could be high. We need to sort out whether these declines are more widespread, the reasons why they are occurring, and what their implications might be for our ecosystems and local economies."

How To Build A House That Saves The Earth And Your Wallet

$
0
0

SURE House at the Solar Decathlon

Sarah Scoles

Visitors to the competition-winning SURE House, created by students at the Stevens Institute of Technology in Hoboken, New Jersey, hang out on the porch with the storm shutter open and providing shade.

In the Solar Decathlon, a competition sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy, college teams had to design and construct full-size houses that run entirely on solar power. And because the cost of each house couldn’t exceed $250,000, the competitors mostly used off-the-shelf technology.

“This is all available today,” says Solar Decathlon director Richard King. "[The teams] take everything that’s available and try to make something creative out of it.” That means the same innovative, sustainable solutions that went into the 14 Solar Decathlon houses—which were on display in Irvine, California this month—could also make their way to your shelf, your wall, or your roof.

Solar Technology

INhouse at the Solar Decathlon

Sarah Scoles

If you’re going to go solar, you have options for which panels to use and how to position them. At INhouse, the California Polytechnic State University team used “bifacial” solar panels, which allow light to enter through both sides. The front side catches the Sun’s direct rays, while the back captures the ones reflected from the ground or roof. This type of panel costs about $500 per unit.

The STILE House team, a collaboration between West Virginia University and the Università di Roma, chose to put their solar panels on a north-south arch over the porch. The panels’ shadows provide cool shade for outdoor lounging, and their tilt means that the sun shines more effectively on different panels as it moves across the sky.

STILE House at the Solar Decathlon

Sarah Scoles

The STILE House, a collaboration between West Virginia University and Italy’s Università di Roma, is covered with an arch of solar panels.

DURA Home at Solar Decathlon

Sarah Scoles

The DURA Home, built by the New York City College of Technology, uses vertically-oriented solar panels that could fit in an urban environment.

The DURA Home, meanwhile, presents a city-friendly solution to solar panels. If you live in the middle of a metropolis—and don’t own a penthouse—you probably don’t have a roof or a porch for solar panels. So the New York City College of Technology used more versatile, stackable panels with a sawtoothed, vertical design.

Team Orange County’s Casa Del Sol upped their panels’ efficiency by 10 percent—by taking a step out of the process. Solar panels normally send DC power, which another system must converts into AC power. But many home devices, like laptops and cell phones, can use that DC power. So Casa Del Sol used a Princeton Bidirectional Inverter to provide DC power and only convert it to AC when necessary.

Water Temperature

Most conventional houses use electricity or fuel to heat water, but a number of those at the Solar Decathlon harnessed the sun’s rays directly. After all, sunshine heats up the planet, so why not use it to heat your shower? The Missouri University of Science and Technology’s NEST Home runs water over its metal roof, which heats up during the day. At the competition, where the air temperature reached 106 degrees Fahrenheit, the system proved so efficient that the water almost boiled.

NEST Home's Water-Heating System

Sarah Scoles

The Missouri University of Science and Technology’s NEST Home used sunshine to heat its water.

The NexusHaus, a collaboration between the University of Texas at Austin and Germany’s Technische Universitaet Muenchen, collects water similarly, in a canopy that shades the porch.

NexusHaus at the Solar Decathlon

Sarah Scoles

NexusHaus, a collaboration between the University of Texas at Austin and Germany's Technische Universitaet Muenchen, displays their HVAC and water systems at Solar Decathlon 2015.

The DURA Home team made use of a prefab system called SunDrum, which uses the excess heat that solar panels themselves create to warm up water and generate more electricity.

But Casa Del Sol had perhaps the most innovative solution: They captured heat with evacuated glass tubes, which cost about $10 each. Then they used this warmth to heat water, which ran through the pipes to make showers pleasant.

Air temperature

Casa Del Sol’s hot water can also flow into the house’s ceiling. There, flexible plastic tubes called PEX radiate the heat from the hot water as it runs through them. The same system can also cool the house by using chilled water. And the tubes only cost $30 to $50 for every 100 feet.

At Indigo Pine, the cooling comes from below rather than above. The Clemson University team gave their cement foundation a checkerboard middle, with open spaces. This allows the ground to passively cool or heat the air.

Indigo Pine at the Solar Decathlon

Sarah Scoles

The Indigo Pine house, from Clemson University, on display at the Solar Decathlon.

But the team from the University of California at Davis had the coolest air conditioning. The sloped roof of their Aggie Sol house funneled rainwater into a container. At night, when the air was cooler, their system fed water back up to the roof and shot it out using sprinklers. Air exposure cooled the water, and when it fell back onto the roof, it returned to the rainwater container before flowing under the floorboards to chill the house.

Aggie Sol at the Solar Decathlon

Sarah Scoles

The Aggie Sol house, from the University of California at Davis, has a sloped roof that channels rainwater and directs it into a container.

Materials

Solar Decathlon - NEST Home Materials

Sarah Scoles

NEST Home, from The Missouri University of Science and Technology, was built from repurposed materials.

Most of the houses used recycled or reclaimed materials. Like a bird’s house, the NEST Home was constructed entirely out of discarded bits and pieces. The team used wooden pallets to make the outside and shipping containers to form the interior structure.

Both the INHouse and Team Alfred’s ALF were held up by structurally insulated panels, which combined the strength of a wall and the temperature-moderation of insulation. Each square foot of paneling cost four to six dollars. The STILE House opted for a cheaper insulation (about two dollars per square foot) made of recycled denim—because those flared-leg jeans have to go somewhere.

The creators of Indigo Pine came up with a whole construction system, called SimPLY. It sent instructions to a computer numerical control (CNC) machine, which cut wood into pieces. Then this pre-cut lumber could be shipped to the construction site and snapped together, like LEGOs or Ikea furniture, sans power tools.

Indigo Pine's SimPLY System at the Solar Decathlon

Sarah Scoles

An explanation of Indigo Pine's SimPLY construction system

Green Space

Science says we’re happier when we see green space. And our checking accounts are happier if we’re not buying packages of organic cherry tomatoes every two days. The Decathletes often combined the desire for flora with the desire to eat. Students from University at Buffalo, The State University of New York centered their GRoW Home on the idea that even residents of northern New York should have vegetation year-round. Their home includes a 320-square-foot greenhouse. With a little (okay, a lot) of fiddling, a porch on an existing home could be transformed into a perennially plant-friendly environment.

GRoW Home at the Solar Decathlon

Sarah Scoles

The GRoW Home, from the University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, comes complete with a greenhouse to provide year-round vegetation.

NEST Home's Wall of Plants

Sarah Scoles

The vertical garden at NEST Home used gravity to pipe water to plants.

Hydroponic gardens also abounded. Downsloping pipes at NEST Home used gravity to water plants. The Reflect Home, created by the California State University, Sacramento, housed a vertical “living wall”—you can make your own from felt.

At ALF, the focus was on the lawn. Americans love their lawns, but the grass is always greener when you water it—a lot. Instead of wasting water, the team installed Pearl’s Premium Ultra-Low Maintenance lawn, which requires less water than succulents and captures four times as much carbon as a typical yard. A five-pound bag of Pearl's will set you back $36.

ALF's Lawn at the Solar Decathlon

Sarah Scoles

Team Alfred’s ALF had a low-maintenance lawn that required less water and captured more carbon than a conventional yard.

Weather-proofing

The airtight, waterproof SURE House, which won the gold medal at the event, uses an amazing 90 percent less power than a traditional house. Its deployable storm shutters, which act as a shade when up and also can collect solar energy, require just 20 pounds of force to pull down. The house can be totally stormproof in 45 minutes, which was important to the team, who were inspired by Hurricane Sandy.

SURE House at the Solar Decathlon

Sarah Scoles

SURE House, from the Stevens Institute of Technology, earned 951 out of 1,000 possible points to win first place at the Solar Decathlon.

The EASI House is a joint effort of Western New England University, Universidad Tecnológica de Panamá, and Universidad Tecnológica Centroamericana. It can withstand powerful, hurricane-force wind and earthquakes because of the anchors holding it to the ground.

The Crowder College and Drury University team also designed the Shelter-R3 house with a natural disaster in mind. In their case, it was the 2011 Joplin tornado. They built a modular home so it can be shipped and assembled fast. This enables it to provide power to other houses in a disaster and act as a base for rescue operations.

Shelter R3 at the Solar Decathlon

Sarah Scoles

The Shelter-R3 house, a collaboration between Crowder College and Drury University, on display at the Solar Decathlon

Each Solar Decathlon team had a different target audience in mind, ranging from the inhabitants of Tornado Alley to urban families to farm workers. But all of them hope that making their technology and innovation public will help people everywhere live more sustainably. If you can afford bifacial solar panels and bidirectional inverters, great! If not, a homemade living wall is a great place to start.

Let Your Emotions Build Your Bentley

$
0
0
Bentley Inspirator app

Bentley Inspirator app

Bentley Motors

Remember that time you kitted out your Bentley in deep black Beluga upholstery and regretted it ever after? It pains Bentley to think you might be unhappy with your choices, so they’ve created an app called the Inspirator (available in the Apple App Store) to make sure that never happens again.

The Inspirator is programmed to recognize 34 “facial landmarks,” according to the press release, especially those around your eyes and mouth. As you ponder images of surfers, equestrians, and kids swinging from tree branches, the app analyzes your facial movements at 15 frames per second. Was that a smirk? A frown?

The creators of the app gathered data from 3.4 million faces in 75 countries to make sure they knew what happy or repulsed or most other emotions looked like for as many kinds of humans as they could. This created 12 billion data points on what emotions look like as they flit across our faces.

As you smile or squint, the images that the app shows you change depending on your reactions. The little movie created in the process is analyzed to create a Bentley Bentayga SUV (the only model so far that uses the Inspirator) that will make you happy. You might get the Heatwave configuration with Orange Flame paint, or the dwarven-sounding Stonecutter scheme with Dark Fiddleback Eucalyptus veener in the interior. If that’s what makes you smile.

Discovered: A Brand-New Species of Giant Galapagos Tortoise

$
0
0

Chelnoidis donfaustoi Eastern Santa Cruz Tortoise

Washington Tapia

Ever since a young Charles Darwin visited the Galapagos Islands in 1835 during his circumnavigation of the globe, the archipelago has been indelibly linked with the theory of evolution by natural selection. The incredibly specific and varied adaptations of species present on each island provided some of the basis for Darwin’s theory. Yet, despite heavy study since, the islands are still offering up surprising examples of evolution in action, and among some of its most famous inhabitants no less: the giant Galapagos tortoises. On one island, researchers have discovered a new species of giant tortoise: a master of disguise long presumed to be a species it is not.

The giant Galapagos tortoise is the largest tortoise on earth, weighing between 350 and 500 pounds, and stretching 5 feet in length. It’s also incredibly long lived, reaching 100 years of age in the wild. The oldest known tortoise lived in captivity until the ripe old age of 175. These giant lumbering creatures, free of predators and competition, are the key herbivores of the islands, grazing on shrubs, cacti, grasses, and berries.

The taxonomy of Galapagos tortoises has long been debated and is dizzying to decipher. The advent of genetic studies, however, has finally put an end to most of the scientific rigmarole. There are 14 named species of Galapagos tortoises (15 including the newest one), 4 of which are extinct. They are, by and large, distributed one species per island throughout the archipelago. Which makes the discovery of a new species by ecologist Gisella Caccone of Yale University and a large team of researchers significant. The new tortoise species they named resides on the same island as another species

Santa Cruz Island

Nikos Poulakakis

Giant Galapagos tortoise species distribution on Santa Cruz Island.

The island of Santa Cruz is the second largest island in the Galapagos and is about 380 square miles in size. It contains two populations of tortoises—one that resides on the southwestern part of the island, known as the “La Reserva” group, and one on the eastern part, about 12 miles away called the “Cerro Fatal” group. The Reserva group is a bit larger, with 2,000-4,000 individuals to Cerro Fatal’s few hundred. Tortoise species on other islands differ in size, carapace (shell) shape and length of necks, but physically, these two don’t appear to be that drastically different despite some slight differences in carapace shape. Ecologist Nikos Poulakakis of the University of Crete, coauthor of the study, notes that the Cerro Fatal tortoises have more compressed carapaces than the elongated carapaces of the Reserva tortoises.

Genetically, however, it's another story. Significant genetic distinctiveness between the two groups is what ultimately led Caccone and her team to conclude they were separate species. In fact, the Reserva and Cerro Fatal tortoises are among the most genetically divergent species within the archipelago. Both populations were previously considered to be Chelonoidis porteri (the species of the Reserva group), but it became clear that the Cerro Fatal were a different species, which they’ve named Chelonoidis donfaustoi.

The question then is how these two distinct species came to be on the same island. Caccone thinks that the two likely arrived at different times. “Santa Cruz was not colonized once,” she says. The Reserva tortoises are descendent from a much older lineage of tortoise and came to Santa Cruz, perhaps just a few individuals at first, on floating rafts of vegetation. Sometime later, the Cerro Fatal species arrived. The two species remained separated on the island because of geography and climate. The Reserva tortoises flourished at higher elevations in a more humid, cloud-forest environment, while the Cerro Fatal found their niche in the more dry, lower elevations.

Chelnoidis donfaustoi Eastern Santa Cruz Tortoise

Gisella Caccone

The giant Galapagos tortoises have undergone some significant upheaval since humans first arrived at the islands in the 1500s, plummeting from as much as 250,000 to as little as 3,000 in the 1970s. Hunting, agriculture and intense competition from invasive animals like rats and feral goats all contributed to their decline. Intense captive breeding and conservation efforts have caused their numbers to rebound to almost 20,000, but their status remains vulnerable. Caccone hopes that the formal naming and description of this new species—which numbers only around 250 individuals—can help promote efforts to protect and restore it. Especially considering its geographic range and population size make it extremely vulnerable to threats and pressures.

As for the naming of the new species—C. donfaustoi—Caccone and her team decided to name it after Fausto Llerena Sanchez, known around the islands as “Don Fausto,” a Galapagos park ranger and caretaker of captive tortoises who worked tirelessly for the park and giant tortoise conservation for 40 plus years—a “silent hero” as Caccone calls him. “I felt it time to recognize the people of Ecuador and the Galapagos who have worked so hard to protect these tortoises,” she says.

Don Fausto with C. donfaustoi

Washington Tapia

Ranger Fausto Llerena Sánchez poses with a tortoise representing the species that was named in his honor.

What Would You Do With A Real Hoverboard?

$
0
0

Universal Pictures/Back the the Future, Part II

Marty McFly rides a hoverboard

October 21, 2015, is Back To The Future Day, the day Marty McFly travels 30 years into the future to 2015, in 1989's Back to the Future Part II (set in 1985, stay with us)! Marty famously rides a hoverboard in the film, but we're all still waiting to freely fly around here in the real 2015. Leave it to Twitter, though, to let the world know what it would do if users had hoverboards by tagging tweets with #IfIHadAHoverboard

Some tweets had replicas of Marty McFly's hoverboard

Though one featured his actual hoverboard, signed by actor Michael J. Fox

A surprising number of tweets also had pictures of dogs (though not all of them were real)

Many also included the mobile scooters now being referred to as "hoverboards"

Of course if you're in space, you don't need a hoverboard to float around

What would you do with a hoverboard? Let us know by tweeting @PopSci! And check out all our coverage of Back To The Future Day here.

Nike's Self-Lacing Sneakers From 'Back To The Future II' Are Real

$
0
0
Back To The Future's Power Laces

Back To The Future's Power Laces

Nike

In the 1989 hit move Back To The Future Part II, our protagonist Marty McFly travels to what was then the strange and distant future day of October 21, 2015, encountering all sorts of strange modern technologies, like hoverboards, dog-walking drones, and Nike shoes that lace themselves up That’s today, and while our hoverboards are far from cinematic perfection, Nike has gone ahead and brought the shoes from the movie into real life.

Yes, that's Back To The Future star Michael J. Fox in a pair of self-lacing Nike Mags that he says will be available for the public in Spring 2016. No price has yet been released, but the announcement fulfills years of rumors and hopes from fans of both the film and the shoe company.

While Back to the Future gave the design some retro-future chic, there are real, practical applications for self-lacing kicks. Shoes that lace themselves are great for people with disabilities, who may have trouble tying their shoes. Michael J. Fox himself suffers from Parkinson's, and a letter from Nike that Fox tweeted out earlier today says money from the shoes will go to Fox’s foundation to fight Parkinson’s. That’s one condition we’d love to leave in the past.

In the meantime, there are DIY instructions for those who don't want to wait until 2016 to live in the future.

23andMe Gets FDA Approval For Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Tests

$
0
0

Box for 23andMe's direct-to-consumer genetic test.

After the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) forced 23andMe to stop marketing the health reports in its spit kits in 2013, the personal genomics company has now been approved to offer its tests directly to consumers, according to a press release posted today on the company’s website. It is the first company to have FDA approval to market genetic tests directly to consumers, without a doctor’s approval or intervention.

Not all the results offered by 23andMe are the same now as they were in 2013, as they can only run the tests that have been approved by the FDA. The service will continue to provide customers with, “the chance to find and connect with DNA relatives in a database of more than 1 million customers,” as noted in the press release.

But it’s offering some new services, too. In addition to its sleek new user interface, the company offers a genetic carrier screening, a test that can pick up on mutations that prospective parents may pass on to their offspring. The test will provide information on 36 inherited disorders, according to the New York Times. The new test will also reportedly cost $199, $100 more than it did in 2013.

Screenshot of the user-facing results page about cystic fibrosis, one of the diseases for which the company will offer a carrier screening.

Although the tests are now designated as diagnostic tools by the FDA, some experts are still concerned that the direct-to-consumer model still doesn’t provide users with enough information to truly understand their results. “While [the] FDA has approved carrier tests there still isn’t infrastructure to support the consumption of that information by consumers, and that’s where I have concerns,” Dietrich Stephan, a genetics professor at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center told the Genetic Experts News Service.

The press release didn’t mention whether or not the genetic information from new customers would be used to develop new drugs, an initiative the company announced in March.

But Anne Wojcicki, the CEO of 23andMe, wants the company’s tests to provide even more genetic information about people’s individual health risks, such as possible allergies to medication or the diseases for which they may be at higher risk, she tells Forbes. This is the sort of information that the company claimed it could give customers up until 2013, and the FDA hasn't approved 23andMe to offer it to their customers as of yet. However, with a recent influx of $115 million from investors, 23andMe will undoubtedly be looking to expand its services to satisfy consumers’ growing curiosity with their own DNA.

The contents of the kit.

Correction: this story originally incorrectly stated that the FDA forced 23andMe to stop marketing its full spit kits in 2013, when the decision actually prevented the company from marketing only a subset of its kits (the health reports). We've updated the story in copy and regret the error.


Aliens Might Just Not Exist Yet

$
0
0
Planet-Hunting Telescopes

Planet-Hunting Telescopes

The world is in a tizzy over the mysterious fluctuations astronomers are seeing in light from a distant star. While those variations could turn out to have a perfectly non-alien explanation, the excitement over them shows just how badly we want there to be other civilizations in the universe.

Now, a study published this week in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, suggests that our loneliness is only temporary. If human civilization manages to hang on for several billion years (unlikely, but we're an optimistic bunch) then we might just see other planets with other civilizations.

The researchers, from NASA's Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI), looked at the data from telescopes like the Hubble and Kepler to get a better idea of how galaxies, planets and solar systems form. Using those observations and computer models, they calculated that Earth is only in the first 8 percent of all Earth-like planets that will ever form. That's right, 92 percent of Earth-like (a.k.a. habitable, with liquid water on the surface) planets haven't even been formed yet.

"Our main motivation was understanding the Earth's place in the context of the rest of the universe," author Peter Behroozi said in a statement"Compared to all the planets that will ever form in the universe, the Earth is actually quite early."

Because it is so early, the researchers think it is highly unlikely that we are the only planet that will ever develop intelligent life. In the paper, Behroozi and his co-author, Molly Peeples, write, "assuming that gas cooling and star formation continues, the Earth formed before 92% of similar planets that the Universe will form. This implies a < 8% chance that we are the only civilisation the Universe will ever have."

Those are pretty good odds that we aren't alone. We might just need some patience to finally make first contact.

Keep Calm And Share Your DNA, Says Google Ventures CEO

$
0
0

Bill Maris at a Fortune tech conference in 2011

If you’re worried about the privacy of your genetic data, you’re standing in the way of technological breakthroughs that could drastically extend the human lifespan, according to Bill Maris, the CEO of Google Ventures. Maris founded Calico, a biotech company established by Google in 2013 that is waging war on aging.

“If we each keep our genetic information secret, then we’re all going to die,” Maris said onstage yesterday at the Wall Street Journal tech conference in California, as Bloomberg reports.

We leave our DNA everywhere we go, Maris points out. And he’s right about that—whether it’s a stray hair left on the floor, or saliva remnants on your used coffee cup, DNA-carrying cells are leaving a trail wherever you go. Someone who wanted that information could retrieve it fairly easily. “What are you worried about?” Maris asks skeptics.

It’s important to note that extracting your DNA from stuff on the street isn’t quite as easy as Maris says. DNA evidence, for example, is not very reliable.

But it’s understandable that individuals might be wary to share their DNA. People are concerned that the blueprints to their bodies and minds could be sold to the highest bidder, or that this information that they might not completely understand could be used against them by big corporations—maybe a risk for some future disease could cause insurers to reject claims for their medical treatment, for example.

Maris isn’t the only one calling for less genetic privacy. Biotech companies and government research organizations desperately need more DNA in order to better understand what kinds of mutations cause or ward off disease. With that understanding, scientists hope they can find a way to better treat illnesses and extend human life. Maris has previously claimed that research, like that going on at Google Ventures, can extend the human lifespan to 500 years. When asked about that comment yesterday, he added that 500 years is a “conservative” estimate.

“The reality is, the technology exists now to extend life and have people live healthier, happier lives," Maris said. He emphasized the need to fund genetic innovations over the desire to build flying cars, for example, as well as the obligation to share this life-extending technology with the rest of the world. He called it the “redistribution of health.” From a research perspective, his point is well taken—collecting more DNA from diverse populations might mean that medical breakthroughs are right around the corner.

The PopSci Tech Podcast Is Here

$
0
0
The PopSci Tech Podcast logo

The PopSci Tech Podcast logo

Jason Lederman/Popular Science

Pictured from left to right: Popular Science tech editor Michael Nuñez, online director Carl Franzen, and assistant tech editor Xavier Harding. We reserve the right to update this logo to a new and improved model at any time, without warning.

The Popular Science staff is full of gadget nerds (surprise, surprise). And while we are open-minded about every new product that comes across our desks, we also have impassioned and differing opinions about pretty much everything in the world of consumer tech. Some of us like iOS better than Android. Others will go to bat for the Microsoft Surface Pro. And at least one of us thinks the Texas Instruments TI-83 graphing calculator was the best gadget of all time.

Now you can listen to us analyze and opine on the latest tech news in podcast form: introducing the PopSci Tech Podcast, a weekly discussion show featuring a rotating cast of editors, reporters, experts, and other special guests.

Each episode will focus on a few different subjects to come up in tech news recently. Our conversations will be completely unscripted, and will often focus on the subjects we've reported on for the Popular Science tech section, though we won't restrict ourselves to just those topics. But no matter what we talk about, you can be assured we will be giving you our deepest thoughts and hottest takes. The first three episodes are already up on SoundCloud, all produced by Popular Sciencesocial media editor Jason Lederman and assistant editor Claire Maldarelli, and all featuring theme music from Adhesive Wombat. Have a listen now, and check back next week for more!

And if you want more Popular Science in audio form, be sure to check out Futuropolis, our new podcast about the inventions, discoveries, and trends that will shape our lives in the future.

White House Creates New Twitter Account Dedicated To Climate Change Facts

$
0
0

Continuing the Obama administration's push towards environmental reform, this week the White House launched a new social media initiative, a Twitter account called @FactsOnClimate.

The Twitter feed has only been in existence for a day, but already has over 3,000 followers.

The content of the feed is focused on climate, a topic that many people including the President find difficult to focus on for very long. It presents topics like the administration's Clean Power Plan with easily sharable quotes and images designed to make the public take notice.

The Twitter feed also seems to be a place for the administration to publicly confront comments or doubts about its climate change policy efforts;

That last tweet is in reference to the Climate Pledge announced this week, in which 81 large American companies from Apple to Xerox have vowed to green up their act over the next few years.

The pledges, and the social media push are part of the White House effort to wrangle support for concrete action at the upcoming Paris climate talks this winter, when governments around the world will discuss how to address climate change.

Did Humans Evolve Opposable Thumbs So We Could Punch Each Other?

$
0
0

Pow!

Mike Nelson/Flickr CC By 2.0

It's thought that our hands are what make us human. Combined with our big brains, our fully opposable thumbs enabled our ancestors to make complex tools to conquer the world. But according to biologist David Carrier of Utah State University, that's not all they were good for. He thinks the human hand's uniqueness was shaped, in part, so we could punch each other in the face.

Carrier introduced this off-beat hypothesis a few years ago, to much controversy. Now he and his colleagues have come out with a study that sort of supports but doesn't confirm the idea.

In the study, published in the Journal of Experimental Biology, Carrier and his team used the disembodied arms of cadavers to show something that martial artists and street fighters already knew: that clenching your fist and wrapping your thumb around your fingers reduces your chances of breaking your hand when you punch something.

Born To Fight?

Human hands are shorter and boxier than our ape relatives, and our thumbs are proportionally longer in relation to the other fingers. This gives us the unique ability to not only manipulate tools with fine precision, but also form a fist. We're the only animals that can.

We are the only animals with fists.

“Human-like hand proportions appear in the fossil record at the same time our ancestors started walking upright 4 million to 5 million years ago," Carrier said in a press release in 2012. Although the most commonly accepted theory is that we stood upright and developed opposable thumbs so we could use tools, "[a]n alternative possible explanation is that we stood up on two legs and evolved these hand proportions to beat each other,” said Carrier.

The trouble is, it's damn near impossible to determine whether our opposable thumbs evolved first and then we figured out how to make an effective fist, or whether our hands evolved for the express purpose of fighting.

Carrier and his team have proposed that fistfights might have played an important role in human evolution, with males duking it out over mating rights. The hypothesis is supported by a hodgepodge of evidence. Adults and infants tend to clench their fists when distressed, for example, and our ancient ancestors' bones show evidence of the kind of trauma that people get from barroom fisticuffs today.

Cause Or Consequence?

The proper way to throw a punch is with your fist tightly clenched, your thumb wrapped around the underside of your fingers, and striking your target with the knuckles of your index and middle fingers. But it's really hard to throw a punch properly, and even the most experienced fighters can break their hands in the attempt.

Human hands are fragile. It is easier to defeat an enemy using tools (rocks, sticks, etc.) rather than your fists--and tool use is the more commonly accepted explanation for how our opposable thumbs evolved.

Furthermore, our ape relatives have devised plenty of ways to hurt each other without the need for a clenched fist. How would a human punch stand up to the teeth and bludgeons of a chimpanzee or gorilla? We'll leave it up to you to find out. Other apes fight predominantly with their forelimbs, yet they never evolved the ability to form a fist or stand upright.

At the heart of the debate over the "pugilism hypothesis" is a deeper, older anthropological debate about whether humans are naturally violent like our relatives the chimpanzees, or more like our free-loving cousins the bonobos.

Experimenting With Cadavers

Carrier's previous research had trained fighters hitting a punching bag as hard as they could, using a variety of strikes. The scientists calculated that fist strikes carry 1.7 to 3 times greater force per area compared to slaps, and that buttressing the fist with the thumb more than doubles the hand's ability to transmit punching force.

The experiment, modeled by a living person

David Carrier, University of Utah

The new experiment builds on that study. In an email to Popular Science, Carrier explained that the metacarpal bones (the ones in your palm, that connect your fingers to your wrist) are most likely to break during a fight. The team wanted to measure how much strain is put on those bones when a punch is buttressed by the thumb versus not. Those measurements require attaching a transducer directly to the bone, which is why they couldn't do the test in living subjects.

Instead, the team bought 8 arms from two body donor programs. They stripped the hands down to muscle and tendon, and attached fishing line to some of the tendons. On the other end of the strings, guitar tuners allowed the researchers to tighten and loosen the tendons, to make the cadaver fists clench and unclench.

The team bought 8 donor arms

Each arm was arranged on a pendulum, and then swung into a weight that carried an accelerometer to measure the impact.

After comparing the strain on the metacarpals when the cadaver fists were buttressed by the thumb versus unbuttressed, the team concluded:

humans could safely strike on average with 55% more force with a fully buttressed fist than with an unbuttressed fist and with twofold more force with a buttressed fist than with an open-hand slap.

"This performance advantage of our hand proportions is consistent with our musculoskeletal anatomy being adapted for fighting," Carrier told Popular Science.

The study shows that our opposable thumbs make our fists stronger, but it doesn't prove that that's the reason they evolved.

Although it's pretty much impossible to prove whether the "pugilism hypothesis" is correct, Carrier notes that if experiments could show that if the characteristics that define humanity can be shown to impair fighting performance, then that would indicate that fighting wasn't important in our evolution.

So far the studies haven't managed to disprove the hypothesis, far-fetched as it may seem.

"Given our current understanding of evolutionary processes," the authors note in the paper, "it would be naive to suggest that the evolution of a structure with as complex a history as the human hand was influenced solely by one or two components of selection."

Viewing all 20161 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images