Quantcast
Channel: Popular Science | RSS
Viewing all 20161 articles
Browse latest View live

Why The $1.1 Trillion Spending Bill Is Good News For Renewables

$
0
0

General Electric

Offshore wind turbines

Today, Congress passed the $1.1 trillion government spending package for 2016. And among the many things tucked away inside of it was some good news for renewable energy. The spending package includes an Investment Tax Credit and Production Tax Credit for solar and wind energy.

The 30 percent ITC for solar energy will extend for three years, when it will start decreasing incrementally until it's at 10 percent in 2022. And for the wind industry, the package extends the PTC for 2016, declining incrementally each year until 2020.

Fortunereports that the extension could lead to an increase of solar installations in the "U.S. by 54 percent through 2020," and the credit for wind power might just keep America's wind boom blowing afterall.


Virtual Reality Rock Climbing, An R2-D2 That Delivers You Beer, And Other Amazing Images Of The Week

How The Original 'Star Wars' Was Covered In 'Popular Science' In 1977

$
0
0
'Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope' original poster 1977

'Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope' original poster art 1977

As republished on the official Star Wars website.

You definitely don't need the Force to know that the staff of Popular Science is a bunch of nerds, and that we've been more excited than most for the arrival of Star Wars: The Force Awakens. But that wasn't always the case. Here's how we covered the movie that started the whole saga back in 1977, Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope.

Clearly grasping the true cultural significance of Star Wars, our writer at the time, William J. Hawkins, did the sensible thing and gave the film only the scarcest of single mentions in a news blurb about Dolby theater audio (buried below a lengthier discussion of Barbra Streisand's A Star Is Born, natch).

The first mention of 'Star Wars' in PopSci

Popular Science

The first mention of 'Star Wars' in PopSci

Behold

We can only hope the Popular Science staff 38 years from now will look upon the many Star Wars articles published this year in the run-up to The Force Awakens premiere and wonder why we didn't spend more time analyzing Streisand's later career moves.

With reporting by Katie Peek.

Star Wars Episode 7: The Force Awakens - Our Spoiler-Filled Review

$
0
0

Xavier Harding

Star Wars Episode 7 Review

The Force Awakens reinvigorates life into an already beloved series

An entire decade has gone by since Lucasfilm released the final Star Wars prequel flick. But when Disney acquired the studio back in 2012, the company promised a steady stream of movies set in the galaxy far, far away to continue the story set forth in the first six episodes. Star Wars Episode 7: The Force Awakens is the first of a new era for the franchise. And we can comfortably say that this more modern take on the Star Wars film is a refreshing change, arguably the best one in recent years, and fun for the whole family.

Let the spoilers commence.

Star Wars

Star Wars Episode 7

Rey on a mission

The most fun of Star Wars Episode 7 is getting to know the new characters. We’re initially introduced to Poe Dameron—an X-Wing pilot and owner of the fan-favorite BB-8. Within moments we see how this Star Wars film sets itself apart from the other newer entries, when Poe can’t decide who should talk first: he or Kylo Ren. And in the very same scene we see a second way—stormtroopers (on screen) finally thinking and acting on their own. Enter Finn.

Storm Trooper number FN-2187 became Finn when he decided to renounce the ways of the First Order—putting to bed rumors that he was a member of the rebellion posing as a Stormtrooper. Though, throughout the movie, Finn had no problem lying to others about his rebel allies, it’s clear why John Boyega’s Finn wanted out. Episode 7’s updated version of the Imperial Army is much more terrifying than what we saw in A New Hope, Empire Strikes Back, and Return Of The Jedi, if only for the clear feelings to Nazi Germany Disney is choosing to evoke. Turning a new leaf, Finn helps Poe escape—beginning the best bromance in The Force Awakens. But a crash landing of their ship has them once again returning to the desert planet of Jakku where we meet another new, yet important, character: Rey.

You may have seen Finn wielding a lightsaber in the promotion material for Star Wars Episode 7, but one of Force Awakens best kept secrets is the force-user in this new group. Only towards the end of the movie do we start getting hints that Rey might be a bit more powerful than we have been led to believe. Confirmation comes directly after hints as Rey learns how to use Jedi Mind Tricks and the force’s telekinetic powers all too quickly. But we’ll chalk it up to her fight-or-flight responses kicking in.

Star Wars

The First Order

The First Order seems markedly more evil than the Imperial forces of previous movies

There are no heroes without villains, of course, and Kylo Ren majestically fills that role. Han and Leia’s son Ben also demonstrates that he has a powerful command of the force, using techniques we haven’t seen on-screen before and powers we don’t fully understand. The Sith shows he can, in a sense, freeze time in an area to stop people and even laser blasts. Ren also shows that he can read people’s feelings and possibly even thoughts when offering his entire focus. While many fans were confused as to the practicality of his lightsaber with a light-hilt, using it to his advantage in the duel against Finn’s traditional saber proved its usefulness.

Star Wars Episode 7: The Force Awakens will be known for the many occurrences that fall in-line with the original movie that first premiered in 1977. A scene early on trusting a droid with a secret message? Check. A desert planet containing our main character force-user with parents of mysterious origin? Check. A “that’s no moon”-sized ship capable of destroying planets? Check. However Force Awakens will be known just as much for its differences.

The humor found in the movie’s dialogue from Finn, Rey—and almost everyone, really—has a Whedon-esque touch that I appreciated. Small changes like seeing different angles beneath and next to imperial starships during transitions led to some beautiful eye-candy. And a broader color palette of racial backgrounds is a welcome change from the original movies’ “White People and Lando” theme. The actors in this movie are a nice balance of newer names like Boyega and Daisy Ridley, as well as older favorites like Game Of Thrones’ Gwendoline Christie, Lupita Nyong’o, and even Daniel Craig, Bill Hader, and Ben Schwartz. Seeing Adam Driver’s face as Kylo Ren added a nice touch to the ominous figure impersonating the persona of his Grandpa Anakin. While removing the mask humanized Ren as the troubled son of Leia and Han, I couldn't help but feel like I was watching a Girls episode when suddenly Driver’s normal voice and face were revealed.

Star Wars

Star Wars 7

Finn wields Luke's lightsaber

More important than what this film has shown us is what it has left to reveal. Kylo Ren is set to receive added training in the ways of the Sith. Which he needs, apparently, seeing as he can’t take down foes with literally no training in how to use a lightsaber. But Rey, too, will receive training from the legend himself, Luke Skywalker. And Luke will have the honor of training the first female jedi and main character to grace the big screen (sorry Ahsoka, you were close). Who better to train her than Kylo’s Uncle Luke—once again placing emphasis on the importance this one family has to the Star Wars universe. Episode 7: The Force Awakens is a wild ride bound to please any Star Wars fan. But perhaps the best parts of Disney’s introduction to its version of Star Wars are the questions that remain unanswered.

Seven Ways Technology Will Make The Mall Of The Future Not Suck

$
0
0

Wikimedia Commons

'Tis the week to frantically finish your last-minute gift shopping. Whether you’re trolling Target or scrolling Amazon, it can be a pain.

Luckily, big data and a bunch of savvy psychologists are here to help. They're figuring out novel ways to track your in-store behavior, anticipate your needs, and help you find exactly what you need—or a pretty nice trade-off if it's no longer available.

Leading that charge is Ray Burke. He directs the Customer Interface Laboratory at Indiana University and has spent years analyzing shopping habits. “Those security cameras you see when you walk into a store?" he says. "They’re not just to prevent shoplifting. They're also used to understand traffic patterns, to see which products are most engaging, and to measure the queue length at checkout.”

Part Big Brother, part a necessity of convenience, and part bottom-line retail booster, here are the seven technologies that are helping—or will one day help—save your holiday sanity.

1. Tracking Eye Movement

Plenty of stores have replaced static cardboard posters with LCD graphics and audio. But, “as you're looking at the sign, the sign’s looking back at you,” Burke says. They're not following you, per se. They are measuring how many people walk past, how many stop, and which parts of the sign catch their eye. Pair that with high-resolution cameras, and these set-ups can be sophisticated enough to make out your gender, general age, and even ethnicity, which gives retailers lots of insight about their customer demographics and what they might want.

“Those security cameras you see when you walk into a store? They’re not just to prevent shoplifting.”

2. Taking The Pressure Off

A clothing store at the mall was struggling because fewer men came into the store than women, and those men bought fewer things. The store owners asked Burke to figure out why. He installed a panoramic video camera on the ceiling, with a 360-view, and discovered two problems. “We saw men pick up pants and shirts and then struggle to fold them and put them back on the shelf in the same way," he says. That makes men reluctant to pick them up in the first place. "So we thought, ‘We can make it easier for them. Instead of doing the normal crease fold, we just folded the product in half and put it on the shelf.” Second, they confirmed what everyone already knows: Men struggle to put together outfits. "So we created displays that showed assembled outfits, not by some stylist but by the things real men were actually buying,” Burke says. Those two changes increased interaction with the displays by 80 percent and increased sales by 40 percent. “We didn’t change the assortment of products; we didn’t change the prices," he said. "All we did is do a better job of connecting what’s in the mind of the shopper with what’s physically available in the store.”

3. Getting Out

For customers, getting out of a store is as important as moving around in it, and stores know that. They don't want you jammed into a cashier line getting frustrated and associating that frustration with their brand. Kroger, the grocery chain, has used cameras to measure how long its customers had to wait in line. By monitoring that and opening extra checkout lines as needed, the company has been able to cut wait times from about 4 minutes down to 30 seconds. Other retailers have increased the network connection speeds for their credit card readers. They have been able to increase sales on busy shopping days like Black Friday by 50 percent, Burke says, just by speeding up the processing. That can make all the difference. “The checkout lane is the last experience a shopper has in the store,” he says. “It colors your whole perception of the shopping experience.”

Grocery aisle vision

Ray Burke/Indiana University's Customer Interface Laboratory

Visions in the Grocery Aisle

Burke's lab analyzes where shoppers' eyes go as they're pushing their cart down the grocery aisles.

4. Monitoring Moods

People spend when they’re in a good mood, especially impulse buys. Ask Walt Disney: Disneyland visitors buy all kinds of useless, overpriced souvenirs just to recall how much fun they had had at the Kingdom. But when you're in a bad mood, you're not making impulse buys. You're just getting what's on the list and getting out. For retailers, Burke says understanding these physical and psychological states is critical. But how does the seller do that? “Let’s say that you’re wearing a smart watch that can measure your pulse rate," Burke says. "If it's set it up to share information with a retailer, we could use it to know on a second-by-second basis how excited you are.” Smartphones, too, can stand in for a mood ring. “If we’re able to track what music you listen to on your device that might give us insight into your mood," he says, "and we could tailor the message to better connect when you're feeling good."

5. Instant Gratification

Getting things fast—whether you order online, over your phone, or choose an appliance on a showroom floor—is the mantra in today's retail. Amazon is experimenting with drones deliveries. But eventually, says Burke, delivery may come in the form of an electronic transfer. “You can have products electronically delivered via your 3D printer,” he says.

6. Fuggedaboutit

Some stores literally want to do the shopping for you. A company called Stitch Fix, collects background on you—fashion tastes, lifestyle, budget—and sends you five personalized items on a recurring schedule. You keep what you want and send back the rest. Over time, with your feedback, the company learns your preferences so well that their personal stylists anticipate your every sartorial need, and sells you things you didn’t know you needed (or wanted) in the first place.

The stores of the future want to do the shopping for you.

7. Sharing, Not Buying

Shopping is an inherently consumptive process. It’s all about buying. But Burke thinks we are, and should continue to, move away from that model. He gives the example of a shoe stretcher he recently purchased for his wife. They used it to solve the problem of the too-small shoe, but then had no need for it. “Now what am I going to do with a shoe stretcher?! Do I return it? Well, no I’ve actually used it.” His options were to toss it in the closet, or try to sell it on Ebay or Craigslist (which likely would have been a tough sell). Instead, he wishes he could have rented one and sent it back post-stretch. Burke thinks sharing services are the future. The success of companies like Uber and Airbnb are proof of that. “I think we're seeing a trend towards a sharing economy, where through technology it’s becoming practical to use products just for a period of time that we need them and then return them.”

The Best Science And Tech Images Of 2015

An iOS 9.2 Jailbreak For iPhone Could Be On Its Way

$
0
0

Flickr Creative Commons / Microsiervos

iOS 9.2 Jailbreak Could Be On Its Way

A new version of the untethered jailbreak tool could come soon to iOS users

When the iOS 9.0 untethered jailbreak hit the web, iPhone and iPad users got their first taste of using special apps on Apple’s latest mobile operating system. However, those who have left their jailbroken phones un-updated are stuck on the older version of the iOS, while 9.2 users are up-to-date but stuck on stock iOS. This may change soon for jailbreak fans.

According to Superphen’s Tech Blog, an iOS 9.2 jailbreak may make its way to us via the Chinese hacker group 3K Assistant. The rough translation of 3K’s post claims the group has been working towards creating an iOS 9.2 untethered jailbreak. While they may already have a working version, a useable tool has yet to be made public. But the group asks that potential jailbreak users running Apple’s latest software remain patient.

While the original posting has been pulled from their site, a screenshot of the announcement exists on Superphen here.

With Apple continually adding more features to its mobile OS—and even baking in select jailbreak apps into the stock experience—the reasons to jailbreak become fewer as the years go by. But select apps and tweaks make opening up one’s iPhone still worth it. Tweaks like color-altering f.lux make reading your screen later in the day easier. BioLockdown gives users the ability to prevent chosen apps from opening without authenticating a thumb print first. And adding in gestures throughout iOS by way of Activator still has no match in the default version of iOS.

On the other end of the spectrum, jailbreak users running an older version of iOS now have the choice of upgrading. For iPhone and iPad users, iOS 9.2 brings updates to Apple Music, support for the company’s USB camera adapter, better use of Siri when speaking Arabic, and more. Similar to other updates, 9.2 also brings better protection against malware and other possible software attacks. While not included in this update, having the latest update can also be useful for improved compatibility with new apps and improved battery life.

3K’s iOS 9.2 jailbreak tool remains to be seen. But the amount of demand in the jailbreak community simply at the hint of its existence speaks heavily on how coveted this piece of software is. With hacker groups racing to make their version of the jailbreak tool the one that’s used, we may see one soon even if 3K can’t get it to us.

We’ll bring you more details on the iOS 9.2 untethered jailbreak as they surface.

How The Air Force Planned To Put Men On The Moon

$
0
0

In the spring of 1958, after President Dwight Eisenhower called to create a civilian space agency, the US Air Force assumed it would lead any national spaceflight effort. As such, the service prepared a detailed, multi-stage plan called Man in Space with the goal of landing a man on the Moon by the mid 1960s.

USAF

A MISS spacecraft concept

The first phase of the Man in Space program was a technical demonstration phase called Man in Space Soonest (MISS). This phase would take the first steps in space to understand the human factors involved. The first six flights would be robotic missions designed to test the hardware and flight systems, followed by six animal flights over six months to test the live support system. Once everything was proven, a man would launch, ideally as early as October of 1960. These manned flights would round out the technical needs for the MISS phase by developing reentry and recovery techniques.

As though to compliment the simple goals of the MISS phase, the spacecraft for all stages was very basic. It was expected to be a simple high-drag, zero-lift, blunt-nosed cylinder eight feet in diameter with a flared bottom and an ablative heat shield to protect the passenger from the heat of reentry. The flared skirt would house the reaction control jets for in-orbit attitude control, the retrorockets that would start the spacecraft on its reentry path to Earth, and the recovery parachutes for a splashdown at sea. Throughout the mission, the pilot would lie on his back on a couch, and though it would be pressurized he would still wear a pressure suit as an extra safety measure. Alongside the pilot would be a certain amount of instrumentation, including the main guidance and control systems as well as the secondary power pack, telemetry and voice communications system.

MISS was intended to solve the key unknowns of human spaceflight, keeping the man out of the loop for his own safety; no one wanted to risk a human pilot in case it turned out that weightlessness was debilitatingly disorienting. The pilot would have increased control in later flights, but real pilot control wouldn't come until the second phase of the program, Man in Space Sophisticated (MISSOPH).

USAF

Different pilot positions in the MISS spacecraft

Beginning in March of 1961, the first stage of this phase, MISSOPH I, would send robotic and animal flights in larger spacecraft designed to stay aloft for up to two weeks, the average time it would take to fly to the Moon and back. This spacecraft would be more or less a larger version of the MISS spacecraft but with an airlock to facilitate spacewalks. The second stage, MISSOPH II, would take advantage of the larger Super Titan Fluorine booster to launch to extremely high altitudes. The goal would be to get the spacecraft as far as 40,000 miles from the Earth so that when it returned it would reenter the atmosphere at about 35,000 feet per second, roughly the same speed as a spacecraft returning from the Moon. The third stage, MISSOPH III, would be the first to give the pilot a lot of control owing to its radical new shape. Unlike the blunt vehicles before it, MISSOPH III would feature a flat triangular bottom reminiscent of a boost-glide vehicle so the pilot could make smooth, gliding landings on a runway.

The MISSOPH III spacecraft would live beyond its dedicated stage, facilitating both Earth orbital and lunar missions, but not before the third Lunar Reconnaissance (LUREC) phase of the program flew. LUREC was intended to fly simultaneously with the MISSOPH phase beginning April of 1960. The first stage called LUREC I was devoted to figuring out the details of real-time tracking and communications with a spacecraft a quarter of a million miles from home. Once the tracking system was in place, LUREC II missions could launch on flights to test the guidance system that would get a spacecraft to the right target a quarter of a million miles away. Using an array of scientific instruments, these unmanned vehicles would also measure the temperature, radioactivity, and atmospheric density around the Moon, sending back television images at the same time to help mission planners narrow down safe landing sites.

USAF

The MISSOPH III spacecraft

With a better understanding of the lunar environment, LUREC III would be the first stage to attempt a soft landing on the Moon. The spacecraft would use retro-rockets to slow its descent and telescoping legs to cushion the impact. Staying intact was important; having landed, this spacecraft would gather the first in situ data about the Moon's surface, including seismic and audio data from ground noises.

Building off lessons learned to this point, the final flight phase, Manned Lunar Flight (LUMAN), would be the one to land men on the Moon's surface. The first stage, LUMAN I, called for circumlunar animal flights as early as May of 1962 to verify the hardware, computer, and life support systems. LUMAN II would fly the same mission but with human pilots on board. LUMAN III would resume unmanned flight, soft landing a payload on the Moon. In the LUMAN IV stage, that same spacecraft would land on, then launch from the Moon's surface before returning safely to Earth ideally early in 1963.

At that point, everything would be in place for a manned lunar landing, the goal of the LUMAN V stage. On this mission, one pilot would bring his spacecraft to a soft landing on the lunar surface. Once there, he would leave the spacecraft through the airlock and, thanks to his special pressure suit, be free to explore the surface. He'd get back into his spacecraft for the return flight home and, upon his return, complete the program's main goal sometime around 1965. Subsequent missions would focus on larger scientific and military goals; LUMAN VI and LUMAN VII would see more complex landed and orbital missions resepctively with far more sophisticated science instruments.

When it was pitched in 1958, this Man in Space program was projected to cost $1.5 billion from the first unmanned missions through to the LUMAN missions. But success hinged on a few things, namely getting priority status and the freedom to take control over whatever resources the Air Force might need to get missions flying as soon as possible. And it needed to get that priority status by July 1, 1958, to stay on schedule; the date was just months after the proposal was written.

USAF

Internal layout of MISSOPH III

Though it pushed improved reconnaissance, communications, and early warning systems for protection against enemy attacks as valuable spinoffs, the Air Force's proposal was deemed too lofty. It was scaled back to focus on the Man in Space Soonest phase that could be done quickly and before taking on something as challenging as a lunar mission, which suited the service just fine. Besides, there was little question for the Air Force that it would lead the way in space. It looked at the X-15 program as a model, the joint USAF-NACA (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics) program that had the NACA doing the bulk of the detailed engineering work and the USAF pilots getting the glory of flying record-breaking flights. Why would spaceflight be any different?

Sadly for the Air Force, President Eisenhower’s decision to found a civilian space agency — NASA — preempted any military program. A year later, NASA’s Mercury program was under development with seven astronauts already selected to fly its missions. The Air Force’s involvement in the program was minimal, supplying Atlas rockets and ground support while the new agency’s astronauts became national heroes.

I tell the story of the Air Force’s earliest space programs, including Man in Space, in my book, Breaking the Chains of Gravity, which is in stores in the UK now and will be released in the US on January 12, 2016. You can (pre)order it on Amazon or buy a signed hardcover copy on my website, though my shipping is slower than Amazon’s!Sources: USAF Man in Space proposal. This article was edited from work that appears in my book, Breaking the Chains of Gravity.


Air Force Will Let Enlisted Pilots Fly Global Hawks

$
0
0
Air Force Global Hawk

United States Air Force

Air Force Global Hawk

Sometimes, unmanned is a horrible name for drones. Large military remotely piloted vehicles, like the Global Hawk, are piloted by and attended by rotating shifts of crew. That adds up to a rather large labor force, especially given that Global Hawks can fly for up to 30 hours, and crew shifts are only 8 hours long. So to ease the burden on the pilots, the Air Force is making a big change: They’re letting enlisted pilots fly Global Hawks, and not just commissioned officers.

For years the Air Force has struggled to keep enough drone pilots. The work, often seen within the military as a career dead-end or at least a pause, requires long hours and is not without its psychological toll. Yet demand on drones for intelligence gathering and surveillance, from both the Commander in Chief and commanders in theater, remains high, so the Air Force has struggled to fly as many drone patrols as possible without exhausting its airmen. Earlier this week, the Air Force announced it would offer $125,000 to drone pilots that agreed to stay in service for five more years.

That will help keep existing pilots in. Opening up piloting positions to enlisted members will expand the total available pool of pilots for the Air Force to draw from. In their announcement, the Air Force said:

Air Force officials stated a dynamic threat environment calls for innovative approaches to high-demand missions. After careful consideration and with an eye toward potential future force needs, service officials plan to deliberately integrate the enlisted force into flying operations, starting with the RQ-4 Global Hawk.

“Our enlisted force is the best in the world and I am completely confident they will be able to do the job and do it well,” said Secretary of the Air Force Deborah Lee James. “The [drone] enterprise is doing incredibly important work and this is the right decision to ensure the Air Force is positioned to support the future threat environment. Emerging requirements and combatant commander demands will only increase; therefore, we will position the service to provide warfighters and our nation the capability they deserve today and in the future.”

That’s a lot of Pentagonese. In essence, it means that Global Hawk surveillance is a big part of current missions (like the fight against ISIS), and that Air Force officials expect they’ll need to keep flying as many or more missions in the future.

In World War II, a small number of enlisted members of the United States Army Air Forces served as pilots, however that hasn’t been the case since the Air Force was spun off into its own branch in 1947. Starting in the 1960s, the Air Force only commissioned officers with college degrees to be pilots, usually ones who came up through training programs like the Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps and Officer Training School. This helped the flow of pilots into the Air Force, which would find its manpower sorely taxed in the contested skies above Vietnam.

There was another innovation that in one move almost doubled the available fighter pilots. The Air Force’s main fighter in Vietnam was the F-4 Phantom, which featured a pilot in front and a navigator in the seat behind them. Initially, the Air Force required pilots in both seats (the Navy, which also flew the F-4, never had this requirement). In his history of the fighters of the era, C. R. Aderegg writes:

Interestingly, the decision to take pilots out of the back seat was forced onto the service by Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara, who did not believe the Air Force had a pilot shortage as it claimed. One solution McNamara saw to the shortage was to take the pilot out of the back seat of the F–4, judging that the Air Force was wrong in its claims that it took two pilots to fly the big fighter. Tired of being stonewalled, McNamara directed the change in policy even before the test results were known

Just as in Vietnam, meeting the demands of a long war with existing manpower means changing the way things are done. With its decision to let enlisted airmen pilot unmanned vehicles, it looks like the Air Force is learning this lesson for at least the second time.

Is 3D-Printing A Gun Free Speech?

$
0
0

Cody Wilson/Defence Distributed 2013, via Victoria & Albert Museum

Liberator Gun On Display

Are the files to print a gun protected by the First Amendment, the Second Amendment, or neither? Ever since Cody Wilson of Defense Distributed 3-D printed and fired the Liberator pistol in May of 2013, there have been legal challenges to the gun--and to sharing the files used to print it. One of the strongest comes from the State Department, which is trying to use an act regulating the export of weapons to try and control the gun files. Coming to the defense of Defense Distributed are some First Amendment advocates.

On Friday, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a 25-year-old nonprofit dedicated to protecting civil liberties in new media and communication platforms, filed a brief in support of Defense Distributed, claiming that “the government has gone too far by restricting online speech generally about certain technologies, and requiring would-be publishers to ask for a license to speak--in a process with no binding standards or meaningful government deadlines and no judicial oversight.”

Here’s the key statement from their brief:

The scope of [International Traffic in Arms Regulations]’s prohibition on speech could apply to members of the press republishing newsworthy technical data, professors educating the public on scientific and medical advances of public concern, enthusiasts sharing otherwise lawful information about firearms, domestic activists trading tips about how to treat tear gas or resist unlawful surveillance, and gun control opponents expressing a point about proliferation of weapons.

Innocent online publication on certain topics is prohibited simply because a hostile foreign person could conceivably locate that information, use it to create something harmful, and use a harmful device against US interests. Speech cannot permissibly be repressed for such an attenuated and hypothetical government end.

In America, which has permissive gun laws, the existence of files to 3D-print guns is unlikely to noticeably increase the potential danger from guns. And if America is, through the State Department, trying to protect people in countries like Japan and Australia with strong controls on guns, they’ll find that those nations have already used local laws to penalize the weapons and arrest gunmakers. Enforcing an arms control treaty against electronic files risks squashing speech, and attempts to solve a problem that is already under control.

The Ultimate Star Wars Gift Guide

$
0
0

Now that the spoilers are out and Star Wars Episode VII: The Force Awakens is already breaking records, the question arises: What can I buy to keep the force alive? Last minute-scrambling for high-tech (or just plain fun) Star Wars toys and gadgets is underway. To help with your search, the editors of Popular Science have compiled a list of the 10 best.

Five Questions About Today’s Winter Solstice, Answered

$
0
0
A snowy field with the sun low in the sky

Corina Ardeleanu

Winter Sun

During the winter, the sun stays pretty low in the sky. That’s because of the direction of the Earth’s axis in the sky—it’s leaning back, away from the sun.

1. Is the 2015 winter solstice today or tomorrow? I’ve heard both.

Today, in the U.S. Some calendars list it as December 22, but that’s the date in Universal Time, which is centered around Greenwich, England. This year, the moment of the solstice is 4:49 a.m. on December 22 in Universal Time. But Greenwich is five hours ahead of the East Coast and eight hours ahead of the West. So in New York, this year’s winter solstice is just before midnight—11:49 p.m.—on December 21. In Chicago, it’s 10:49 p.m.; in Denver, 9:49 p.m.; in Seattle, 8:49 p.m.; in Anchorage, 2:49 p.m.; in Honolulu, 1:49 p.m. In England, it's 4:49 tomorrow morning.

2. What is the solstice, anyway?

It’s the precise moment that the north pole of the planet points most directly away from the sun. The Earth’s axis—the line that the planet spins around—always points at a fixed spot in space very near the North Star. As the Earth makes its yearly orbit, the axis sometimes leans toward the sun, sometimes leans away, and the rest of the time is somewhere in between. The summer solstice is when the axis points toward the sun, the winter solstice is when it points away.

diagram showing earth on winter and summer solstices relative to the sun

Katie Peek / Popular Science

The Earth’s bearings in space, relative to the sun’s rays, is what determines the season.

3. So what does that mean here on Earth?

When the axis is leaning away from the sun, a spot on the Earth’s surface will spend more time in the dark than it does in the light. And when it leans toward the sun—like the southern hemisphere currently is—a spot on the globe spends more time in the light than in the dark. On the solstice, that effect is strongest.

In the places where the solstice falls on December 21, the shortest day is today. In places where the solstice falls on the 22nd, that’s the shortest day. Either way, tonight is the longest night the northern hemisphere will experience this year.

diagram showing how the earth's rotation carries a location through sunset on the winter solstice

Katie Peek / Popular Science

When the Earth’s axis leans away from the sun, a spot on the globe will sail through the sunset point before 6 p.m. If the axis leans toward (the southern hemisphere here) the sun will set after 6 p.m.

4. Do those shorter days explain why winter is cold? Because there are fewer hours of sunlight?

In part. But the bigger reason has to do with the angle of the sun’s light. In the winter, the sun is pretty low in the sky all day long, so the sun’s rays are less intense. They hit the ground at a more glancing angle than they do in the summer. That means the same amount of sunlight is spread out over a larger area. Less intense sunlight, less heat. That makes it colder.

diagram showing how sunlight hits the earth's surface in the summer and in the winter

Katie Peek / Popular Science

In the winter, the same amount of light is spread over a larger area. That means we receive less of the sun’s heat, and that makes winter cold.

5. So if it’s the longest night of the year, the sun is going to set later tomorrow night than tonight, right?

Technically, yes. If we don’t look at the data too closely, the longest night of the year is when the sun sets at its earliest possible moment and rises at the latest possible moment. But it’s actually a little (okay, a lot) more nuanced than that. The Earth’s orbit around the sun isn’t a perfect circle, so neither the earliest sunset nor the latest sunrise actually fall on the solstice. We’ll get to why in a minute.

First, in practical terms, the sun set at its earliest time a few weeks ago (the exact date varies depending on your location), and nightfall has been creeping later for a while. Woo! But the sunrise time is the opposite: the sun won’t experience its latest sunrise for a few weeks yet. It’ll be early January before the sunrise time starts shifting earlier again.

If you want to see the full list of sunrise and sunset times for your location, the U.S. Naval Observatory calculator is the tool astronomers use to look up such data. Enter your state and city (or latitude and longitude for non-U.S. locations) and you’ll see the full year’s sunset and sunrise times, and you can see the earliest sunset was in the first half of December.

Once you’ve seen that the effect is real, let’s dive into why. Fundamentally it’s because the Earth’s orbit is an ellipse, not a circle. Picturing exactly how requires some subtle effects of celestial mechanics—namely, the analemma, the figure-eight shape that appears in the sky if you take a picture of the sun at the same time every day throughout the year. Here’s a little animation that shows the sky at the same time each day for one year:

diagram showing the sun's position in the sky over the course of the year, also known as the analemma

Katie Peek / Popular Science

The sun’s motion along the analemma means the earliest sunset of the year actually happens a couple weeks before the solstice.

If the Earth’s orbit were a perfect circle, the sun would simply move back and forth along a single line in the sky. But on its elliptical orbit, it speeds up a little in January, when Earth is closest to the sun, and slows down a little in July, when we’re farthest. And those differences in speed mean the sun makes the figure eight.

The analemma plays into the sunrise and sunset times. On the solstice, the sun is slightly west of where it would be if the Earth’s orbit were circular, so it sets a little earlier. A few weeks after the solstice, the sun has come around to the other side of the analemma’s figure-eight, and it sets a little later than it would if the Earth’s orbit were a circle. And that means that on the solstice, both sunset and sunrise are a few minutes earlier than they would be if we had a circular orbit, and in early January a few minutes later than they would be. When you mix the two effects together—the solstice and the analemma—sunset times are earliest a few weeks before the solstice, and sunrise times are latest a few weeks after.

Aren’t you glad you asked?

Illicit Delivery Drones Keep Crashing Into British Prisons

$
0
0
Strangeways Prison In Manchester

Stemonitis via Wikimedia Commons CC BY 2.5

Strangeways Prison In Manchester

The criminals were fast, airborne, and on a one-way mission. Their crime was as daring as it was well-planned: flying over prison walls, they landed in an area that prison security cameras couldn’t watch, and were set to deliver their cargo. Before they could succeed, they were picked up by guards, and tossed into evidence. The criminals were drones, and last week marked possibly the 9th such time a drone has flown into a British prison.

As International Business Times wrote:

The carefully organised delivery saw the craft operating in one of the very few areas of the prison not covered by CCTV cameras, suggesting its pilot was well-informed about the jail's security setup. It is believed the superstrength skunk and selection of mobile phones and chargers it was carrying were ordered by prisoners in time for the Christmas period.

The holiday timing of the delivery, as well as its relatively innocuous contents, adds a charming twist to a growing threat: cheap drones used to bring contraband into prisons. In the United States, the Justice Department stated it wants to find a way to keep drones out of the prisons it controls, and people have already used drones stateside to get contraband into prisons.

While the United Kingdom deals with a rash of drone smugglers, they might want to turn to Tokyo for advice. Besides restrictive laws on drone flights, Tokyo police now employ an anti-drone squad, which can capture hostile drones with giant nets.

[Fast Company]

African Lions Are Now Considered An Endangered Species

$
0
0

Today, lions joined tigers, a few species of bears, and a host of other endangered species under the protection of the Endangered Species Act.

Subspecies Panthera leo leo, which has a range covering parts of India and western and central Africa, will be listed as endangered. Another subspecies that lives mostly in eastern and southern Africa, Panthera leo melanochaita will be listed as threatened.

“The lion is one of the planet’s most beloved species and an irreplaceable part of our shared global heritage,” Fish and Wildlife Service Director Dan Ashe said in a statement. “If we want to ensure that healthy lion populations continue to roam the African savannas and forests of India, it’s up to all of us – not just the people of Africa and India – to take action.”

The New York Timesreported that one impetus for the addition was the killing of Cecil, a famous and much-beloved lion in July. Cecil was killed for sport by an American dentist on a hunting trip to Africa. Since then, there has been a huge public backlash against trophy hunting. But the petition to include lions under the protection of the Endangered Species Act dates back to 2011, when the Fish and Wildlife Service began considering whether to list Panthera leo leo as endangered. A study by the Fish and Wildlife Service in October found enough evidence to list them as threatened, not endangered, but in the year since, the Service changed their mind.

One of the reasons was a shift in taxonomic thinking. The African lion used to be thought of as a distinct subspecies, separate from the Asiatic lions living in India. Now, genetic testing shows that they are essentially the same. That group, Panthera leo leo has only 1,400 individuals remaining in India and parts of Africa. Panthera leo melanochaita is doing marginally better with about 18,000 individuals.

The protection means that it will soon become much harder to bring lions into the United States, dead or alive. Bringing Panthera leo leo trophies will become next to impossible in the United States, and while trophy hunting of Panthera leo melanochaita may still be allowed, the any hunters wishing to bring trophies back to the United States will have to go through a new, extensive permitting process.

A statement released by the Fish and Wildlife Service said "The process will ensure that imported specimens are legally obtained in range countries as part of a scientifically sound management program that benefits the subspecies in the wild,"

Lions aren't listed as endangered everywhere. The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List lists lions as a vulnerable population, one step above the endangered classification. But it notes that lion populations are declining, with an estimated 43 percent decline between 1993 and 2014.

Even A "Manhattan Project" Won't Make Foolproof, Terrorist-Proof Encryption Possible

$
0
0
Army News App

Todd Lopez, U.S. Army, via Wikimedia Commons

Army News App

By design, encryption keeps secrets secret. Almost all the time, this is great, but it’s vexing for politicians trying to campaign on their anti-terrorism credentials.

In Saturday's Democratic debate, frontrunner and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called for a “Manhattan-like project” to get around encryption technology when moderator Martha Raddatz asked Clinton whether she would force Apple CEO Tim Cook to give law enforcement a key to encrypted communications on Apple devices.

This was Clinton’s response:

I would not want to go to that point. I would hope that, given the extraordinary capacities that the tech community has and the legitimate needs and questions from law enforcement, that there could be a Manhattan-like project, something that would bring the government and the tech communities together to see they're not adversaries, they've got to be partners.

It doesn't do anybody any good if terrorists can move toward encrypted communication that no law enforcement agency can break into before or after. There must be some way. I don't know enough about the technology,Martha, to be able to say what it is, but I have a lot of confidence in our tech experts.

And maybe the back door is the wrong door, and I understand what Apple and others are saying about that. But I also understand, when a law enforcement official charged with the responsibility of preventing attacks -- to go back to our early questions, how do we prevent attacks -- well, if we can't know what someone is planning, we are going to have to rely on the neighbor or, you know, the member of the mosque or the teacher, somebody to see something.

The Manhattan Project was one of the more remarkable works of human science and engineering, and also one of the deadliest. Undertaken during World War II, and created in part at the urging of Albert Einstein, the genius physicists working within the Manhattan Project theorized, designed, and created in the space of just a few years the first-ever working atomic weapons. Used against Japan in August of 1945, the first two atomic weapons killed at least 200,000 people, mostly civilians and likely killed more. Given that less than 3,500 Americans have died of terrorism this century (that includes the death toll from 9/11 attacks), a Manhattan Project is a wholly inappropriate metaphor.

"Maybe the back door is the wrong door."

Here’s how TechDirtexplains the problem:

The real concern is that backdooring encryption means that everyone is more exposed to everyone, including malicious hackers. You create a backdoor and you open up the ability for malicious hackers from everywhere else to get in.

The issue, again, is that what they're really asking for is "Can you make a technology where only 'good' people can use it safely, and everyone else cannot?" And the answer to that question is to point out how absolutely astoundingly stupid the question is. Because there's no way to objectively determine who is "good" and who is "bad," and thus the only possible response is to create code that really thinks everyone is "bad." And to do that, you have to completely undermine basic security practices.

The radical change casually proposed by Clinton leaves the digital world less safe. No amount of high-powered physics can avoid the essential reality. Building a backdoor into an encrypted system -- even if the backdoor is intended to be very closely guarded -- is like adding a thermal exhaust port to a Death Star: it promises that a determined attacker can always get in, and renders the whole thing useless.


Watch The SpaceX Launch At 8:29 Tonight

$
0
0

UPDATE 8:35

We have liftoff! The rocket was successfully launched, and so far, so good. Now, we wait for the landing.

UPDATE 8:21 PM

If you’re watching the webcast, you might notice white ‘smoke’ coming from the rocket. That ‘smoke,’ the SpaceX webcast explains, is some of the liquid oxygen propellent venting out of the rocket. The liquid oxygen is super-cooled, and is loaded into the vehicle just before launch. The chill in the oxygen causes some of the air near the vent to condense and become visible, kind of like your breath condenses on a cold day.

The newly named “Landing Zone 1” where SpaceX will attempt to land the rocket used to be a launch pad in the 1950’s and 1960’s. Now, instead of being a location where rockets will take off, the hope is that it will now become a place where rockets can (safely!) return.

SpaceX is still reporting that they are still go for launch.

Original Post Continues Below

SpaceX delayed launching their Falcon 9 over the weekend, gambling that tonight might have better weather conditions.

The launch will happen in just a few hours time. The Falcon 9 rocket is carrying 11 satellites for ORBCOMM, a communications company that focuses on machine-to-machine connections. The satellites will complete a constellation of satellites already in place that allow companies to monitor transportation, cargo, heavy equipment, and the status of things like oil and gas fields.

But the exciting part is the rocket those satellites will be traveling on. This launch is the first SpaceX launch since a Falcon 9 rocket exploded in June. In the intervening months, SpaceX's team has worked to upgrade the rocket, making it even more powerful.

One of the main goals of SpaceX is to create a reusable rocket. Creating a launch system that isn't disposable would cut costs dramatically (rockets are expensive). To further that goal, SpaceX will attempt to land this rocket on solid ground. Previous attempts used a platform in the middle of the ocean as a potential landing site, but just missed.

Jeff Bezos's company Blue Origin did manage to land a rocket on land last month. But if Elon Musk's SpaceX succeeds tonight, it would be with a larger rocket, capable of launching its cargo into orbit.

Tune in to the SpaceX Webcast tonight around 8:30 pm eastern to watch the launch attempt, or watch the live stream via ORBCOMM's YouTube channel above.

We'll update this post with more details as the launch commences.

Cassini Mission Sends Back Amazing Pictures From Final Enceladus Flyby

$
0
0

The Cassini spacecraft got one last good look at Enceladus on Saturday during its 22nd flyby of Saturn's icy, ocean-laden (and potentially habitable) moon.

Passing at a distance of 3,106 miles, the Saturn-orbiting vehicle snapped these great photos and helped to add more detail of our maps of Enceladus.

Though Cassini will still be able to see Enceladus until its mission ends in 2017, the closest it will come from here on out is about 12,000 miles. Luckily, as some of the photos above show, you can still snap some pretty great photos from that distance.

"This final Enceladus flyby elicits feelings of both sadness and triumph," said Earl Maize, Cassini project manager at JPL, in a press release.

Cassini was the first to spot geysers of water ice spurting from Enceladus' south pole, and helped confirm that the small moon contains a huge ocean beneath its cryogenic crust. Enceladus is now considered one of the solar system's top spots to search for alien life.

These Are The Best Photos Of Ceres We've Ever Seen

$
0
0

NASA's Dawn spacecraft has finally reached its closest orbit to Ceres. Now, from a distance of just 240 miles, we can see the dwarf planet in greater detail than ever.

The Dawn mission was the first to visit a dwarf planet (sorry, Pluto). After arriving in March, the spacecraft has been orbiting and studying Ceres, which is also classified as an asteroid--the largest in the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter.

From a distance of 240 miles, Dawn's view of Ceres is similar to holding a basketball 7 inches from your eyes, chief engineer Marc Rayman told Popular Science in January. The resolution of the new images shows about 140 feet per pixel.

Dawn will spend the remainder of its lifetime in this orbit, so we'll likely be seeing more pictures like this in the near future. The spacecraft is mapping the surface and searching for information about the elements in Ceres' crust--including what makes up those weird bright spots that look like eyes.

The mission is currently funded until June 2016.

Putting Christmas Gifts To Good Use

$
0
0

Photo Credit: NASA via Wikimedia Commons

If you're getting someone on your Christmas list a mobile device with a camera, why not also tell them how they can use it to do Earth science research? This week, I cover three projects you can join if you know how to take decent digital pictures.

S'COOL: If you're a fan of clouds, this project is for you. S'COOL is designed to provide "ground truth" observations of clouds and cloud formations. The data is correlated with overhead satellite imagery from the CERES instrument. CERES stands for Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy Sytem. It is now orbiting the Earth as part of NASA's Earth Science Enterprise to study the ways in which clouds may affect the Earth's climate. Sign up as a school, a classroom, or as an individual citizen scientist.

Picture Post: Here's one for the woodworker/photographer on your list. Picture Post is a part of the Digital Earth Watch (DEW) network. DEW conducts environmental monitoring through digital photography and satellite imagery. In this project you use an 8-sided platform for taking overlapping photographs of the entire landscape around you and an “up” picture of the sky. To participate, you'll need to build a special, but simple octagon-shaped post, and to upload photos.

SatCam: SatCam is another project where you capture observations of sky and ground conditions when an Earth observation satellite is overhead. The apps works with the Terra, Aqua, and Suomi NPP satellites; whenever you make an observation, you get an image from the satellite above!

Chandra Clarke is a Webby Honoree-winning blogger, a successful entrepreneur, and an author. Her book Be the Change: Saving the World with Citizen Science is available at Amazon. You can connect with her on Twitter @chandraclarke.

Mars InSight Mission May Be In Jeopardy Due To Leaky Instrument

$
0
0

NASA/JPL

InSight

The InSight (Interior exploration using Seismic Investigations, Geodesy and Heat Transport) lander was designed to take Mars' vital signs: Its "pulse" (seismology), "temperature" (heat flow probe), and "reflexes" (precision tracking).

The Mars InSight lander, built to study Mars' interior and geological history, was scheduled to lift off from Earth in March 2016. Now, faced with a faulty seismometer, NASA says the mission will be delayed at least 26 months--and there's a chance it won't launch at all.

In order to study Mars' tremors, the lander's seismometers need to be sealed in an airtight chamber--otherwise wind creates confusing noise in the data. Bruce Banerdt, lead scientist on the mission, said in a teleconference that the device is sensitive enough to detect the vibration of a single atom, which is why it needs to operate in a vacuum. However, engineers have been unable to make the French-made Seismic Experiment for Interior Structure (SEIS) airtight enough to survive a rough landing and operate in Mars' freezing temperatures.

After the March 2016 launch window closes, the mission will have to wait at least 26 months until Earth and Mars are in the proper alignment again. That is, if NASA doesn't call off the mission entirely. The mission is capped at a cost of $675 million for everything--building the spacecraft, launching it, and operating it on Mars--and the team has already spent $525 million of that money. Now the team leaders need to sit down and figure out how much it's going to cost to fix or redesign the instrument, and whether that fits within the budget. If it doesn't work out financially, it looks like the mission will be scrapped.

SEIS has been giving the team problems for months now, and tests on Monday revealed the leaks still weren't fixed after several attempts.

"As of yesterday, we were still planning to go," said John Grunsfeld from NASA's Science Mission Directorate. "We just ran out of time."

12/22/2015 at 4:25PM Eastern: This article was updated to include new information from a NASA teleconference.

Viewing all 20161 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images