Quantcast
Channel: Popular Science | RSS
Viewing all 20161 articles
Browse latest View live

A Crazy Size Comparison Of Sci-Fi's Greatest Ships [Infographic]

$
0
0

Being a small child, I often think to myself: What if the Star Wars spaceships got into a fight with the ships from Star TroopersThanks to this infographic from DeviantART user Dirk Loechel, I finally have an inkling of how they'd stack up in an intergalactic dogfight.

The infographic makes a size comparison of ships from a bunch of resources: we've got Star WarsTrek, and Troopers represented, plus movies like Aliens, and games like Halo and Eve. Each pixel is equivalent to 10 meters, so, yeah, these things are big. But what's the biggest, baddest of them all? The mothership from Independence Day apparently, which measures 24,000 meters--way too huge to fully fit on the chart.

You can see the full version here. Maybe now someone would be kind enough to combine it with this chart of monster sizes. 

Sci-Fi Ships
Dirk Loechel

Sci-Fi Ships
Dirk Loechel

Sci-Fi Ships
Dirk Loechel

Sci-Fi Ships
Dirk Loechel

[DeviantART via Kotaku]


Big Pic: 3-D Printed Space Gloves Rule The World

$
0
0

Spacewalk Replica
ESA-Anneke Le Floc'h

When you're a famous astronaut, anything you touch basically turns to space gold. And then people make replicas of the things that you've touched, because those, too, are pretty close to space gold. Right? I think that's how it works. These mismatched gloves are 3-D printed replicas of a glove worn by European Space Agency astronaut Hans Schlegel during a 2008 spacewalk, made at the ESA's technology center in the Netherlands. The little baby glove on the left (hanging out near France) is a tenth of the original glove's size. The one on the right is to scale.

Space agencies like NASA and the ESA have been giving 3-D printing a lot of love lately. NASA has been testing out 3-D printed rocket parts, and has plans to send a 3-D printer to the ISS as early as next year. Right now, the ESA uses 3-D printing to create models of proposed spacecraft designs, and is exploring designs for 3-D printing a lunar base. And occasionally they make thermoplastic recreations of space suit parts.

Schlegel, a physicist, flew on two different space shuttle missions, including the 2008 mission that brought the Columbus Laboratory to the International Space Station. Schlegel's ESA bio reveals these insights into his life:

Born on 3 August 1951 in Überlingen, Germany, Hans Schlegel considers Aachen to be his hometown. Hans is married to astronaut candidate Heike Walpot. He has seven children. Recreational interests include skiing, scuba diving and flying. He also enjoys reading and do-it-yourself work.

Astronaut love!

[ESA]

Scientists Make Photons Act Like Real-Life Light Saber

$
0
0

President Obama Wields A Light Saber
Photons are particles without mass; until now, our understanding has been that they do not interact with each other at all. That's why, when you shine two lights at each other, they don't bounce off and throw light all over the place; the photos simply pass right through. But new research from Harvard and MIT has succeeded in getting photons to play nice with each other--which means we can construct "molecules" made entirely of light. Perhaps even--dare we say it--sabers. Of light. "Photon-molecule saber," catchy name.

A quote from the press release, on how this was done:

Researchers began by pumping rubidium atoms into a vacuum chamber, then used lasers to cool the cloud of atoms to just a few degrees above absolute zero. Using extremely weak laser pulses, they then fired single photons into the cloud of atoms. As the photons enter the cloud of cold atoms, Lukin said, its energy excites atoms along its path, causing the photon to slow dramatically. As the photon moves through the cloud, that energy is handed off from atom to atom, and eventually exits the cloud with the photon.

"When the photon exits the medium, its identity is preserved," Lukin said. "It's the same effect we see with refraction of light in a water glass. The light enters the water, it hands off part of its energy to the medium, and inside it exists as light and matter coupled together, but when it exits, it's still light. The process that takes place is the same it's just a bit more extreme – the light is slowed considerably, and a lot more energy is given away than during refraction."

The result of that process? As the photons exited the cloud, they were clumped together. That's a result of the nearby atoms; when one atom is excited, nearby atoms cannot be excited to the same degree, in an effect called a Rydberg blockade. So when a photon comes in, it excites nearby atoms, but when the next photon enters the cloud, it would excite nearby atoms to the same degree--which it can't do. So the first photon has to move out of the way. That's an interaction between photons, sort of, but with atoms as a mediator. What it means is that the two photons end up pushing and pulling each other through the cloud of atoms, and when they exit the cloud, they're clumped like a molecule, thanks to that continued interaction.

The scientists think this breakthrough could lead to improvements in quantum computing; photons are an excellent carrier for quantum information, but the lack of interaction between photons has limited the amount of information that can be carried. The paper appears in the journal Nature.

Readers Respond To Our Decision To Drop Comments

$
0
0
 
I am very pro-internet for its capacity to connect minds and reiterate the often arbitrary nature of fame and popularity. It is because of this, not in spite of this, that I applaud your decision to remove the comments section from your articles. While it may strike many people as regressive, I view it as very forward-looking, as a decisive approach to better focus feedback and debate. --Zachary Simon, via email

I could not agree more with Popular Science's recent decision to close its comment section. I have long feared that thousands, perhaps millions, of people are wholly misinformed on a number of issues that are really quite simple, because of their experiences in comment sections. Of course the phenomenon has existed in other forms for as long as science has, but never has science been such a willing participant as it is now by virtue of publishing reader comments. Popular Science's decision to ask people to take their "debates," if you could even call them that, elsewhere is brave and inspiring.--Elizabeth Flory, via email 

It saddens me that Popular Science felt the need to shut off the comment section. Trust me I understand the destruction that trolls can do, as I'm a science educator myself and hear some wild stuff from the public that "read it somewhere." However, the platforms you leave open to discuss (facebook, twitter and so on) is not a solution.  How does this decision gel with Popular Science's tag line is "The Future Now"?  You say you are "the first stop for what is new and next."  How does this decisions go with "new and next?" I'm glad that comments will be allowed on some select articles, as I agree that a comment thread isn't necessary for every publication, but the solution, the future, is in another platform.  I do not know what that is, but this is what you should be seeking.  Software developers working with journalist and educators to find a platform to allow for discussions.  Actually I've been to forums where just a good moderator makes it worthwhile and strengthens the topic.  Is a fulltime internet conent moderator an answer?  Sure, but maybe not the best answer.--Sean P. Rooney, via email 

Bravo. I wish other science based sites would follow your example. This isn't a social media site to let everyone say whatever they wish. This is a site to publish reputable science news. That means stuff that has been vetted, gone through peer review, etc. Just because someone happens to believe that Creationism is true doesn't mean that they should be able to have equal say on a magazine that requires factual, evidence based studies and reports before they will publish an article.--Tug Brice, via email 

I am an avid commenter on a variety of news sites--sometimes I'm snarky, sometimes very thoughtful and thought-provoking. That is the nature of human conversation which is what the comment sections offer, is it not? More importantly, what you are doing is reverting to the time when the media was a one way conversation--you publish, if we're interested, we read. At best, we can write a letter to the editor, which if published, happens weeks or months or even days after the article is printed or put online. By then, everybody forgets what the article was about. So I would challenge you to rethink this decision. I'm sure your magazine is interesting and valuable to those drawn to your subject matter. Do not close them out by having just a one way relationship.--Gary Doyens, via email 

Please don't turn off comments. The comments are so valuable. You have SMART readers who know how to filter out the trolls. On many occasions, Popsci commenters have helped me understand articles that were over my head. I need them.--Steve Thorson, via email 
 
Passing a test for comprehension of an article should be required before allowing someone to comment on it.  This may not eliminate all the trolls or rudeness, but, at least, the comments will be made by people who understand what the article was about.--John Creutz, via email 
 
A politically motivated minority should not get equal media time to refute findings by the majority of the world's scientists, creating confusion and misconceptions for the general public.  I commend you for turning the comment sections off!--Sandip Suvedi, via email

Peer review is good for science when the peers are educated professionals. When the people reviewing are just anti-science conservative high school dropouts who think they can detest climate models when they can't even find the root of a linear equation, the reviews are just obnoxious.--Joe Hays, via Facebook

This is disappointing. Seems like the only ones winning are... the ignorant and those who are politically motivated to shut down intelligent conversation. Restricting the flow of ideas is surely the best way to spread ignorance.--Ben Peterson, via Facebook

I think you've made the right decision, thanks for the explanation. Now if only I could state my opinion on your post publicly on the website.--Nick Anglewicz, via email

Curiosity Finds Water And Poison In Martian Soil

$
0
0

'Rocknest' in the Gale Crater, Mars
Photo taken by the Curiosity rover on its 52nd Martian day, or sol, corresponding with September 28, 2012, on Earth.
NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS

You watched it land, trundle around a bit, and attack innocent rocks. Now you can learn a lot more about the science NASA's Curiosity rover has been beaming back to Earth. Today, teams of scientists from all around the world are publishing six papers about their analyses of some of the first samples scooped up by Curiosity's scientific instruments. 

The studies tried to determine how friendly Mars would be to any future human visitors. They also looked for clues to Mars' geological history. It turns out the Martian soil has a bit of water that people might extract with heating, as well as small amounts of a toxic chemical that explorers will have to watch out for. 

Here we've highlighted our favorite findings, along with links to all of the papers, in case there's anything you're into that we've missed. Bon voyage, Curiosity.

In the hot seat

One of the first things Curiosity did on the red planet was scoop up some stuff from a patch of sand and dust called Rocknest. (Scientists thought it looked like a little nest for rocks, deputy director of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, Laurie Leshin, told the Science podcast.) The rover then examined its Martian soil sample using its ChemCam, CheMin and Sample Analysis at Mars (SAM) instruments.

In one of its analyses, Curiosity heated a sample of soil, about half the size of a baby aspirin, to about 835 degrees Celsius (about 1,535 degrees Fahrenheit). At that temperature, the minerals in the soil break down and release volatile gases. A team of international scientists found water vapor, sulfur dioxide, carbon dioxide and oxygen in the sample, in that order of abundance. 

Curiosity at the Sand Shadow Site in Mars' Gale Crater
NASA

So a good amount of the sample—about 1.5 percent to 3 percent by weight—was water. "To me, that's interesting because of the good resource for potential human explorers," Leshin says. "Two percent water means that if you had, say, a square foot of this—or, a cubic foot, sorry—of this soil and heated it up, you could get about two pints of water out of it." Earth's dirt has about 10 times as much water as Mars'.

One recurring theme from this and other soil analyses: Curiosity and its predecessors, including Pathfinder, Spirit and Opportunity, all pretty much found the same soil composition in different Martian locations. This suggests that water-containing soil is available everywhere on Mars. It could also mean some process on Mars is mixing its dirt evenly across its surface, or that the composition of the planet's crust is similar everywhere.

(See the original paper)

Killer dirt

The other gases from the heating analysis told scientists about what minerals appeared in Martian soil. There was some bad news for any future Mars visitors. The oxygen was released with chlorine gas, which indicates a small fraction of the soil contains perchlorate, which is toxic if ingested. "It's good to know now that it's there," Leshin says, "so we can plan for when humans go to Mars and there's dust everywhere. How are we going to deal with that issue?"

(See the original paper)

No organics

Curiosity did not find any so-called organic compounds, a name that doesn't necessarily mean the compounds come from living sources. Instead, organic compounds contain elements, including carbon, that scientists consider to be the building blocks of life. Such compounds may be important to future Mars explorers.

The surface of Mars is exposed to a lot of radiation and other harsh conditions, Leshin says, so scientists are still holding out hope that the planet has organic compounds tucked away deeper underground. Curiosity is equipped with a drill to find out.

An unusual rock

The Rock Called Jake_M
NASA/JPL-Caltech

On its 43rd Mars-day, or sol, after landing, Curiosity ran into a pyramid-shaped rock that is unlike any other Martian rock humans have ever found. Scientists named the rock Jake Matijevic, after Curiosity's former lead surface operations systems engineer, who died in 2012.

An analysis found Jake_M's proportions of minerals is different from other Martian rocks. However, the rock does look a lot mugearites on Earth, which are a rare type of rock that appear on ocean islands and in continental rifts (Glamorous). Jake_M is so similar to Earthly mugearites, the research team wrote in their paper that if they'd found Jake_M on Earth, they wouldn't know it came from Mars. Mugearites—and Jake_M—are igneous rocks, which means they formed from magma. (Other missions have found other igneous rocks on Mars, but not mugearite-like ones.)

The team used Jake_M's chemistry to hypothesize how it could have formed. It would have required either a high amount of water in the magma, or high pressure, or both. That's evidence that there may be some water under Mars' crust.

(See the original paper)

More dirt on Mars

Eager for more? Here's a paper about the two different types of soils that Curiosity's x-ray and laser instruments found in Rocknest. One was a fine-grained type that other rovers have found in other locations, too. The second was a coarser-grained type that seems more local to Rocknest. 

This paper characterizes the soils in Rocknest, examining dirt both with and without a crystalline structure. The non-crystalline stuff is similar to the soil in… Hawaii.

This paper examines a patch of sand near Rocknest, on the lee side of some obstruction to the Martian wind.

Where is Curiosity now?

The little rover that could is still in the Gale Crater, moving as fast as it can toward Mount Sharp. Mount Sharp has geologic layers that may tell scientists more about Mars' history. The mountain may also contain organic compounds. 

There are five planned rest stops along the way, during which Curiosity will take samples and perform more science. The rover recently passed Waypoint 1.

Curiosity's Waypoint 1
A mosaic of four images taken by the Curiosity rover on its way to Mount Sharp, on its 400th Mars-day (sol), September 21, 2013, on Earth.
NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS

Trained Police Rats Sniff Out Crime In The Netherlands

$
0
0

Smell A Rat?
Oskila via Wikimedia Commons

In Rotterdam, the second-largest city in the Netherlands, rats are more than just scurrying subway pests. They're trained crime fighters.

The Dutch police have begun training rats to identify certain smells, just like drug-sniffing dogs. They're quick learners, according to Monique Hamerslag, who heads the project. "They need barely 10 to 15 days to learn to distinguish a certain smell," she told AFP. Plus, rats cost far less than trained dogs, both to buy and to house. (No need to take your rat for long walks in the park.)

The first rat cadet class--Derrick, Thomson, Thompson, Magnum, and Poirot, all named after fictional detectives--have been training for the past two years. Derrick has the accuracy of a finely-tuned machine--a 98.8 percent success rate, according to Spiegel Online.

As awesome as the rats' detection abilities are, though, they probably won't ever be able to supplant the canine sniffer entirely. Rats are cautious animals, and don't like to go barging into unfamiliar situations to sniff out a body or find drugs. Instead, the police bring the smells to their cages, presenting them with samples of things like potentially gunpowder-ridden clothing, to figure out what to test first. Derrick and his buds haven't been let loose on any real police work yet, but they'll hopefully be trained, tested and on the job by sometime next year.

[AFP via Phys.org]

This Magic Projection Box Will Melt Your Brain

$
0
0

 

 

San Francisco design studio Bot & Dolly created this demonstration of what is almost certainly sorcery a projection mapping system. The project's simply called "Box," and without ruining too much, the studio projects images on to moving objects, creating surreal, sleight-of-hand illusions. This is a mini-demomstration of that system, done in a single shot. It's the most retina-frying, mind-expanding thing you'll see today. 

[Laughing Squid]

An Open-Source Hive To Save The Bees

$
0
0

 

 

You may have heard by now: bees are dropping like flies, continuing to die at unprecedented rates, and the reason why is still a bit of a mystery.  

So to give them a leg up, the group Open Tech Forever has developed a beehive that can track the health of bees, and is giving the code away to anyone who wants it. From the project site:

The Open Source Beehives project is a collaborative response to the threat faced by bee populations in industrialised nations around the world. The project proposes to design hives that can support bee colonies in a sustainable way, to monitor and track the health and behaviour of a colony as it develops. Each hive contains an open source sensory kit, The Smart Citizen Kit (SCK), which can transmit to an open data platform: Smartcitizen.me

These sensor enhanced hive designs are open and freely available online, the data collected from each hive is published together with geolocations allowing for a further comparison and analysis of the hives.

If you're a professional beekeeper or hobbyist, and handy with electronics, you get a double-whammy: a free design for a high-tech beehive that can monitor your bees' environment, and a chance to contribute to citizen science. 

This isn't the first attempt to enlist new technology to solve the bee crisis, but it might be the first to bring the idea to the masses. Which is good, since the Bee Crisis is something that needs a solution soon. 

Below is a closer look at the hives, and you can find the source code for the hives at the project site.

 

[Boing Boing]


    







The 13 Weirdest-Named Academic Journals

$
0
0

Rangifer
The journal of the Nordic Council for Reindeer Husbandry Research.

Scientists are constantly out proving how the world works, often answering questions most people wouldn't think deserve probing, much less funding: how fast couples walk together, the fluid dynamics of elephant pee, what makes turkeys sexy and how lesbian couples hold hands. And what of the academy that publishes these works? These journals undoubtedly churn out important work cataloging the day-to-day grind of the scientific machine. But...some of them have ridiculous names. Some, like the Nordic Council for Reindeer Husbandry Research's publication Rangifer, are so incredibly specific you'd think they'd run out of submissions after the first issue. Others, like the journal Small, seem so broad you wonder what they might even publish.

In our daily explorations of new studies and academic papers, we've come across a few scholarly publications, from the very scientific to the not-so, that crack us up. Here are some of our favorites.


    






How To Win A Trampoline War, According To Science

$
0
0

 

 

Before Alison Sheets was an assistant professor at Ohio State University, she was a competitive gymnast who knew her way around a trampoline. Over dinner one day, she began explaining the dynamics of trampoline bouncing games to her colleague Manoj Srinivasan, an assistant professor in the mechanical and aerospace engineering department. Srinivasan had never (and still hasn't) been on a trampoline, so he had never heard of a "seat drop war," in which two players alternately bounce on their feet and their butt, vying to be the last player bouncing as they lose energy and it becomes harder and harder to bounce high enough to stand up from the sitting phase.

Now, Srinivasan knows a whole lot more about trampoline game theory than most people who have actually been on a trampoline. He, Sheets and their colleague Yang Wang decided to write a paper on the mechanics of the seat drop war, exploring the physics of stealing an opponent's energy and the complex dynamics of the zero-sum game.

Seat Drop Diagram
Srinivasan et al.
When two people bounce such that for a period of time, they're both in contact with the trampoline, a dramatic transfer of energy occurs, allowing the second person to steal some (or most) of the first's energy.

This is what it looks like in a more simplified view. To figure out the pure mechanics of trampoline bouncing, Srinivasan bounced balls on a mini-trampoline. Later, they took into account a little bit of game theory, since the whole process becomes more complicated once human strategy comes into play.

 

 

According to the paper, a player should aim to hit the trampoline halfway through an opponent's bounce. The researchers write (emphasis in the original) "if mass-2 makes contact when mass-1 is approximately half-way through its bounce, the energy transfer is essentially 100% in a single bounce." The transfer of energy between players is greater when you're closer together, so to most effectively steal all of someone's energy, sit close. And it wouldn't hurt to start with a little more energy—so if you're not the heavier player, jump high!

Go forth, and win ridiculous trampoline competitions. Although the researchers do note that "while the energy transfers may make multiple people bouncing on a trampoline more fun, they also make such bouncing more dangerous and unpredictable."

Physics nerds, make sure to read the whole paper in PLOS ONE.


    






A Self-Assembling Molecular Train Set

$
0
0

photo of a model train scene
Choo Choo
U.S. National System of Public Lands

When the tiny bits of stuff inside your body's cells need to get somewhere, they move on tracks, like the cars of a train. Protein, genetic material and organelles—the mini-organs inside each cell—all move around inside the cell along tracks made of long, stringy proteins. 

Now, a team of scientists is reporting they've made a bunch of proteins that build their own artificial tracks, shuttle stuff around for a few micrometers, and then break down the tracks after they're done (So tidy). I'm not sure how much of a need there is for this, but the system's creators, a team of physicists from the University of Oxford, wrote in their paper that such self-assembling systems could move molecules around in chemical reactions. 

The artificial proteins have short stretches of DNA attached to them to tell them what to do.  They form tracks in a sort of star shape, with several tracks radiating outward from a central point. (The researchers wrote they were inspired by color-changing fish, which form such star-shaped tracks inside their cells to shuttle pigments around.) When given ATP, the natural fuel cells use, the artificial shuttles scoot along their tracks to the center of the star.

You can see the system at work in this video the researchers made. The tracks are red and that's what you see at first. Then the researchers add in protein shuttles carrying fluorescent-green "cargo." The shuttles adhere all over the tracks, at random, before all moving to the center. Lastly, the researchers add in a DNA signal that tells the shuttles to disperse, leaving the tracks red and empty again:

The research appeared in the journal Nature Nanotechnology.

[University of Oxford]


    






TOUR GLENFIDDICH... FROM ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD [SPONSORED ARTICLE]

$
0
0

Glenfiddich®

At Popular Science we are all about innovation. While it’s possible to find out about the newest gadgets and latest models from a host of wonderful sites that are everywhere online, we make it our mission to hunt down and report specifically on those companies and individuals who are breaking the boundaries, who are changing the game, who are shifting paradigms. The pioneers. We want to bring you stories about things that will fundamentally change our lives and experiences. 

Our reporters recently came across a little-known technology start-up called Condition One that is developing a three dimensional, interactive video technology that we immediately recognized as the first of its kind. Condition One is the brainchild of Danfung Dennis, a respected war correspondent photojournalist and ACADEMY AWARD® Nominee. Danfung’s goal was to try and bring the audience more directly into his dispatches so that they could feel more connected to events that were unfolding. Guided by his experience of being “in the moment,” Condition One employs sophisticated original code to map footage shot in extreme wide angle onto an active virtual panorama around the user, cleverly utilizing the iPad’s accelerometers to allow you to look all around the filmed events in real time. Imagine being able to step into the psyche of another person’s mind, actually seeing the world from their viewpoint. This is a step closer to full immersion. Guess what? You don’t have to imagine that any more. 

Although the inspiration for Condition One was bringing people closer to the news, it is equally good at bringing us closer to any location that interests us. We’ve already partnered with scientists at Cern’s LHC to give our audience a virtual panoramic tour of one of the most important ongoing physics experiments in the world. Now we’re partnering with Glenfiddich to transport you to Scotland, where arguably the most important whisky making in the world takes place. 

To ensure that our virtual film would be of the highest quality, we actually sent a specialized film crew all the way to the tiny village of Dufftown in Speyside, Scotland, Glenfiddich’s only distillery. Working closely with their expert craftsmen and women, we’ve designed the tour so that you will not only learn about the fine art and science of Glenfiddich whisky making, you’ll also feel like an honored guest. Trust us, it’s just like being there. But don’t just take our word for it, download the app now.

Glenfiddich®

To learn more about the fascinating world of single malts, visit
GLENFIDDICH.COM
SKILLYFULLY CRAFTED. ENJOY RESPONSIBLY. 
Glenfiddich® Single Malt Scotch Whisky. 40% alc/vol ©2013 Imported by William Grant & Sons, New York, NY


    

How Evolution Determines The Flavor Of Beer and Whiskey

$
0
0

Fermenting

Back in August of 2011, unconventional chef David Chang stood up in front of a gathering of chefs and other food people in Copenhagen to give a talk about food and microbiology. He opened his presentation by apologizing to the audience: “we know so little about [microbiology], that I'm going to be the one talking to you about it.”

Chang went on to describe his experiments creating unique fermented flavors for high-end dishes. And Chang is not the only chef to have pushed the boundaries of microbial science in pursuit of gastronomy. Rene Redzepi’s Nordic Food Lab creates their own fish sauce using local fish. Husband and wife team Alex Talbot and Aki Kamozawa tinker with a wide variety of bespoke vinegars.

And then there’s beer. It’s not uncommon for a major brewery like Harpoon or Dogfish Head to maintain a crew of microbiologists on staff whose sole job is to wrangle and test the activity of yeast. Why pay for these expensive scientists? Because the flavor of every batch of beer depends on their work.

Alcohol has its own genesis story. Some thousands of years ago, humans probably accidentally left vessels of juice outside for a long time. When they returned, the juice had gone sour, bubbly, and alcoholic. The yeasts naturally present in the air had begun to digest the sugar in the juice, and the result was the first naturally fermented alcohol.

In the thousands of years since the first accidental alcohol production, brewers have taken samples of yeast from the best beers and used, reused, and blended them with other yeasts to produce unique yeast strains optimized for different flavors.

A master brewer is to yeast what a dog breeder is to a champion purebred.

You might say that a master brewer is to yeast what a dog breeder is to a champion purebred. Both disciplines harness the power of artificial selection, also known as selective breeding. As Harvard microbiologist and avid homebrewer Sarah Douglass explains, “when you add yeast to sugar, you’re putting them into into their ideal environment for rapid evolution via rapid growth. You might see several generations of yeast live, reproduce, and die in a single fermentation.”

To keep things consistent, commercial brewers “spike” each fermentation with an initial batch of yeast. Large batches of these flagship yeast are kept deep frozen in suspended animation. Yet eventually even these stocks run out, at which point scientists do their best to recreate the lost flavor profile using other strains of yeast.

What about creating yeast strains in the lab? “We do have the technology to make all sorts of molecular changes in yeast,” Douglass told me. “But flavor is such a complex trait, with so many metabolic pathways involved, that we're much better off using artificial selection to find yeast strains that make tasty beer. Trying to engineer a tasty yeast strain from scratch, by deleting genes or turning up protein expression, would be very difficult.”

Beer gets the most of the buzz (pun intended) about innovation in yeast. That’s because yeast define a beer’s flavor, and so yeasts are constantly tested and tweaked at a brewery. Cultivating yeast for spirits is more tricky, because both the distillation process itself and the bold oak and smoke flavors of aged spirits can quickly mask the subtle notes contributed by yeast. Some spirits, however, continue to spotlight the importance of microbes.

Liquid Yeast
“I know that rhum agricole and artisanal cachaça primarily utilise wild yeast, and I know Del Maguey mezcal prides itself by presenting a diverse range of products that really show how airborne yeast change in different geographies,” bartender Andrew Cameron, of Papa Jack’s in Brisbane, Australia, told me. “It's like with every sip of the spirit, you're tasting a snapshot of what the airborne flora must be like. It's much alike to soil terroir in wine.” Or as Momofuku’s Chang would say, it like tasting a spirit’s "microbial terroir.”

Whereas so-called microbial terroir refers to naturally occurring yeast (a process called “wild ferment”), brewers and distillers usually go to yeast houses to purchase yeasts specially cultivated for specific purposes. And some houses are known for particular offerings. Lallemand specializes in wine yeasts. Red Star sells “Red Star Whiskey” yeast, a key contributor to the distinctive flavor of American whiskies. There are even yeasts bred to survive high concentrations of ethanol, designed for the production of rubbing alcohol.

When John Jeffery, Head Distiller at Death’s Door Distillery in Middleton, Wisconsin set out to make his now widely-praised unaged “white dog” whiskey, he went to the traditional yeast houses, but bought something a little different.

“Traditional whiskey yeasts are designed to produce aromatic compounds that age well in the barrel,” Jeffery told me. “But, a lot of these compounds are harsh and unappetizing if they’re not aged. For our white dog, I used champagne yeast, which is yeast designed to create floral and vegetal aromas from grape sugars, but I found it does really well with corn sugar.”

Most distillers would probably have just used a traditional whiskey yeast to create an unaged whiskey, but for practical reasons, not out of laziness. When brewing beer, it’s a relatively straightforward process to experiment with yeast: simply brew, ferment, and taste. With spirits, the additional distillation step (and all the complexities that come with it) makes the results less predictable, and experimentation more risky.

Jeffery got around this limitation by using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) machines and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) machines, normally found only in university laboratories, to precisely analyze the aroma compounds created at multiple points along the distillation process. In the distillery, he also benefited from high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) machines that Death’s Door keeps on hand for spur-of-the-moment sampling.

The key to the success of Jeffery’s white whiskey was the fact that instead of using a yeast that had been cultivated for spirits production, he used a yeast designed to eat fruit sugars and die early. "It was in the death throes of the yeast that it released these really interesting aromas.”

However much we may think we know about yeast after thousands of years of cultivation, they remain only one piece of the microbial flavor puzzle. Other single-celled organisms such as mold, bacteria, and fungi also live in the air we breathe. For example, it’s acetic acid bacteria that distinguich normal vinegar from artisan-crafted balsamic. And it’s the mold penicillium that gives blue cheese its distinctive funk.

In spirits, other microbes have the opportunity to interact with yeasts. Lambic-style beers in particular derive their complex aromas and charateristic acidity through a multi-stage fermentation, part of which involves lactic acid bacteria. In the spirits realm, many bourbon makers intentionally expose used mash (the precursor to distillation) to the open air to create “sour mash,” a technique for making the flavor of the bourbon more consistent.

So is it safe to experiment with microbes at home? I would recommend against setting up a home microbiology lab. Some microbes can produce toxins, and while it’s unlikely that a finished homebrew would end up truly harmful, there’s no reason to tempt fate when so many safe yeasts are available commercially.

In controlled environments, however, work on microbes and flavor will continue. “Following the craft-brewing boom that began in the 1980s,” Jeffery told me, “a new generation of brewers who understand yeast and microbiology are moving over to the distilling space.” So expect to taste new frontiers in microbiology in your favorite alcoholic drink sometime soon.


    






Interactive Infographic: What Would A Hyperloop Nation Look Like?

$
0
0

Explore a hypothetical North American Hyperloop network, where total travel time between cities by Hyperloop is represented by color. Click on a city to re-center the map at a different origin. Mouse over a destination city to compare calculated Hyperloop travel time with drive time and to see the additional travel time needed to reach nearby cities. Infographic by Michael Kelly.

In August, Silicon Valley darling Elon Musk—CEO of SpaceX and Tesla Motors—unveiled his concept for the Hyperloop, a high-speed system of 28-person pods that would shoot through low-pressure tubes on air bearings. Musk’s published proposal calls for the Hyperloop to link San Francisco and Los Angeles; pods would blast down the I-5 corridor at 760 mph, reducing the journey from five and a half hours by car to just 35 minutes. 

Musk envisions the system connecting cities less than 900 miles apart—beyond that, he writes, “I suspect supersonic air travel ends up being faster and cheaper.” Using the 900-mile limit, we calculated other areas that could be connected by the Hyperloop. Theoretically, pairs such as Memphis and Chicago or Salt Lake City and Seattle could bridge the distance of a morning commute, blending economies and cultures, and reshaping the continent.

COST
Elon Musk estimates that a Hyperloop from San Francisco to Los Angeles will cost six billion dollars, one tenth the proposed cost of California’s high-speed rail project. Transportation experts, however, say he is underestimating the price tag. 

CULTURE
A Hyperloop could bridge borders, making San Antonio and Mexico City suburbs of each other, with a journey of 75 minutes. Farther north, New York and Montreal would be only 35 minutes apart.

COMFORT
Even along the relatively straight California I-5, sideways accelerations in Musk’s proposal are three times higher than typical train limits. As the Hyperloop follows curvier highways in other areas, it may need some tweaks to avoid becoming a vomit comet.

SCALE 
Each year, people take six million rides from New York to Washington, D.C., on Amtrak and two million rides by plane. Musk estimates a passenger pod departing up to every 30 seconds, which means each Hyperloop could provide 7.4 million commutes a year.

HyperLoop Diagram
Tesla Motors

How It Works

Pods speed through low-pressure—but not vacuum—tubes perched on pylons. Typically, as a pod moves through a snugly sized tube, it must push the column of air in front of it. That air would build up until it becomes unmanageably heavy—a constraint known as the Kantrowitz limit. But the Hyperloop design includes a fan at the front of the pod that pulls that air in and redirects it to the bearings, thus overcoming the Kantrowitz limit and simultaneously providing a low-friction suspension system. “He’s probably found something of a systemic sweet spot, which makes it kind of creative and interesting. It’s a physical option that really wasn’t on the table before,” says Jim Moore, a transportation engineer at the University of Southern California. But Moore also thinks Musk has underestimated the cost. “It’s not a compelling enough option to penetrate the market.”

This article originally appeared in the November 2013 issue of Popular Science.


    






Bird Flu Strain Jumps From Animals To People For The First Time

$
0
0

Researching H7N9
CDC

A common strain of bird flu that had previously only infected poultry has reached what's reported to be its first human patient, according to a study released in the Lancet Respiratory Medicine today.

Earlier this spring, the Taiwanese woman came to the hospital with flu-like symptoms and a shortness of breath. A throat swab sent to the Taiwan Centres For Disease Control helped scientists identify H6N1, a subtype of avian flu that has been spreading in chickens.

Another type of bird flu, H7N9, spread through China at the beginning of this year, passing between birds and humans, but so far hasn't progressed to spread as easily from person to person as H5N1, the strain that has killed more than 600 people since 1996.

Scientists have been working on developing a vaccine for H7N9, which is thought to have pandemic potential. Researchers from the Maryland-based pharmaceutical company Novavax reported in the New England Journal of Medicine yesterday that they've made progress on an H7N9 vaccine. A Swiss company, Novartis, has also announced that they've conducted positive clinical trials of an H7N9 vaccine.

Avian flu research was slowed by a worldwide moratorium on studying transmissible H5N1 in January 2012 after a genetic mutation was found that could make the flu able to easily pass among ferrets. Researchers got back to work examining risky mutations of the flu this January.

[AP via ABC News]


    







Fashion Camera Brings Primate Brains To The Internet

$
0
0

A primate brain, ready for its close-up.
StyleShoots

Macaque anatomist Roxana Kooijmans wants you to know about her brains. Kooijmans is a coordinator at the Primate Brain Bank, a non-profit organization that provides brain tissue to researchers who study how primate brains work. The brain bank had potential to be an invaluable scientific resource, but it had a flaw: most scientists—including those in its Netherlands hometown—had no idea it existed. 

The solution to the 13-year-old organization's obscurity problem came from an unlikely place: online shopping. 

To publicize the bank's collection of brains, Kooijmans needed high-quality photographs—not the sparse anatomy drawings that were all that existed at the time (As Kooijmans tells Popular Science, "nothing has the impact of a real brain.") But turning the Primate Brain Bank into a digital photographic database for scientists (and average people who are interested in monkey brains) quickly became a logistical nightmare. She needed photographs with nothing in the background, that could also show scale—from the giant gorilla brain to the tiny lemur brain. When she was telling her developer husband about these parameters, he mentioned a new machine for which he was helping to develop an iPad app.

Primate brain photo shoot in action
StyleShoots

The machine comes from a company called StyleShoots. And as the name suggests, it is used to photograph clothes for the fashion industry. When e-commerce ballooned, there was a need for clear photos of garments with no background imagery to post on companies' websites. Editing out backgrounds caused inefficiency, so in came StyleShoots. The machine is basically a giant a glass table with a cage of lights and a beam overtop that houses the camera. A Mac Mini provides the power, and a 5D Canon camera, complete with an L lens and motorized zoom, works the imaging. This hardware all communicates with an iPad, which acts almost like a remote control, and guides the user through the photographing process. 

Such a setup works great for clothes, but it was also exactly what Kooijmans and the Primate Brain Bank needed. "It was quite an interesting request, " says Anders Jorgensen, head of product development at StyleShoots. "We had been testing with a lot of products, like jeans, pullover sweaters and shirts. It never occurred to us we would be using it with brains." 

"We had been testing with jeans, pullover sweaters and shirts. It never occurred to us we would be using it with brains."

To bring the brains to the people, this summer, over the course of two hours, the team—complete with lab coats—photographed 46 brains using the StyleShoots photo machine. In doing so, they created perhaps the largest digital photographic primate brain database available to the public. The results are browsable at the Primate Brain Bank's website, which re-launched this summer. Kooijmans and her team are working on making the site into a comprehensive primate and primate brain resource, enlisting help from specialists in the field. 

A large part of the brain bank's service is providing tissue samples to researchers who are studying things such as comparing how new proteins are expressed in brains that are evolutionarily similar to humans. The Primate Brain Bank receives its brains from zoo or park donations, from animals that died of natural causes, or those that had to be euthanized for reasons other than obtaining their brain tissue. But given the small size of the field, such sample requests only happen a few times every year. To fill the time in between, they're turning to other means in order to spread more information about these brains. 

"When you talk about the brain, it's interesting. But when you can show students a real brain, they're completely amazed. It's a completely new dimension," Kooijmans says.

You can watch the photo shoot in action here:

 

 


    






Cognitive Computing For All: IBM Releases a Legion of Watsons

$
0
0

IBM Watson

 

Watson is dead. IBM’s Jeopardy-winning computer, whose calculations resided on a custom-built bank of servers roughly the size of a master bedroom, is no more.

But Watson has descendants. They’re also called Watson, and they are legion. Some of those Watsons will grow up to be medical experts. Other Watsons will become health and wellness coaches, motivating humans to become better humans. Still other Watsons will strive to be the best, and most attentive of personal shoppers. Those last Watsons won’t understand the sad trombone noise you’re mentally conjuring. But explain it, and they must might.

Maybe I should explain.

IBM announced today that it has opened up Watson to developers, including access to an API (or application programming interface) and tools for incorporating its cognitive computing into existing software. What Watson did on TV in 2011, crushing two quiz show champions with its encyclopedic knowledge and rapid response time, and what it’s doing for cancer researchers, scanning through whole archives of medical records and journaled papers, actually reading and understanding the text, as opposed to simply collecting excerpts based on keywords, it can now do for whoever’s willing to buy access.

So far, the examples of API-based applications provided by IBM are more interesting from a business standpoint than a technological one. Welltok’s CafeWell Concierge app will create personalized “Intelligent Health Itineraries” that help the user manage specific conditions, and provide rewards for good eating, exercise, and other behaviors. The Fluid Expert Personal Shopper from Fluid Retail will act as an online sales associate, interacting with customers with text and speech. The app can effectively chat with the customer about where he or she is going, what sorts of activities are planned, and then pull up relevant products, reviews and suggestions. As with WellTok’s coach, Fluid’s shopper is learning about the specific person it's serving, and applying that knowledge as it goes.

More exciting that the apps, though, is why they’re possible. Watson isn’t learning like a machine, gathering and regurgitating data within rigidly defined rules and interfaces. It’s not, for example, requiring that you fill out questionnaires and then make your own way through search results. You’re talking to it—either out loud, or through text—and it’s making logical connections, and coming to conclusions, which it presents in the same sort of conversational language that humans use.

The approach is called cognitive computing, which might sound like yet another buzzy term used to oversell so-called intelligent software. But Watson is the real deal: software that learns. “I don’t program it at all,” says John Gordon, VP of IBM Watson. “I feed it info, I give it practice tests, and I score it. And Watson figures out, on its own, how to learn from its mistakes.”

Gordon compares Watson’s training process to helping his kids with their homework. Instead of digging into the code to upgrade and improve the system’s ability to understand and interact with people, he gives it data, and sometimes discusses it, and Watson gets better. That person-like capacity to learn applies both to its linguistic and interactive algorithms, as well as its book smarts—it can absorb roughly 1 million books worth of content.

In a general sense, this is no different from how programmers worked on the Jeopardy-winning version of Watson, back when it was tied to a specific, room-size assortment of hardware. But today’s Watson lives in an online-accessible IBM Power server—the size of about three pizza boxes, says Gordon—and can interact with multiple users at once, as opposed to one. Much of the system’s calculations now happen in the cloud, and depending on the applications that are tapping into it, the Watson that helps you shop at TheNorthFace.com (the only partner that Fluid has announced), or that tells you how to cope with a chronic condition, will be inherently different from all the other Watsons helping all the other people. That’s why Watson, the Jeopardy champ is dead. Long live its progeny, an army of Watsons with their own unique and evolving knowledge bases. It’s closer to a new species of intelligence computer than a single platform.

To answer the obvious robophobic question: “We don’t have one super Watson that knows everything that every computer puts back into it,” says Gordon. What happens to those individual Watsons, and to the data they collect—much of which will be intensely personal—is up to developers. In some cases, IBM will ask for feedback from partners to help train its core interaction algorithms. So the more humans deal with Watson, the smarter its localized iterations will definitely become, and the better its cognitive functions might become.

IBM won’t speculate on the kinds of disruptive capabilities it would like to see from Watson-powered developers. But however you want to spin this news, as another sign of the coming Singularity, or fabulous news for indecisive North Face customers, it’s clear that cognitive computing isn’t just here. In the post-Watson-API world, it’s everywhere.

 

 


    






Against Medical Recommendations, FDA Approves Potent New Painkiller

$
0
0

Hydrocodone
DEA

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention considers prescription painkiller overdoses a public health epidemic, calling prescription drug abuse the "fastest growing drug problem in the United States." Opioid painkillers like OxyContin and Vicodin are the leading cause of fatal drug overdoses, which have risen dramatically over the past few decades.

And now the FDA has approved an even more addictive pill. Medical experts warned the agency that Zohydro, an opiod painkiller that contains an unusually high dose of hydrocodone—up to 10 times more than Vicodin—has high potential for abuse. This is the first hydrocodone drug the FDA has approved that isn't diluted with another painkiller like acetaminophen, which can make opioid medications less addictive but also can cause liver damage. Oxycontin, which similarly contains the undiluted opioid oxycodone, has high rates of abuse and overdose. 

See the full story from Mother Jones.


    






Stanley Gift Guide [SPONSORED GALLERY]

The World's Oldest Animal Is Even Older Than We Thought

$
0
0

Ming
Bangor University

Here you see Ming, a mollusk of the species Arctica islandica. In 2006, researchers discovered the bivalve in Iceland, and examined its interior growth rings--patterns on the inside of its shell--to determine its age. That put Ming at an impressive 405 years old, making it the oldest-known animal. (It was named after the Ming Dynasty, the period between 1368 and 1644.) But now researchers are reporting it's more than an entire century older than that: a healthy 507 years young.

What changed? Well, originally, researchers counted the rings on its shell, which usually provides an accurate count, since the clams produce another ring each summer. This time, though, the rings were so compressed there was apparently a miscount. A new count of rings on the exterior, confirmed by carbon dating, gave the new age. The team also cross-checked the rings against rings from similar organisms that lived in the same environment. (Ming's slow metabolism is what allows it to survive for so long.) 

More than just a record-breaker, creatures like this can give researchers clues about climate change: the growth rings change based on the temperature of the ocean each year. 

Unfortunately, Ming died in the original study back in 2006. (You will find a totally absurd article blaming the scientists for that here. That spin on the story is floating around. Actually, do not click that.) But there are a lot of other examples of A. islandica out there, and, as scientists pointed out to ScienceNordic, it's not unlikely that an even older one has been found and not properly researched. Plus, depending on how complicated you like your organisms, Ming might not be the oldest. Still! Let's not mitigate this impressive feat.

[ScienceNordic]


    






Viewing all 20161 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images