Quantcast
Channel: Popular Science | RSS
Viewing all 20161 articles
Browse latest View live

10-Foot Sea Level Rise Now Unstoppable Due To Glacier Collapse

$
0
0

Thwaites glacier
NASA/JPL

A large part of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, a massive expanse of frozen water that flows into the Amundsen Sea, is likely already in the process of collapsing, probably irreversibly. A pair of studies show that part of the sheet is melting more quickly than previously thought, and that several of its large glaciers will probably melt into the ocean, raising global sea levels at least 10 feet in the coming centuries. And it cannot be stopped.

The first study, to be published May 16 in the journal Science, suggests that the Thwaites Glacier, a relatively fast-moving part of the ice sheet, will likely melt away into the ocean within several centuries, enough by itself to raise sea levels 2 feet. Another study to be published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters looked more broadly at Thwaites and other glaciers bordering the Amundsen Sea, and likewise concluded they are collapsing.

The term "collapsing" is perhaps not the best one, because it implies something sudden. These glaciers are expected to melt in the next several centuries, and both studies suggest there is little chance that their runaway melt and slide into the sea will slow down. While not sudden in normal everyday language, it is still quite rapid in geological terms. 

The second study, done in part by NASA researchers, concerns three lines of evidence--collected over the last 40 years--that suggest the glaciers will soon melt away: the changes in their flow speeds, how much of each glacier floats on seawater, and the slope of the terrain they are flowing over and its depth below sea level. Regarding the first, they are flowing more quickly toward sea than before, and this pace is accelerating. Likewise, the amount of floating ice is increasing, and the shape of the sea floor under the ice doesn't appear capable of stopping this increased flow. Specifically, the "grounding line"--where the glaciers cease to lay atop land, and begin rather to float over water, is moving inland quicker than thought, an observation reached by satellite measurements.

Part of the reason this is happening, the researchers think, is because melting makes the ice weigh less, thus causing more of it to float rather than rest on the sea floor. (And as you probably know, floating ice displaces as much water as melted ice.) 

"The collapse of this sector of West Antarctica appears to be unstoppable," said Eric Rignot, a UC Irvine glaciologist who is also with NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, in a statement. "The fact that the retreat is happening simultaneously over a large sector suggests it was triggered by a common cause, such as an increase in the amount of ocean heat beneath the floating parts of the glaciers. At this point, the end appears to be inevitable."

For more on what the studies say, head over the NBC News









Do We Need A 'Magna Cortica' For Brain Rights?

$
0
0

Medi-Mation

If you could permanently change your brain to work better, would you? Or, maybe more importantly, would you have the right to?

Over at The Atlantic, there's an excellent rundown of think-tank the Institute for the Future's forecasts for the next 10 years, but one of the most fascinating is the idea of a "Magna Cortica": a document that would legally protect the right to cognitive enhancement. Mood pills, brain stimulation, genetic modification -- what should we be allowed to do to ourselves?

Institute for the Future distinguished fellow Jamais Cascio drew up this rough list:

1. The right to self-knowledge

2. The right to self-modification

3. The right to refuse modification

4. The right to modify/refuse to modify your children

5. The right to know who has been modified

You'll notice immediately: it's not question of if this should be permitted, but to what extent. As Cascio makes the point to The Atlantic's Alexis Madrigal: "Are we going to treat this like doping in sports, and create a criminal culture around it? Do we treat it as another version of a cell phone?"

As simple as those five items are, the implications of each are radical -- and controversial. Each of these could be the starting point of a metaphysical sci-fi novel: What unforeseen consequences will come from modifying ourselves? Do we have a right to modify our children, who, under the law, can't really consent to such procedures? If we were to draw up a modification database, what would we do with that information?

To be sure, it doesn't seem like Cascio is suggesting these are hard and fast rules. They're a starting point point for a productive conversation; Cascio calls them the Magna Cortica version 0.1. But if straightforward ideas like this still seem fraught and unwieldy, we have a long way to go before we come to any conclusions.

[The Atlantic]








Electrical Stimulation Of Brain Could Induce Lucid Dreaming

$
0
0

In case you hadn't heard, stimulation of the brain with mild electrical currents can in some people induce lucid dreaming: the ability to become self-aware in dreams, and to sometimes control them. 

In the study, the scientists, led by Ursula Voss at the J.W. Goethe University in Frankfurt, Germany, stimulated sleepers' brains using a weak current set to a particular frequency, in a technique called transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). Christian Jarrett at Wired has a good rundown of the study

...it turns out that, aside from a small sample, this new dream research is well conducted. Voss and her team tested 27 healthy volunteers (15 women, 12 men, none of whom usually have lucid dreams) on four successive nights. Each night, the participants were zapped with electricity in a different frequency range or – and it’s important they included this condition – with no electricity at all (known as a “sham” treatment). The stimulation was delivered after between two and three minutes of uninterrupted REM sleep. Shortly afterwards the participants were woken and they answered questions about the dream they’d just had.

The main result is that stimulation specifically delivered in the low gamma range, at 40Hz, and to a lesser extent at 25Hz, was associated with a greater experience of lucid dreaming, as compared to stimulation at other higher and lower frequencies or to sham treatment. “Our experiment is, to the best of our knowledge, the first to demonstrate altered conscious awareness as a direct consequence of induced gamma-band oscillations during sleep,” the researchers concluded.

The researchers define lucid dreams as those in which participants have higher self-reported scores in three areas: self-awareness of dreaming (insight), taking on a third-person perspective (dissociation), and--most intriguing to me--control over one's dreams. As Virginia Hughes wrote at National Geographic, 40 Hz was the "sweet spot" for average scores on these measures. 

However, the ability to control one's dreams spiked at 25 Hz, and showed no increase at 40 Hz. This suggests, as the researchers wrote, "25-Hz oscillatory activity may be functionally distinct from 40-Hz activity." That's really important if you want to be able to control your dreams. Participants experienced 25 Hz or 40 Hz zaps on separate occasions to tell the difference between them. 

I doubt I'm wrong in assuming that control is probably the most desired aspect of lucid dreaming--and is often considered to be intrinsic to lucid dreaming.  This study suggests that there may be something that is distinct about control, or at least that it is elicited in a different way.  I'd be willing to bet that those dreams in which the sleepers took control were more exciting to experience.

While we're on the topic of lucid dreams, here's a Popular Science story from January 2012 about how it is possible to control your dreams, without electricity but with practice. 

The study was published May 11 in the journal Nature Neuroscience.








Has The End Of The Banana Arrived?

$
0
0

Two weeks ago, at a conference in South Africa, scientists met to discuss how to contain a deadly banana disease outbreak in nearby Mozambique, Africa. At fault was a fungus that continues its march around the planet. In recent years, it has spread across Asia and Australia, devastating plants there that bear the signature yellow supermarket fruit.

The international delegation of researchers shared their own approaches to the malady, hoping to arrive at some strategy to insulate Mozambique and the rest of Africa: a continent where bananas are essential to the lives of millions. They left the Cape Town-based meeting with an air of optimism.

Only days after the meeting, however, a devastating new survey of the stricken Mozambique farm was released. Scientists at the conference assumed that the fungus was limited to a single plot. The new report suggested the entire plantation was infested, expanding 125 diseased acres to more than 3,500. All told, 7 million banana plants were doomed to wilt and rot.

“The future looks bleak,” says Altus Viljoen, the South African plant pathologist who organized the conference. "There’s no way they’ll be able to stop any further spread if they continue to farm.” Worse, he says, the disease's rapid spread endangers banana crops beyond Mozambique’s borders.

A banana production line in Mozambique.
Fen Beed
The story of the African farm is the story of a threat to the world’s largest fruit crop. Commercially, bananas generate $8 billion annually and, according to the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, more than 400 million people rely on the fruit as their primary source of calories. Though more bananas are grown in Asia, Africans depend heavily on the crop; in countries like Rwanda and Uganda, for example, average banana consumption is about 500 pounds per person annually, or 20 times that of the typical American. If the bananas vanish, people starve.

I originally reported on the malady that’s now infecting the Mozambique plantation in the August 2005 print edition of Popular Science. In that story, which is still relevant today, I described a fungus, commonly known as “Panama Disease” but scientifically termed Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cubensis Tropical Race 4 (or “Foc-TR4”). It infects the roots of banana plants, moves upward through the xylem, and clogs the flow of sap, causing leaves to wilt and the plant to rot.

When I reported on the disease, which was and remains incurable, it had spread only to a few Asian nations, including Taiwan and Indonesia. But it soon reached the Chinese mainland, and then jumped across thousands of miles of open ocean to appear in Australia, where it devastated the banana industry in the Darwin region.

The most astonishing thing is that this has happened before, with a breed of banana introduced to America and Europe in the early 20th century. Called the Gros Michel, it was entirely different from the kind of banana we enjoy today and made the fortunes of Chiquita and Dole. These companies created an agricultural business model based on monoculture, whose singular focus resembles the fast food industry more than traditional farming.

The “Big Mike” cultivar soon began succumbing to a variant of Fusarium now known as “Race 1.” By 1960, the breed was functionally extinct. Its replacement is today’s supermarket banana, called the Cavendish. From the start banana marketers considered it an inferior product—less flavorful and more perishable. Yet facing bankruptcy in the wake of the Gros Michel’s disappearance, they adopted it at the last minute to save their industry.

I became so fascinated with bananas that my original article became a book in 2008: Banana: The Fate of the Fruit that Changed the World. Since then, I’ve traveled the world writing about bananas, learning about how important, delicious, and threatened they are. I attended the South Africa conference, officially titled the “Regional Meeting To Develop A Strategy To Mitigate Foc TR4 In Africa,” and was impressed with the organization and commitment exhibited by the working group.

Then the bad news came.

***

Mozambique is not considered prime banana territory. The food is mostly a commercial crop here, rather than a staple. But it is well placed if one wanted to start an export business; bananas could be shipped north, to Middle Eastern and European markets. At least that was the plan when the now-stricken crops were planted in 2008.

The funding came from Chiquita, the world’s largest and oldest banana producer. Expectations were high. Operations in the nation could soon account for as much as 30 percent of the company’s $2 billion supermarket banana business, according to then-CEO Fernando Aguirre. The plantation would keep world banana supplies and prices stable, and would also provide huge local benefits, adding as many as 3,000 jobs to the regional economy. In 2010, Chiquita left Mozambique, claiming that it couldn’t get high enough quality fruit from the operation, and that northbound shipments were too threatened by piracy along the African coast.

A Mozambique banana plantation.
Altus Viljoen

One big question is how the disease actually arrived in Mozambique. At the conference I attended, participants offered two theories. One is that Philippine workers who’d arrived to help build the plantation inadvertently brought it in; the malady is so virulent that a single clump of dirt on a shoe or a tool can lead to continent-wide infection. Philippine banana growers have been struggling with Foc-TR4 since the 1990s, and the workers in Mozambique were employed by Chiquita management and then by a company called Matanuska, which took over when the American banana company left.

Another idea is that the disease was waiting in the soil all along, prior to the arrival of bananas in Mozambique. Scientists think this happened in Malaysia when Cavendish were planted there in the late 1980s, leading to one of the earliest outbreaks of Foc-TR4. Researchers are now analyzing the strain of fungus found in Mozambique to see if it shares genetic markers with samples gathered elsewhere. (Viljoen strongly believes those tests will show that the disease came from the Philippines.)

Whatever the origin, it is certain that the new plantation was poorly equipped to handle the fungus. On multiple plots in the Mozambique farms, plants were sharing water drainage facilities, a practice that might allow contaminated water to spread from one plot to another. Likewise, infection from common irrigation sources was one of the primary ways the Gros Michel version of Panama Disease spread in the mid-20th century.

Another likely vector for the spread of the disease was local people walking across the farmland on their way home, says Viljoen. At April’s Cape Town meeting, Jack Dwyer, CEO of the Mozambique plantation venture, acknowledged that more than 2,500 people entered and exited the farm each day, along with 100 vehicles.

An infected banana plant.
Altus Viljoen

All this has made the banana industry take notice. Just five years ago, Chiquita’s Aguirre told the Cincinnati Enquirer, “We believe that [Panama Disease] is a very limited threat and would take many, many years to spread, even if it does move out of Asia.” Following the news from Mozambique, Chiquita took a more realistic stance. Spokesperson Ed Loyd told me that, “It would be foolish not to pay attention,” and that Panama Disease represents a long-term danger to the industry. (The disease has also recently been identified in the Middle East, with crops stricken in both Jordan and Oman.)

Loyd also confirmed that Chiquita is now researching a replacement banana for the Cavendish. One possibility is a modified version of the fruit developed in Taiwan; the “GCTCV 219” is sweeter than standard Cavendish, and takes a little longer to harvest, but is highly resistant to Panama Disease. The variety is currently being tested in the Philippines and Australia, and it has the market advantage of not being a GMO banana; the technique used to develop it involves “somoclonal variation,” or hand-selection and rebreeding of hardier varieties. (The problem with GMO bananas isn’t the fruit or the technology, it’s that most consumers wouldn’t buy them, banana marketers say.) Other possibilities include alternate breeds. Those would require new packaging technology, but the industry overcame that obstacle during the original Gros Michel changeover. Or, if consumer and regulatory resistance breaks down, a transgenic banana, perhaps crossed with Fusarium-resistant peppers.

The best solution, banana scientists have told me, is variety. Turning the commercial banana crop from a monoculture (in which every Cavendish plant is essentially a clone) to one with multiple resistant breeds would help insulate plantations against disease and also bring some really delicious fruit to consumers. The Cavendish, I can tell you from experience, is a lousy tasting banana compared to just about everything else; in India, where 600 banana varieties are grown, Cavendish is derisively called “the hotel banana.”

Does all this mean the great "bananapocalypse" or "bananageddon" is here? Not yet. But it is getting closer. Currently, about 45 percent of world banana production is Cavendish, and the global export of the crop is growing by about 7 percent annually. As its monoculture spreads, the threat to both livelihoods and lives grows. (There is some good news for subsistence crops: Recent tests of Africa’s most-consumed varieties indicate they could be resistant to Foc-TR4, although researchers say more studies are required.)

For Americans worried about whether they’ll continue to have slices of banana floating in their cereal bowls, the question is when the disease will hit Latin America, which grows the bananas we consume. Mozambique brings disturbing news on that front: Farm managers there didn’t just get assistance from the Philippines, but also from Costa Rica and several other Central American nations. Those workers moved repeatedly between their home countries and Africa through 2011.

With an incubation period of about two to three years, it is possible that the same mechanism that likely caused the African outbreak—infected dirt, carried inadvertently—is already at work in our hemisphere. “The workers who set up those plantations are now back home,” says Randy Ploetz, the Florida-based plant pathologist who first identified Foc-TR4 in the 1980s. “So if we assume it is fairly easy to move this thing and soil from wherever it is—Southeast Asia or Jordan or Mozambique—then it is possible it is already in Latin America. Only time will tell.”








Will Russia Colonize The Moon?

$
0
0

Scale drawing of 1960s Soviet and American lunar landing craft
Lunar Landers of the 1960s
This drawing shows the scale of the Soviet LK lunar landing craft next to the American LM (lunar module). The LK never made it to the Moon, as the Soyuz program missions that would have carried it were cancelled.

Russia should prioritize creating a moon base with full-time residents by mid-century, according to a plan created by Moscow State University, the Russian Academy of Sciences, and the firm Roscosmos.

According to the Russian newspaper Izvestia, the proposal argues that Russia needs to get a geopolitical leg up on rivals for potentially sizable lunar deposits of minerals such as aluminum, titanium, and iron. It envisions a public-private partnership covering the roughly $816 million cost of a three-stage colonization effort.

First, from 2016 to 2025, a series of robotic explorers would go to the moon to make new and detailed surveys of mineral and water resources.

Then, between 2028 and 2030, manned expeditions would orbit the moon without landing (it's not explained why); and from 2030 to 2040, a series of manned missions would construct a permanent base for housing a “lunar astronomical observatory, as well as monitoring of the Earth.”

“The moon is the first step on the way to deep space,” Izvestia quotes Ivan Moiseyev, head of the Russia's Institute of Space Policy, because staging missions from the moon will be easier (and cheaper) than lifting heavy interplanetary payloads out of the Earth's gravity and atmosphere.

The Russian language article, "Russia will begin colonization of the Moon by 2030," was summarized in English last week by The Moscow Times.








This Tiny Drone Can Climb Walls

$
0
0

Parrot MiniDrone
Photography by Brian Klutch
When designers at Parrot shrank the AR.Drone to the size of a softball, they had to make some sacrifices—namely autonomous flying and a live camera feed. But they made up for the losses with something better: the ability to climb walls and scurry across ceilings. Stabilized by an accelerometer and gyroscope, and guided by a downward-facing camera and ultrasonic sensor, the MiniDrone rests inside a pair of six-inch wheels. The carbon fiber frame enables the drone to roll over any flat surface. Plus, it absorbs any unintended impact, a perk for shaky pilots.

Parrot MiniDrone

Range: 160 feet

Battery life: 7 minutes

Price: not set

Available:late 2014 

This article originally appeared in the May 2014 issue of Popular Science.








Farewell To H.R. Giger, Architect Of Our Nightmares

$
0
0

H.R. Giger
Wikimedia Commons

In my mind, the only way to watch Alien is in a dark room, where the only source of light is the TV or the laptop as you're taken on the nightmare tour of a brooding spaceship. This is, I think, how H.R. Giger, the Swiss surrealist artist who created the xenomorph of the Alien franchise, would've wanted it.

Giger died in the hospital Monday at the age of 74There will be countless eulogies pouring in today for the man, which is surprising, maybe, considering the collective nightmares he imprinted on (now multiple) generations of science fiction fans. But there may not be anyone who deserves the recognition more. 

A sculptor, painter, album designer, and, finally, set designer, Giger created a dark vision of the future that would seem at odds with most sci-fi of its day. Alien followed the crew of the spaceship Nostromo, as it's invaded by a creature that slowly, viciously, and assuredly begins hunting and killing them. Released in 1979, it preceded the other great, brooding film of its time, Blade Runner, by three years, but the two works couldn't be more different. While Blade Runner imagined a future Los Angeles that was expansive and melancholy, Alien was a haunted house film that only happened to take place on a spaceship -- it had the metallic surfaces of other movies, but the creeping menace of the film was an otherworldly horror, a gross hiccup of evolution. If most films saw mechanization as the spector of the future, Giger saw it in biology; indeed, Giger was reportedly only in charge on creating the "alien" aspects of the film, as opposed to the industrial settings. Today's crop of sci-fi films, I'd argue, borrow more heavily from the epic rather than the claustrophobic feel Giger helped mold. Still, though: if his vision is underrepresented, it's because so few could match it in scope.

You could attribute much of that aesthetic to the director of Alien, Ridley Scott, and later, in the first sequel, to James Cameron, but you can't underestimate the inherent grotesqueness of Giger's creation. Test footage from the film was uncovered a while back, and even outside the actual movie, the creature is unnerving. (No small wonder it launched so many adaptations in comics and other mediums.)

 

 

How did he do it? Many remarked on the disturbing sexual imagery of the alien and other designs, and that's likely part of it, if a little Freudian. But it's easier to say this: he was an artist in every sense. The design for the film's so-called "chestburster" -- the young alien that burrows inside and breaks through a character's chest -- was based on artist Francis Bacon's abstract painting Three Studies for Figures at the Base of a Crucifixion. If any others films about creatures from another world devouring hapless space miners were inspired by post-war fine art, please inform the Ph.D students, because they have a thesis on their hands.

There's one more reason Giger's xenomorph stays with us: It's that voice of the unknown that haunts all exploration, whether in space, or scientific research back on Earth. While most dystopian works have focused on the worst possible consequences of what we were already creating -- nuclear power, say, or cloning  -- Giger perhaps understood that the real terror in the modern world was what we couldn't predict, and what we weren't prepared to understand.  

The alien spends the vast majority of the film encased in shadow; we get a glimpse here, a quick shot there, until the harrowing end. If I watch the movie in the dark, with only the light from a screen, maybe it's because I'm convinced I'll catch a glimpse of something I've never seen before.








Toothy Fish With Jutting Jaw Confounds Science

$
0
0

Smile!
Kryptoglanis shajii has quite a strange jaw skeleton, and a winning grin.
Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel Unversity

A newfound catfish from India doesn't look so remarkable from the outside, besides its prominent whiskers. Its size--slightly smaller than an average human pinkie finger--is unexceptional. And it is rarely seen, known to live in water deep underground, although it occasionally turns up in rice paddies and drinking wells. 

But when researchers took a CAT scan of Kryptoglanis shajii specimens, they were shocked by its odd bones. Perhaps most unusual is its teeth and jaw skeleton. It boasts four rows of sharp conical teeth, and a lower jaw that juts out--sort of like a bulldog. It also lacks certain bones, which are replaced by cartilage. The skeleton is "completely unique among catfishes and all fishes as far as I know," said study co-author John Lundberg, emeritus curator of Ichthyology at the Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University, in a statement.

Why is the jaw so oddly shaped? Lundberg said it may be modified to eat certain animals like invertebrates, but they aren't sure. "In dogs that [jutting-out jaw] was the result of selective breeding," he noted. "In Kryptoglanis, we don’t know yet what in their natural evolution would have led to this modified shape."

So many questions. For example: Why does Kryptoglanis smile so much? Is it eager to eat insect larvae, or does it derive sinister fascination from how much its taxonomy puzzles scientists? (This is not a question the scientists are asking.)

Whiskered one
Is it just me, or does it look like the little brute is smiling?
Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel Unversity

Researchers from Drexel and elsewhere are now trying to find out how it is related to other known catfishes, but so far that are stumped.

The study, charmingly titled "A tomographic osteology of the taxonomically puzzling catfish Kryptoglanis shajii," was published recently in the journal Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia.

Little fish
Kryptoglanis shajii is slightly smaller than a human pinkie finger.
Kyle Luckenbill, Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University

The creature was uncovered in the Western Ghats, a biodiversity hotspot in western India that recently turned up a new species of "dancing" frogs.

Here's a video that show the skeleton more clearly. 









Soon, Everything Will Be A Charger

$
0
0

The number of connected devices will exceed the world’s population—more than seven billion—by the end of this year, according to recent Cisco research. But even though they make our lives easier, gadgets come with something pretty unattractive: an ever-growing tangle of chargers. Wireless charging was supposed to fix that, and soon it actually will.

It’s been about five years since companies first adapted wireless charging to work with mobile devices, but obstacles, including a long-standing war over transmission standards, have continued to hold the system back from wider adoption. One of the biggest ongoing issues is integration. Wireless chargers are still, well, chargers; they just replace a plug with a pad. Not to mention, only a handful of phones—including the Nokia Lumia 720 and the Google Nexus 5—come pre-equipped to receive power wirelessly.

Last year, Powermat began to move things in the right direction. They launched a pilot program to embed charging surfaces in tables and countertops in commercial spaces, such as Starbucks and Madison Square Garden. The next step is to bring that same level of integration into the home. Manufacturers have started to include charging pads in lamps, clocks, and even car consoles; in other words, things that are plugged in to begin with. So as companies continue to make our army of devices compatible with wireless charging, powering them up will become as attractive as the gadgets themselves. 

 

1) Teknion Conflux:

$892

2) JBL PowerUp Wireless Charging Speaker:

From $149.5

3) Glowdeck:

$195 

This article originally appeared in the May 2014 issue of Popular Science. 








This Microchip Heart Has A Rare Genetic Disease

$
0
0

photo of an organ-on-a-chip
Organ-on-a-Chip
This chip device is not the same as the heart-on-a-chip described below. This device was made by the Wyss Institute, which was involved in making the heart chip.
Wyss Institute

It doesn't look much like a heart, but it works—a little bit—like one. Researchers have created a microchip heart that has a rare genetic disease. Using the chip, the researchers were able to learn some basics about the disease, called Barth syndrome, that scientists didn't know before.

These results are a step forward for Barth syndrome research, of course. The syndrome, usually found in boys, causes enlarged, weakened hearts; muscle weakness; and immune system trouble. It has no cure. The research also happens to show off a fascinating application for organs-on-a-chip, a technology that engineers developed in recent years to study human biology in an entirely new way.

To make organs-on-a-chip, engineers gather cells from people and spread them inside little plastic squares similar in size to computer microchips. The organs-on-a-chip often have minuscule sensors and tubing so that scientists are able to pump chemicals into them and measure different results. For example, scientists could pump medicine into an organ-on-a-chip and see how cells react. The chips are supposed to be an alternative to doing tests in lab animals. They have their advantages and disadvantages, compared to lab animals. One thing's for sure: They are much cooler than lab rats.

When the heart cells beat strongly enough, the whole chip bent.

To make Barth-syndrome chips, researchers from the U.S. and Europe took skin biopsies from two people with Barth syndrome. The researchers transformed the skin cells into stem cells, and from there into heart cells that could beat on their own. Even after all those transformations, the cells still had the same genes they originally did—including the one faulty gene that causes Barth syndrome. That gene is important to making mitochondria, specialized structures that appear in every cell.

The researchers put the Barth-syndrome heart cells into their chips, which were made of soft plastic. When the heart tissue beat strongly enough, the whole chip bent. The researchers measured the bend of the chip to calculate how strongly the heart cells worked.

From the chip experiments and others, the Barth syndrome researchers learned that the Barth-syndrome gene, which appears on the X chromosome, caused heart cells to beat more weakly. You can see typical heart cells on a chip, compared to the barely-beating the Barth-syndrome heart cells, below. Both sets of cells were made from skin cells, turned into stem cells, turned into heart cells:

 


Megan McCain and Kevin Kit Parker/Wyss Institute

 

The Barth-syndrome gene also made the heart cells produce an excess of chemicals called reactive oxygen species. On the other hand, clearing out the excess reactive oxygen species helped the heart cells beat more normally. "Now, whether that can be achieved in an animal model or a patient is a different story, but if that could be done, it would suggest a new therapeutic angle," William Pu, the research's lead scientist and a cardiologist at Boston Children's Hospital, said in a statement.

Pu and his colleagues published their work on Monday, in the journal Nature Medicine.








Report: U.S. Military Needs More Drones, Not Better Ones

$
0
0

MQ-9 Reaper drone comes into land at Kandahar Airbase in Helmand, Afghanistan
Fg Off Owen Cheverton/Ministry of Defense, UK

American military involvement in Afghanistan is winding down. The production run of the MQ-1 Predator, an unmanned surveillance aircraft adapted to carry missiles and strike targets from above, is over. This poses a question for military planners: What kind of drone will the U.S. Air Force need next? A new report, published last Friday by the think tank Rand Corporation, says the answer is more of the same.

Rand researchers used a computer simulation to test three drone concepts of varying size, plus the existing MQ-9 Reaper. The tests focused on the drones' ability to destroy a moving target. The Reaper, it's worth noting, is an evolution of the MQ-1 Predator, and has already fulfilled this role in both Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as in other countries where the U.S. operates drones.

Here are the lessons learned, in handy bullet point format.

  • No one drone is best at everything
  • More drones are better than one drone
  • Overall, the MQ-9 Reaper currently in service does its job the best
  • Improving Reaper sensors is probably an easier and fix than designing a new drone for the job

Rather than calculate whether or not a drone concept carried sufficient weapons to destroy a target, the test rated the ability of a drone to track a target until a weapon was available—a distinction that gave the smaller drones, which have a harder time carrying weapons, a fair shot. The logic behind this is that if a smaller drone can follow a vehicle for long enough, another vehicle, such as a bomber or a tank, could step in to destroy it.

Here's the description of the role, in pitch-perfect, sterile bureaucratese:

The hunter-killer mission is understood best not as a specific mission but as a class of missions in which aircraft hunt for and ultimately kill a specific individual target on the ground. One or more aircraft may participate in the search; the search area may be large or small; the target may be mobile or stationary or may exhibit more-complex behaviors; the [Rules of Engagement] may be loose or restrictive; and the environmental conditions can vary greatly.

The sensor systems used in the simulation varied by the size of the drone, and that had a major impact on the results. Smaller drones, with lighter and fewer sensors, had to fly below cloud cover, or else risk losing targets, but larger drones could fly above clouds and still track vehicles just fine. The heart of the report analyzes specific sensors, weather combinations, and tracking patterns, but the real meat of it comes at the end, when the authors discuss how many drones it takes to successfully complete a mission.

Reapers, and most other large drones, are capable of tracking and destroying targets on their own, and get even better at it when used in pairs. Smaller drones are sometimes successful when flying alone, but their effectiveness improves greatly when used in twos and threes. And yet, even the improved abilities of three small drones working together usually isn't enough to match a single Reaper. This is especially true in difficult, foggy or cloudy weather, and at night, which is when the Air Force prefers to launch drone strikes.

There's one hugecaveat on all this

We assumed that the pilot would not divert to follow a target unless the sensor operator could confirm to a high degree of certainty (i.e., by identifying the target) that it was the right one...

If that assumption is wrong, it doesn't matter how many Reapers are used; getting accurate information to identify a target remains the most important and challenging part of America's targeted killing campaign.








Popular Photography Shares Tips On Capturing Storms

$
0
0

“Storm Over Field,” Lake Poinsett, SD, 2010. Canon EOS 5D Mark II, 24–105mm f/4L Canon lens; 1 sec at f/8, ISO 100.
Photo by Mitch Dobrowner







Defend Your Cubicle With A Nerf Sentry Gun

$
0
0

Photograph by Dan Bracaglia

Tell workplace pen thieves and pranksters how you really feel with a barrage of foam darts. This project hacks a Nerf gun to automatically fire at large heat signatures. Simply replace the toy’s trigger system with a servomotor, wire up a home security sensor, add an extended clip, and attach it all to a tripod. Anyone who steps into the sensor’s detection zone gets pelted with darts until they leave—or the clip runs out. Follow these instructions to deter would-be cubicle intruders. 

Materials:

  • Nerf N-Strike Elite Stryfe gun (with clip)
  • Servomotor with an X-shaped arm
  • Single pole single throw (SPST) reed relay
  • Passive infrared (PIR) sensor (with 9V battery)
  • Roll of 22-gauge hook-up wire
  • Tripod
  • ¼-inch nut and washer

Tools:

Phillips-head screwdriver, wire cutters, soldering iron

Instructions:

  1. Disassemble the Nerf gun with the screwdriver and study the location of the parts inside (see diagram below).
  2. Remove the electric trigger system, acceleration trigger, jam-clearing door, and one anti-jam feed finger from the muzzle. (You may need a knife.)
  3. Disable the jam-clearing door’s safety switch by removing the part and reinserting it backward into its slot.
  4. Solder the PIR to the SPST relay, and the SPST relay to the gun’s acceleration trigger switch (refer to the diagram below).
  5. Mount the servomotor inside the gun so that its X-shaped servo arm rotates within the dart breech and can push a dart into the rear of the muzzle.
  6. Solder the servomotor’s negative lead to the gun battery compartment’s negative terminal. Solder the output pole to the acceleration trigger switch.
  7. Fasten the PIR to the tactical rail on top of the gun and attach the tripod to the heel of the toy’s handgrip with the nut and washer.
  8. Reassemble the Nerf gun, aim the barrel (and sensor) at the usual point of intrusion, and dare your officemates to cross you again.

Diagram:

Anti-Jam Feed Fingers
Jam-Clearing Door Safety Switch
Trigger System

Acceleration Trigger Switch

 

Acceleration Trigger

Tips:

  • Insert the 9V battery into the PIR first and wait for the servomotor to stop spinning, then load a clip into the Nerf gun.
  • Do not use fully loaded clips. Rather, insert only half the required number of darts for each clip capacity (e.g., three darts inside the standard six-dart clip).
  • Once activated, the PIR has a refractory period of approximately two to five seconds during which time the sentry will not fire.
  • Alignment errors with the servomotor can cause dart jams. Gently tweak your alignment until the darts are fed into the acceleration motor smoothly.
  • Dart firing will be rapid and continuous until the PIR sensor no longer detects movement.

Approximate time to build this project: 4 hours

Cost: About $65

Difficulty: 4/5

WARNING: These instructions will remove important safety features, could ruin the toy, and might even start a foam-dart arms race.

This article originally appeared in the May 2014 issue of Popular Science.








E-Cigarettes Not Harmless, Should Be Regulated Like Cigs, Study Says

$
0
0

CNN / YouTube
E-cigarettes have only been around for about a decade, and it's not yet clear what all the health effects of "vaping" might be. But according to a comprehensive review of research on health effects and usage patterns of electronic cigarettes, they are certainly not "harmless water vapor" as many in the industry have claimed (also see for example this 'study,' published in part by a pro-vaping industry group, or manufacturer's claims that e-cigarettes are safe). It's also unclear if they help people quit smoking, as is often claimed. Many people use both e-cigs and tobacco cigarettes, for example using the former in indoor areas where the latter aren't allowed. For that reason, the researchers, from University of California, San Francisco, suggest they should be subject to the same laws and limitations as tobacco smokes. 

The review highlights studies suggesting that e-cigarettes are not harmless for users. In one study, people who vaped had increased exhaled levels of nitric oxide, attributed to lung inflammation. Another study found vaping had "adverse physiologic effects after short-term use that are similar to some of the effects seen with tobacco smoking," such as constricted airways. Furthermore, when heated and vaporized, propylene glycol--often used in e-cigarettes to form aerosol particles--can form propylene oxide, a recognized carcinogen. 

Second-hand vapor may also be harmful. In one study, people sitting in a chamber filled with secondhand smoke and others in a separate one with vaping aerosols (designed to mimic real-world conditions) had similar blood levels of nicotine after sitting in their respective confines. ("Nicotine is a highly addictive substance with negative effects on animal and human brain development, which is still ongoing in adolescence," the authors write.) Another study "measured indoor pollution from 3 people using e-cigarettes over a 2-hour period in a realistic environment modeled on a café," the authors wrote. "They found elevated nicotine, 1,2-propanediol, glycerin, aluminum, and 7 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons classified as probable carcinogens by the International Agency for Research on Cancer in the room air." 

Due to health and other concerns, the FDA proposed new rules to regulate e-cigarettes last month. 

For more coverage of the review, head over to the San Francisco Chronicle, which has a good story on the research. 








Robot Reads Novels, Writes Songs About Them

$
0
0

photo of a library aisle full of books
Books!
Greg Friedler/Getty Images

If a robot read a novel, how would it feel? You might get a sense from these little jingles. Below are some songs that were automatically created by a series of algorithms that turn the emotions in novels into short pieces of music. If the songs remind you, traumatically, of your untalented little sister practicing piano… well, you can't say I didn't warn you.

Actually, the origins of the songs are pretty cool, as the Physics arXiv Blog reports. They start with sentiment analysis, a field in computer science that got hot not long after Twitter did. As more and more people started tweeting, computer scientists and companies wanted to automatically process those tweets, to figure out what emotions people were expressing in them. For example, do people feel negatively or positively about… snack cakes? How do people feel about a specific brand, say, Little Debbie? You can see the commercial interest in this.

The same techniques computer scientists use to analyze Twitter are also able read the feels in any text. So now it's possible to automatically read the emotions in novels, too. To make the songs below, two researchers—one of them a programmer and a musician—went one step beyond that. After running novels through a sentiment-analysis algorithm, they created an algorithm that would express those sentiments through music.

Each song progresses through the emotions of the novel.

The algorithm splits novels up into four parts—beginning, early middle, late middle, and end—and writes melodies for each section. Thus, each song progresses through the emotions of the novel.

Among other things, the algorithm matches music to emotion by choosing different octaves, tempos, and keys. The sentiment analysis algorithm the researchers used was able to identify eight emotions in novels: trust, joy, sadness, fear, surprise, anger, and disgust. So the researchers wrote equations to tell their software how to choose the right qualities to go with these emotions. Joy and trust, for example, call for higher octaves. Anger, disgust, fear and sadness get lower octaves.

Knowing all that, it's a little easier to appreciate these ditties. The algorithms don't do too bad of a job at all. Lord of the Flies, for example, starts out appropriately ominously, although it gets a bit difficult to interpret in the middle:

Heart of Darkness is even heavier than Lord of the Flies, especially with those repeating fifths:

Anne of Green Gables is cutesy all the way through:

Check out the rest of the pieces on the researchers' website.

The algorithms' creators, Hannah Davis and Saif Mohammad, imagined several future applications for a piece of software like this. Here are some examples, taken from a paper Davis and Mohammad wrote about their work:

  • Creating audiovisual e-books that generate music when certain pages are opened—music that accentuates the mood conveyed by the text in those pages.
  • Finding songs that capture the emotions in different parts of a novel. This could be useful, for example, to allow an app to find and play songs that are compatible with the mood of the chapter being read.
  • Generating music for movie scripts. (!!)

[The Physics arXiv Blog]









Blog Post Questions Recent Big Bang Discovery

$
0
0

photo of the South Pole and BICEP Telescopes at night
The BICEP and South Pole Telescopes, 2008
Data from the BICEP (Background Imaging of Cosmic Extragalactic Polarization) Telescope contributed to the findings described below.
Keith Vanderlinde, National Science Foundation

A major recent cosmology finding is being called into question in some online exchanges, Science Now reports.

Last month, a team of astrophysicists announced it had found the first direct evidence that the universe expanded enormously less than a second after the Big Bang. The team found evidence of gravitational waves. The waves are ripples in the fabric of space and time that theories about the Big Bang had long predicted, but which physicists hadn't previously been able to measure.

If true, the new finding would give astrophysicists vital information about the formation of the universe. Scientists in the field celebrated with champagne and guesses about the discovery's Nobel Prize-worthiness. They wrote more than 300 papers dealing with the announcement's implications.

Scientists in the field wrote more than 300 papers dealing with the announcement's implications.

Like every scientific finding, however, gravitational waves awaited confirmation from independent researchers. Indeed, the discovery has not yet been published in a peer-reviewed journal, although it is free to download—and thus available for critique—on arXiv, a website for physics and other science papers. Now, a theoretical physicist and blogger in France has published a post on the blog Résonaances contending he's found some flaws in the gravitational waves measurements.

The gravitational wave team did not properly clean its data of interference from other galaxies, wrote Adam Falkowski of the Laboratory of Theoretical Physics of Orsay. The team disagrees. "We stand by our paper," Clement Pryke, one of the team's leaders and an astrophysicist at the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, told Science Now.

This isn't a question of cheating or fraud. Instead, it's one of whether Prkye's team, called Background Imaging of Cosmic Extragalactic Polarization or BICEP, analyzed its data correctly. This contrasts with some other recent online science critiques we've seen, which unearthed more harmful problems. It's expected that any big science discovery should trigger some debate about whether the results might be explained by something else.

More data and studies will help resolve the debate. Physicists are awaiting another release of data expected in October, from the European Space Agency spacecraft Planck, Science Now reports.

[Science Now








How To Make A Light, But Strong, Pickup Truck

$
0
0

Ford F-150
Courtesy Ford
When auto engineers want to improve fuel economy, they shave spare ounces wherever they can—engines, seats, even nuts and bolts. But that nickel-and-dime approach only goes so far. For burly vehicles like pickups, they need to go for the body. That’s the thinking behind Ford’s new F-150, which trades a steel body for an aluminum one.

Aluminum is typically seen as a weak metal (thanks, soda cans), but Ford engineers use a particular alloy that performs as well as steel. When heat-treated, it actually gains strength. The underlying frame is still made from high-strength steel, so the truck is tough enough to haul and tow heavy loads—even though it’s about 700 pounds lighter than its predecessor. The design should do plenty to boost fuel economy, though we’ll have to wait for road tests later this year to be sure by how much.

Other Car News You Should Care About

By Jia You

1) According to a recent Car Insurance Comparison study, which compiled state-by-state data on auto-related fatalities, DUIs, and traffic-law violations, Louisiana has the worst drivers. Vermont has the best.

2) The three-cylinder engine in Nissan’s new ZEOD RC race car is small enough to fit inside a piece of carry-on luggage, yet it produces 400 horsepower. That’s about four times the power of a three-cylinder production car.

3) A new Audi City “virtual showroom” in Berlin doesn’t have any cars on display. Instead, shoppers browse models on a 23-foot-wide 3-D screen. Audi will add the feature to other urban dealerships that can’t keep vehicles on hand.

4) Data from research firm AlixPartners indicate that car-sharing programs, such as Zipcar and RelayRides, will displace 1.2 million new vehicle sales by 2020. For each shared car, 32 new cars go unsold.

This article originally appeared in the May 2014 issue of Popular Science.








How To Boost Blood Supplies

$
0
0

Zu Sanchez Photography/Getty Images

PROBLEM

The shelf life of donated blood is short, just 42 days, and during emergencies even a large supply can quickly run out. To prolong blood’s useful life, hospitals can freeze it, but they rarely do so because technicians need to add glycerol, which prevents ice from ripping the red blood cells apart. The trouble is that glycerol is toxic and must be removed before the blood is used, a process that can take several days—time patients don’t typically have. In order to keep stocks high, hospitals must rely on a constant stream of donors that’s less than reliable. 

SOLUTION

Matthew Gibson, a chemistry professor at the University of Warwick in England, recently found that an ingredient used in eyedrops, polyvinyl alcohol, mimics a natural antifreeze protein in cold-acclimated fish. Polyvinyl alcohol can protect frozen blood cells in lower amounts than glycerol, so it takes only minutes to remove. That means frozen blood could be used almost immediately after defrosting, allowing hospitals to stockpile larger amounts. And that’s better for everyone. 

This article originally appeared in the May 2014 issue of Popular Science.








U.S. To Require Gender Equality For Medical Lab Rats

$
0
0

photo of Minnie and Mickey Mouse characters
Female and Male Mouse

The U.S. National Institutes of Health—one of the biggest funders of biomedical research in the U.S. and the world—will now require the studies it funds to have equal numbers of male and female lab animals. It's even requiring gender balance in studies done in cells in petri dishes. Yep, that means female and male lab rats will now have equal opportunity to die for science.

All kidding aside, this is actually an important moment for the way medicines are developed in America. All new drugs and treatments are first tested in cells in a petri dish, as well as lab mice, rats, monkeys and other animals. If those studies go well, then they're tested in people. Late-stage human studies of medicines in the U.S. are now required to recruit at least some women. (This wasn't always true and, on the whole, it's still not 50-50.) Gender parity in clinical trials is important because men and women are known to react differently to some medications. Just check out this example, or this one, or all these ones.

Before today, however, nobody required anybody to ensure that studies done in cells and animals included equal numbers of males and females. As a result, biology studies used many more male animals than female ones.

Gender bias in cell and animal research may be one reason why women experience more side effects from drugs than men.

The underrepresentation of female cells and animals in studies likely biases what drugs make it through the U.S.' rigorous clinical-trial system. The drugs that make it through to human tests are often the ones that were successful in male research animals. Perhaps a slightly different mix of drugs would go through if all relevant medicines were tested in both male and female animals. Gender bias in cell and animal research may be one reason why women experience more side effects from drugs than men, National Institutes of Health higher-ups Janine Clayton and Francis Collins wrote in an announcement published today in the journal Nature. (Clayton directs the U.S. Office of Research on Women's Health and Collins is the overall director of the NIH.)

So why do many researchers prefer male animals? Some believe female mammals are more troublesome. They have estrus cycles—that's the cycle that ends with a menstrual period, if the animal doesn't get pregnant—which can seem like just one more messy variable to have to deal with in data analysis. However, this review of studies found that female mice don't react differently to medicines in different times of their cycle. Even if female mice are troublesome to use, though, it seems like it should be worth it, to make medicines that are effective for all.

The National Institutes of Health plans to roll out its new requirement starting this October. Check out the Nature announcement for more details, and see Popular Science's own Q&A about "feminist biology" to learn about other ways gender bias affects science.








Say Hello To The Little Space Race That Could

$
0
0

(In numerical order) Courtesy: SkyCube, Hojun Song, Kicksat

A CubeSat crams the advanced hardware of enormous satellites into a box slightly larger than a Rubik’s Cube. The satellites’ small size and light weight have made it cheaper than ever to launch spacecraft into orbit. Here are three citizen-led CubeSats paving an ever-more-accessible path off planet Earth.

1) SkyCube

In 2011, after watching NASA’s final space shuttle launch, astronomy-app developer Tim DeBenedictis decided to crowdfund SkyCube with the help of his company, Southern Stars. The 2.9-pound CubeSat launched to the International Space Station on January 9, 2014, and astronauts deployed it February 28. Backers can use an app called Satellite Safari to take photos and tweet from orbit. After its 90-day mission, SkyCube will inflate a polyethylene balloon, drag itself into the atmosphere, and burn up.

Time: About 1 year

Cost: $250,000

2) OSSI-1

South Korean artist Hojun Song used off-the-shelf parts to build his spacecraft, OSSI-1. Like other newcomers to CubeSats, however, he had to navigate a maze of bureaucracy designed for national space programs (rather than private individuals) to launch it. On April 19, 2013, after years of work, his craft finally flew aboard a Russian Soyuz 2-1b rocket. OSSI-1 successfully entered orbit, but due to financial constraints, Song has yet to team up with a company that can establish contact with the spacecraft.

Time: 5 years

Cost: $200,000

3) KickSat

Why launch one satellite when you can send up dozens? That’s the idea behind KickSat, a spacecraft designed to release 104 postage stamp–size satellites into low-Earth orbit on March 30 (at press time). Each tiny satellite, called a Sprite, has a microcontroller, solar cells, and a radio that allows it to transmit a small amount of data. Michael Johnson, a former KickSat team member, has since made an even thinner and lighter version of Sprites, called Scouts, that he hopes to launch to the moon in 2015.

Time: 7 years

Cost: About $75,000

This article originally appeared in the May 2014 issue of Popular Science.

Correction (5/11/2014, 6:20pm ET): The original story misstated the number of Sprites aboard KickSat; there are 104, not 120. The cost of the project was also misstated as $375,000; the team paid roughly $75,000 for materials and did not have to pay for labor or launch costs. We regret the errors.








Viewing all 20161 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images