Quantcast
Channel: Popular Science | RSS
Viewing all 20161 articles
Browse latest View live

Robotic Gas Pumps Are Coming Soon

$
0
0

Pumping gas is a real pain. It involves actually getting out of your car, moving the muscles in your legs and arms and surrounding yourself with outside air. But one company plans to introduce robotic gas pumps in St. Louis, which would do all the work for drivers. Husky Corporation, based in Pacific, Mo., has developed such a pump that should be ready for regulatory testing in about nine months, reports local Fox affiliate KTVI.

"We already have drive-thru McDonalds, drive-thru banks and drive-thru car washes," Husky executive Brad Baker told KTVI. Why not robotic gas pumps?

This is how the machine works, as KTVI explains:

Infrared lights and cameras locate the fuel door. An arm with a suction cup opens the fuel door. A nozzle then extends into the fuel tank and releases the desired amount of fuel. Once the tank is full, the nozzle returns to the pump.

Baker said that he envisions the system with a touch-screen display, allowing drivers to select what kind of gas they want. A phone-based app could then be used for payment (not sure why one coudn't pay with a credit card, as with an ATM). The pumps were developed in cooperation with Swedish company Fuelmatics Systems and are expected to cost about $50,000 each. For what it's worth, there are already functioning robotic pumps in the Netherlands


    







Mosquito-Borne Chikungunya Virus Arrives In Americas

$
0
0

Infectious bite
The Aedes aegypti mosquito is now spreading the chikungunya virus in the Caribbean.
CDC

A potentially debilitating African virus has now officially made its way to the Americas, and is being spread between people by mosquitoes in the Caribbean. From early December to mid-January, the chikungunya virus had infected at least 200 people, epidemiologists say. But in the last week alone, another 498 confirmed cases have been reported, for a total of around 700. Not exactly happy Friday news. 

The virus is not usually fatal, though, with 1 death in every 1,000 cases, and then usually only in the elderly or immune-compromised. But you still don't want to get it, as it's known for debilitating symptoms, especially joint pain, that can last for weeks, and, rarely, for months to years, according to the World Health Organization. It often causes fever and other symptoms including headache, muscle pain, nausea, fatigue and rash. And there is no vaccine or medicine to treat it. 

You can take steps to avoid it, though: the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends wearing insect repellant to avoid being bitten if you travel to one of the islands where it has been reported so far, including Saint Martin, Martinique, Guadeloupe, Saint Barthelemy, and the British Virgin Islands. But it has already spread since being detected on Saint Martin last month, and officials worry it could make its way throughout the Caribbean, and to the United States.

It is known for explosive outbreaks and has reached "epidemic proportions," causing "considerable morbidity and suffering," according to WHO. It is now found in more than 40 countries, after originating in Tanzania in the early 1950s. The name means derives from a word in the Kimakonde language which means "to become contorted" and describes the stooped appearance of sufferers with joint pain, WHO noted. Nearly 2 million cases have been reported in South Asia since 2005.

It's only the latest arbovirus (or arthropod-spread pathogen) to arrive in the Americas, and illustrates that we are all vulnerable to the spread of these diseases, thanks in part to globalization. Other famous examples include the West Nile virus and dengue fever. Both dengue and the chikungunya virus are spread by the Aedes aegypti mosquito, and symptoms of both viruses appear similar, making detection of chikungunya more difficult.

The virus has been blamed for one "indirect" death in St. Martin. 


    






The Week In Drones: U.S. Aircraft Crashes In Yemen, Flying Firefighters In Dubai, And More

$
0
0

MQ-1 Predator Drone, Weaponized and Awaiting Command Over Afghanistan
USAF

Here's a round-up of the week's top drone news, designed to capture the military, commercial, non-profit, and recreational applications of unmanned aircraft. 

Military Crashes

An American drone crashed in Yemen. Reportedly the size of a Toyota Corolla, it's likely it was an MQ-1 Predator, and probably involved in the long-and-ongoing targeted killing campaign waged by the United States against Al Qaeda and affiliate groups.

A drone belonging to United Nations peacekeepers in the Democratic Republic of Congo slipped off the runway during a takeoff attempt last week, putting it out of commission for a little while. The drones are the first used by the U.N., and they've helped the peacekeeping force watch for armed groups crossing the border between the DRC, Rwanda, and Uganda. The Falco is an unarmed scout and surveillance tool, capable of flying for up to 14 hours straight.

Falco Drone
Georges Seguin, via Wikimedia Commons

Drone Photographers

Jeff Zita, a student at Hope College in Holland, Mich., used his DJI Phantom Drone to film ice sheets on Lake Michigan. Watch his footage below:

 

Meanwhile, people like Greg Utton of Mesa, Ariz., are using drones to take aerial photography and charging for the service. Drone photography is a legal gray area under current law, but the commercial benefits are real enough that Utton is willing to chance it.

Flying Firefighters

In the United Arab Emirates, the Dubai Civil Defense recently purchased 15 quadcopters to help firefighters by scouting buildings before they go inside, according to state-owned newspaper The National. No word yet on whether the drones can fly to the top of the Burj Khalifa.

Rabbit Chasers

In Idaho, a collaborative project between four universities is using drones to study the relationship between pygmy rabbits and their environment. Students with the University of Florida’s Unmanned Aircraft System Wildlife Project built the drone, and together with University of Idaho, Boise State University and Washington State University, they are working on a four-year project. In addition to tracking pygmy rabbit habitats, the team will evaluate how drones can best be used to monitor wildlife.

Pygmy Rabbit
United States Bureau of Land Management

    






Finding What Puts The Heat In Hot Peppers

$
0
0

Hot peppers
Warren Rachele (Wrachele) via Flickr, licensed under Creative Commons

To engineer a better pepper, you'd have to go out into the field—actual fields, around the world—and look at different traits, measurements, and yield. Then, after extracting DNA from various leaves and seeds, you could painstakingly evaluate for the different traits. 

On Sunday, a large (seriously, look at that list of authors) international team of scientists published the genome of the hot pepper for the first time. The information that lies within the genome could mean a more efficient plant breeding process, but it also helps reveal a few interesting secrets hiding within the pepper's genes. Because peppers are not so different from their cousins, the potato and tomato, the genome could also elucidate more about the evolution and adaptation of other delicious species.

One of the study's co-authors, Allen Van Deynze, has been working with peppers for about 20 years. He's also a director of research at the University of California Davis Seed Biotechnology Center

Van Deynze studies hot peppers, in part, because he enjoys eating them. This new genetic data reveals in more detail the titular spicy taste of the hot pepper. That the heat comes from an accumulation of capsaicinoids (which include capsaicin, dihydrocapsaicin, and nordihydrocapsaicin) was already known. But the process behind what gives peppers that trait was previously unclear. As the study says, the lack of clarity was odd, "considering the economic and cultural importance."

The hot pepper is a popular commodity—according to the study, world production in the last decade has increased by 40%. It adds the spice to many food dishes, but it also puts the pain in defense repellants, has anti-fungal properties, and serves as nice ornamental foliage. 

"We have known for quite a long time about capsaicins. We know why we can taste them and why birds can't taste them, and we even know the gene that could turn it on and off," Van Deynze tells Popular Science. "We just didn't know how it was regulated." 

That gene is called capsaicin synthase. With the genome, the team of researchers learned more about capsaicin synthase, which joins two pathways—one based on fatty acids, and another one that determines color, flavor, and other traits.  

Capsaicin synthase (CS) is only found in the fruit, not the seeds. So, if you—like the author, here—thought that peppers held the spice in their seeds, you would be wrong. The real hottest part of a pepper is in the white tissue that holds the seeds (known as the placenta). CS biosynthesizes the capsaisin, and the Capsicum genus is the only one that evolved to biosynthesize capsaicinoids. The study suggests that the pungency from peppers was evolved through new genes by unequal duplication of existing genes. 

The study was funded by research organizations, but also quite a few agribusiness companies that hold interest in plant breeding, such as Monsanto, Syngenta, Hortigenetics, among others. 


    






Stephen Hawking Says There Are No Black Holes

$
0
0

Physicist Stephen Hawking on a Zero-Gravity Flight, 2007
Jim Campbell - Aero-News Network for Zero Gravity Corporation®

Stephen Hawking has a big announcement. No, it's not that aliens exist or that humans won't survive another 1,000 years on Earth. The physicist claims, in a paper posted online Wednesday, that the idea of an event horizon—the point of no return at a black hole—conflicts with quantum theory. With no event horizons, there are no black holes, according to Hawking. 

“There is no escape from a black hole in classical theory,” Hawking told Nature News. Quantum theory, however, “enables energy and information to escape from a black hole.” Instead of an event horizon, Hawking's new paper proposes a so-called apparent horizon, which would suck in matter and eventually spit it out in a much different form. Hawking says trying to predict what this matter will be like would be like trying to predict the weather: possible, but very difficult to do. 

For more details, including some skepticism from other physicists, read the story at Nature News


    






Dubious Cold Fusion Machine Acquired By North Carolina Company

$
0
0

Unplugged
Rossi in his Bologna warehouse with a 10-kilowatt E-Cat module. He has been criticized in the past for not unplugging his machine during demos.
Steve Featherstone

Well, this is an interesting acquisition: A U.S. company called Industrial Heat has bought the rights to the notorious (and dubious) cold fusion technology called the Energy Catalyzer, or E-Cat. The device was created by Italian inventor Andrea Rossi, a convicted scam artist who has claimed for years that it can produce energy in the form of heat, far more than it consumes. If it really functions, it could cheaply power the world without producing pollutants. In May 2013, Rossi announced that an independent group had verified that his machine worked. As Popular Science pointed out at the time, however, the results of the tests were not peer-reviewed; the paper also "left out crucial details, for example referring to 'unknown additives' instead of specifying what chemicals actually go into the reaction." The same paper was linked to in the announcement from the company today (Jan. 24). 

There are many reasons to be skeptical of the technology, considering that it has never been conclusively proven to work, and claims to work via an unfamiliar chemical reaction. Rossi has also previously passed off spurious inventions, and has repeatedly backed-out of third party testing of the E-Cat, for example with NASA. 

Regardless, Industrial Heat, based in Raleigh, N.C., hopes to "make the technology widely available," it said in the announcement. "The world needs a new, clean and efficient energy source," said company spokesman JT Vaughn, who didn't immediately reply to a call seeking comment. "Such a technology would raise the standard of living in developing countries and reduce the environmental impact of producing energy."

For more information, here's the Popular Science feature on the E-Cat, from October 2012. 


    






Death Row Inmates' Last Meals Signal Attitudes Towards Sentences

$
0
0

Lobster Meal
Wikimedia Commons, Hartmut Inerle

A recent study from Cornell University gives insight into what those on death row request for their last meal before execution. Over five years, researchers examined what these individuals asked for, along with their last words, building off of a previous study that states "food is a particularly useful lens through which to investigate power relations in prison."

Individuals who denied being guilty were 2.7 times as likely to reject a last meal than those who admitted being guilty. Inmates who admitted guilt requested meals with 34 percent more calories. Those that maintained they were innocent also tended to request fewer brand-name foods. According to the study authors, this could be due to brand-name items being recognized as comfort food – and with inmates soon to be executed and accepting their guilt they're more "comfortable," wanting to indulge in their final meal.

The researchers also noted Texas's 2011 decision to stop the tradition of last meals on the grounds that they were unnecessary and inmates don't deserve such a privilege. This came after Lawrence Russell Brewer ridiculed the final offering by asking for a large amount of food and not eating a single bite. But according to the researchers, getting rid of the last meal for inmates would mean wiping out what could be an important way to understand people facing execution. 


    






Big Pic: A Fruit Fly Born In Outer Space

$
0
0

photo of a fruit fly covered with a white fungus
Space Fly
This fruit fly is covered with a fungal infection after a childhood in space compromised its immune system.
Deborah Kimbrell/UC Davis

This is a fruit fly, raised in space. Space was not directly what made it furred all over with white, but indirectly it was. The white stuff is fungus, and the fly grew it because after hatching and growing to adulthood in space, it didn't fight off a fungal infection the way a healthy fly that had grown up on Earth would.

The image comes from the research of a team of biologists from several U.S. institutions. Observations of astronauts and studies done in human immune cells have shown that space weakens the immune system. This U.S. team wanted to learn more about what was happening at a cellular level. Their little spacefaring flies taught them that low gravity shuts off an important component of the fly immune system—one that has a human counterpart.  

Their findings gave them some starting ideas about why people also have compromised immunity after spending time in space, they wrote in a paper they published today in the journal PLOS ONE. One experiment they performed in hypergravity—created for the flies using a centrifuge in a lab on Earth—also suggested exposure to gravity could prevent the immune effects of space.

Both the space flies and the Earth flies were born with the same genes, but exactly which of those genes turned on and went to work differed between them.

The team sent fruit fly eggs to space aboard the space shuttle Discovery. (Fun fact: These were the first flies to go into space in the name of immunology.) The eggs spent 12 days in space, during which time they hatched, crawled around a bit as larva, and became adult flies. Then they came back down to Earth, where biologists infected them with one of two things, either E. coli bacteria or a fungus called Beauveria bassiana. (I survived space and all I got was a fungal infection.)

The space flies' immune system fought off the E. coli, but not the Beauveria bassiana fungus. Meanwhile, similar control flies raised on Earth fought off both infections.

To figure out why the space flies had trouble with the fungus, the scientists analyzed all of the flies' genes. Both the space flies and the Earth flies were born with the same genes, but exactly which of those genes turned on and went to work differed between them. In Earth flies, the genes associated with their immune systems kicked into high gear after they got infected with the fungus. Among other genes, Earth flies activated something called the Toll signaling pathway, which scientists have long known flies use to fight off fungi. Humans have Toll-like genes, too, and they also work in immunity.

The space flies reacted differently from their stay-at-home siblings. They turned on some immunity genes after encountering Beauveria bassiana, so it's not like they were totally helpless. But they didn't use all of the genes the Earth flies used, and they didn't turn up their Toll pathway genes. In their paper, the biologists called their spacefaring flies "severely immunocompromised."

Strangely, when the biologists raised flies in a centrifuge to simulate higher-than-Earth gravity, they were more likely to survive a fungal infection than normal Earth flies.

The science team offered some hypotheses about what could be happening that would alter what genes flies activate, depending on the gravity they're exposed to. The hypotheses are testable, the team noted, although the team didn't do that for this paper. The next step should be to send fruit flies to the International Space Station, the biologists wrote, where the little bugs can spend longer in space.


    







Engineering The Ideal Olympian: Superfast Fitted Ski Suit

$
0
0

Suiting Up
Researchers used fabric textured like shark-skin to better manipulate airflow and minimize drag.
Travis Rathbone

Ski suits need to keep athletes warm, but they need to do so without slowing them down. “A few hundredths of a second can be a big deal in ski racing, so every advantage you can get is very meaningful,” says Olympian Ted Ligety. Historically, European teams have had the fastest suits, so the U.S. Ski and Snowboard Association sought to level the playing field this February. Researchers in its high-performance laboratory analyzed various fabrics with an electron microscope, selecting one that’s textured like sharkskin to better manipulate airflow and minimize drag. 

The new suits are also designed specifically for the course at Sochi. Researchers methodically analyzed speed and GPS data from training runs there and used the information to guide the placement of zippers and seams to minimize drag. They then performed more than 100 wind-tunnel tests, which verified that the new suit reduces drag 17 percent more than the previous one did. Because Sochi sits near sea level, Ligety thinks the suits will be especially valuable. “The air is heavier, thicker, and more humid,” he says, “so drag will be more of an issue.”

King of the Mountain
Ted Ligety wore a prototype of the new Olympic ski suit at last year’s World Championships. Designed to fit a skier’s body in the crouched racing position, the suit reduces drag by preventing excess fabric from vibrating as speeds exceed 60 mph.
Christophe Pallot/Getty Images

Click here for the rest of our 2014 Olympics coverage.

This article originally appeared in the February 2014 issue of Popular Science.


    






This Alien Orb Comes Alive When People Are Around

$
0
0

 

 

If you see an ominous orb of white light that unfolds metallic petals as you approach, it is probably either a) an extraterrestrial space pod, or b) art. This one is the latter. (Probably! Don't look at me.)

Brought to you from space by the designers at Studio Roosegarde, of smart highway fame, the Lotus Dome has been around since 2012, but it's now stationed at the Netherlands' Rijksmuseum. The exterior is made of Mylar that unfolds in response to light; when earthlings approach, an interior light turns on. The designer Daan Roosegarde calls the process "techno-poetry," which sounds exactly like something an alien would say. Hmmmm.


    






Meet The People Who Want To Print A Home In A Day

$
0
0

Home In A Day
wikihouse.cc

On a cold, gray day in central London, Alastair Parvin is staring at a coffeepot, or what used to be one before he took it apart to clean it. The appliance lies strewn across an office table, a wreck of wet steel and springs. Parvin co-founded WikiHouse, an open-source construction system that could transform how people design and construct buildings. But rebuilding a percolator seems to have him stumped. 

After a few failed attempts, Parvin reconstructsthe machine, produces coffee, and shows me around the maker space he shares on one floor of a mid-20th-century skyscraper. It’s a sprawling landscape of desks, sofas, and bulletin boards with a plywood house frame rising from within the common area. It’s also an apt manifestation of WikiHouse itself: occupants taking back architecture on their own terms. 

The 30-year-old Parvin, a member of the design collective 00 (pronounced zero zero), started WikiHouse with fellow architect Nick Ierodiaconou in 2011. In effect, the two set out to subvert their profession just as they were entering the workforce. Architecture, Parvin argued at an attention-grabbing TED talk in 2013, has become a rarefied service for only the very rich. WikiHouse aims to put home design and construction in the hands of all people, regardless of training or economic status. It has established a free library of building plans that anyone can download, adapt, print, and construct.

Alastair Parvin
wikihouse.cc

“WikiHouse is an open production system,” Parvin says. “Using a 3-D–modeling program like Google SketchUp, you can build your plans from scratch, import some from the WikiHouse site, or mix the two approaches. Then, send the plans to a CNC machine, which cuts the pieces from plywood. It’s like printing an Ikea flat-pack house.” 

As with ready-to-assemble furniture, the plans clearly match the cut pieces, so construction is straightforward. Moreover, many of the pieces fit together with wedges and pegs that are also cut from plywood, simplifying the tools and reducing, if not eliminating, the number of metal fasteners required. Cover the finished frame with cladding, pack it with insulation, and you have a structure you can live in. 

So far, there are a handful of prototype WikiHouses and one completed construction—a walkers’ shelter in Fridaythorpe, England, a moorland village of 300 people previously noted for hosting the World Championship Flat Cap Throwing Competition. “There’s no inhabited WikiHouse yet,” Parvin says. “But we’ve got several on the board.”

Meanwhile, the number of WikiHouse users is growing. What began as a small project has developed into a global community of individuals and teams who experiment with designs, share their experiences, and collectively troubleshoot. 

But even if thousands of forward-thinking landowners choose to erect their houses themselves, WikiHouse doesn’t yet replace an essential role of architects and contractors: navigating the maze of laws, approvals, and materials needed to keep an abode safe, legal, warm, and plumbed-in. Parvin acknowledges that limitation, and to address it, he says he plans to expand the site to provide designs suited to a user’s location and needs.

“Our dream is to make WikiHouse simple to use, with parametric software that lets you say how big you want things, what material you’re using, and then generates everything,” Parvin says. “It will know about all sorts of things, like the way plywood behaves in different humidities, your climate, your electricity, even your zoning laws.”

Parvin grew up as Wikipedia began to mortally gore the Encyclopaedia Britannica—he was 17 when the crowdsourced reference site launched—and he wants the Internet to likewise force the evolution of his field. An open system makes it possible to scale and test ideas quickly, so WikiHouse could become a launching pad for new building technology. It could also destabilize the established role of architects and construction firms: Why pay them to design and build something that’s already been perfected and put together thousands of times? Parvin has not only spotted the technological shift that makes his training as an architect redundant; he’s actively trying to bring that shift about. 

At the end of the interview, we pick up our respective digital tablets. Parvin takes the opportunity to talk about the Claude glass, a tablet-size 18th-century black mirror used by landscape painters to view a scene with heightened contrast and color. It’s credited with reviving the popular art of the landscape. “Technology isn’t about higher, faster, bigger,” he says, staring into the black mirror of his iPad mini. “It’s about reducing thresholds, enabling ordinary people. That’s when it changes cultures.” 

The Prototype
At WikiHouse’s London office space, visitors inspect the frame of a prototype shelter. The joints have wedge and peg connections inspired by classical Korean architecture.
wikihouse.cc

HOW TO PRINT A HOUSE, IN FIVE EASY STEPS

1) Install Google SketchUp, a free3-D–modeling program, and download the plug-in for WikiHouse

2) Choose a home design from the WikiHouse library, and click “make this house” in SketchUp to generate cutting files for its components.

3) Use a CNC mill (or hire a machine shop) to cut the beams, panels, and other pieces from a sheet material such as plywood.

4) Match the pieces to form a frame, and connect them with pegs. Raise the frame, and screw on the walls, roof, and floor panels.

5) Plumb and wire the structure, and add insulation, windows, and cladding to weatherproof it. Now your new WikiHouse is ready for occupants.  

 

Rupert Goodwins writes about technology in the U.K.

This article originally appeared in the January 2014 issue of Popular Science.


    






Where And How To Sift For Your Own Fossils

$
0
0

Fossil Finder
Kevin Hand

You don’t need to be a paleontologist or travel through remote canyons to find exquisite fossils. The teeth, shells, and bones of ancient animals could lurk in a creek, quarry, or on a beach near you. Once you find a good location—the map below shows a bunch of spots—you’ll need to separate fossils from surrounding soil. A mesh-lined letter tray works in a pinch, but the best option is to build your own sifter. We like this rig made from ¼-inch hardware cloth and 1-inch-by-2-inch planks. Wood floats, so your sieve won’t sink, and the wire can catch shark or ray teeth, small bones, and even ammonite casts. It works best in water, where erosion has done most of the hard work; unwanted sand, dirt, and pebbles will wash out of the bottom without spreading dust.

Time: 1 hour

Cost: About $10

Difficulty: 1/5

 

 

Tools

1. Measuring tape

2. Felt-tip marker

3. Four bar clamps

4. Saw

5. Cordless drill

6. Metal snips

7. Staple gun

8. Hammer

Materials (per sifter)

1. Six of 1-inch-by-2-inch wood

2. Eight 1 1/4-inch-long-wood screws

3. 1 sq. foot of hardware cloth (galvanized, with 1/4-inch holes)

Instructions

A) Measure: Use the measuring tape and felt-tip marker to divide the plank of wood into two 16-inch pieces and two 7-inch ones.

B) Cut: Clamp down the wood, and saw across the markings. The four pieces will comprise the sifter’s frame. (Save the scrap for any additional sifters.)

C) Screw: Place the short pieces between the ends of the long ones, forming a rectangle, and clamp them down. Drive two screws through each corner.

D) Snip: Measure an 8-inch-by-16-inch rectangle of hardware cloth. Snip it out, being careful to avoid leaving any sharp prongs.

E) Attach: Staple the wire to one side of the frame. Five staples across each short piece and 10 across each longer piece will do. Hammer in any exposed prongs.

F) Sift: Load the sifter with a few scoops of fossil-rich earth. Shake to remove sand, mud, and pebbles. Examine the catch to see if you got lucky.

 

Warning: Protect yourself from sharp edges and flying debris with safety gloves and eyewear. When hunting fossils, don’t break the law! Always get permission and permits.

This article originally appeared in the January 2014 issue of Popular Science.


    






Google Buys AI Startup, Hires Ethics Board To Oversee It

$
0
0

Precog
20th Century Fox

In an apparent move to feed its smart-hardware ambitions, Google has bought an artificial intelligence startup, DeepMind, for somewhere in the ballpark of $500 million. Considering all of the data Google sifts through, and the fact that it might be getting into robotics, it's not completely absurd that they'd want some software to give a robotic helping hand. (Facebook apparently wanted the company, too, and they've already made moves to wrangle their own sprawling web of information.) But the other part of this story is a little stranger: the deal reportedly came under the condition that Google create an "ethics board" for the project.

What, exactly, does that mean? No idea. It's unclear how the board would be structured, who'd be on it, or when it would be consulted. The London-based DeepMind doesn't seem particularly sinister, either: the company has mostly used its software in fields like e-commerce and gaming. The point is software like this could eventually be used for work in ethical gray areas, and DeepMind might've wanted to get ahead of the issues. 

Which, good. The more decisions we cede to machines, the more we need human oversight of those decisions. A simple "Don't be evil" mantra might not cut it.


    






New Software Reads History From Skulls

$
0
0

scan of a 17th-century anatomical drawing showing the human skull
Skull Anatomy
Drawing by Govard Bidloo, published in 1690. Image made available online by the National Libraries of Medicine.

If you've ever seen a lot of skulls together—say, at the Mütter Museum in Philadelphia—you know they look as varied as fully-fleshed faces do. There are big ones and little ones, narrow ones and squat ones, and ones with differently shaped eye sockets, foreheads and mouth openings. I know that's not exactly shocking, but I still remember my surprise during my own visit to the Mütter. I was so accustomed to seeing roughly the same shape in Halloween costumes and prints.

In fact, skulls vary enough that forensic scientists are able to use them to identify remains that may not have any fabric or soft tissue associated with them anymore, The Week reports. The Week looked at a new piece of software in forensics, called 3D-ID, that takes 3-D scans of skulls, compares the scans to its own database of skulls, and makes detailed IDs:

What comes back is eerily specific. For instance, [the] software might reveal not only that a skull belonged to a Latino male, but that the man's ancestors came from South America, as opposed to a Latino man descended from Mesoamerica or the Caribbean.

Of course, forensic anthropologists have long been able to figure out a person's gender and race from different measurements on skulls. 3D-ID is a tool to help those scientists measure and compare 3-D shapes more quickly and easily.

[The Week


    






Watch A Drone Launch A Rocket

$
0
0

This is a quadcopter that launches rockets. According to Scottsdale, Ariz.-based ukarmy04, the Flitetest forum member behind the project, it's more of a proof of concept than anything else. The body is mostly wood, with electrical parts from kits, and has a few novel features. The first is a metal disk at the center to absorb the rocket's blast. The second is a pair of central copper strips that connect the motors to the battery. The motors and batter are mounted on the bottom of the drone, as far from the rocket's blast as possible. 

There's limited usefulness for something like this—the height gained by launching from a drone is almost certainly offset by the limited carrying capacity of the flying platform. As far as "flying thing that launches flying things" goes, well, this is way less ridiculous than the Helicarrier from "The Avengers".


    







Top-Level Domains Like ".sexy" Are Landing Next Week

$
0
0

Graffiti "Internet" on the wall in Vodice, Croatia.
Ronald Eikelenboom
It's been in the works for years, but the largest-ever expansion of the domain name system is now upon us. By Feb. 4, you'll be able to buy and start a website with dozens of new endings--like .coffee, .computer, .buzz, or .email--instead of more familiar options like .com or .net. And it's only the beginning: In the next year, about 1,000 generic top-level domain names (or gTLDs for short; like the "com" in PopSci.com) will become available.

Some of them will be cheap; other are much more expensive. Here are how much some of the new URL suffixes will cost, from Quartz:

The .guru TLD is open for pre-registrations (before it officially opens to the general public) on GoDaddy for $39.99 per year. A domain on .ventures is $69.99. One on .luxury starts at $799.99 per year. One of the applicants for .sucks has declared it will ask for $25,000 during the "sunrise period," a 30-day span during which trademark holders can register their domains to avoid domain-squatting.

(I think that last one .sucks, but maybe only because I didn't think of it first.)

There is some debate about whether or not the expansion makes sense--some say it is necessary because there aren't enough .com names left, while others think it is a bad idea, and argue that it will result in unnecessary costs for business owners looking to avoid domain squatting

[Via Quartz]


    






Foundation Plans To Open A "Fat Farm" For Elephants In California

$
0
0

Who you callin' fat?
An African elephant at the San Diego Zoo.
Brett Baker / YouTube
African elephants are the world's largest land animals. But some of them are too large. A recent study, for example, found that about 75 percent of elephants in American zoos are overweight. 

Plans are in the works to open a "fat farm" for overweight African elephants, where they'd be fed fiber-rich plants and allowed room to move around and exercise as they would in their natural habitat, the Wall Street Journal reports. It won't be too big, though; the proposed "semi-wild" herd would comprise three to five animals at first, and hopefully grow to a group of 12 to 15 members over a 20-year span. The preserve would be located in Tehama County, in Northern California, and funded by a foundation set up by the businessman Roger McNamee

The plan highlights a trend in zoos to provide more room for large animals, and to replicate natural feeding habits. Caretakers at the Oakland Zoo, for example, spread around brush so that elephants must work to find choice foliage, as they would in the wild. The plan was put in place after a study found that zoo elephants are generally overweight. "One of the researchers on the team developed a body-conditioning scoring system based on five different views of the elephant that does include a posterior view, essentially looking for fat deposition around the area of the rump and the spine," researcher Cheryl Meehan told the WSJ.

Here's what a weigh-in at the Oakland Zoo looks like:

On a recent day, a bull elephant named Osh lumbered onto a giant scale that put him at 12,495 pounds. That is a fit and healthy six tons for a 10½-foot-tall, 19-year-old male elephant, said an approving Jeff Kinzley, the zoo's elephant manager.

Lisa, a 34-year-old female elephant, weighed in at just 9,285 pounds—but was showing serious pachyderm paunch. Lisa is big-boned, but Dr. Parrott, a veterinarian, also politely pointed out her "rotund belly and lack of muscle definition."

At press time, Lisa could not be reached for comment. 

[Wall Street Journal]


    






White Roofs Keep Cities Cooler Than 'Green' Ones, Study Finds

$
0
0

photo of the roofs of historical rowhouses, some painted black and others painted white
White and Black Roofs
National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior

What's the greenest roof? A white one. White-painted roofs are three times more efficient than "green roofs"—rooftops that are planted over with grass or other greenery—at countering global warming, a new analysis found. White and green are both are much better for the environment than traditional black-colored roofs, which heat up under the sun, drive up air conditioning bills, and make cities and towns a few degrees warmer than they would be otherwise. Cooler roofs can make a big difference: In a previous study, the same team determined that a 100-square-meter white roof offsets 10 tons of planet-warming carbon dioxide over its lifetime.

The work comes from a team at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California that's dedicated to studying how to keep cities cooler. Although team members knew both white and green roofs are better than traditional roofing, they wanted to get some hard numbers comparing the two. White roofs came out ahead in both improving global temperatures and cost, but both are good choices, the team wrote in a paper published in the journal Energy and Buildings.

White roofs reflect sunlight and heat so well, they help counter global warming, the team found. Green roofs don't reflect as well. However, both kinds of roofs keep their own buildings cool on hot days. Green roofs actually save owners more on their energy bills, because evaporation from the plants makes them better at cooling buildings in the summertime, while in the winter, they help hold in heat because they're more insulating.

"In Chicago's July 1995 heat wave, a major risk factor in mortality was living on the top floor of a building with a black roof."

Nevertheless, over 50 years, green roofs cost more than both black ones and white ones because the plants are expensive to install, the lab found.

Either way, the team advocates many cities phase out black roofs. Not only do dark rooftops impact the environment, they make heat waves in cities more dangerous, Arthur Rosenfeld, the lead scientist in the roofs analysis, said in a statement. Rosenfeld is a physicist and energy researcher at the Lawrence Berkeley National Lab.

"In Chicago's July 1995 heat wave, a major risk factor in mortality was living on the top floor of a building with a black roof," he said. "Government has a role to ban or phase out the use of black or dark roofs, at least in warm climates, because they pose a large negative health risk."


    






The Trials And Torments Of Space School

$
0
0

Sending people to space has always involved a frank assessment of their defects, and in the early days, it was a matter of finding people without any. First it was fighter pilots—calm in a crisis, physically perfect, unquestioning in their execution of mission control’s instructions. Then, as it became clear that space was more than a military objective, space agencies began to train scientists for flight, placing otherwise reasonable researchers into fighter jets and swimming pools and screening them relentlessly for defects of vision, circulation, or character.

Now a new category of space traveler is headed beyond the stratosphere. Not the combat pilots and astrophysicists who train for at least two years just to get a shot at a trip, but the rest of us, with our carry-on bags, our iPads, our motion sickness. Folks. Citizens. Regular people.

At press time, Virgin Galactic’s SpaceShipTwo had already survived its first Mach-1 test flight, and its backer, Richard Branson, plans to be on board when it launches to space in the second half of the year. Meanwhile, the XCOR Lynx prototype is slated for tests early this year; the company says it will make a suborbital flight with passengers shortly thereafter. And SpaceX recently initiated the development of its own passenger spacecraft.

Until this point, space, the final frontier, existed almost as an abstraction for most of us, a curiously appealing void just beyond our grasp. Now it is within reach. The democratization of space has arrived.

There are, of course, caveats. Tickets are not cheap. A seat with Virgin Galactic or XCOR costs $95,000 to $250,000, which limits access to the very rich or the very dedicated. And then there is the issue of the flight. According to a spokesperson, “Based on the company’s initial evaluations and training, Virgin Galactic expects that most people should be able to fly.” But traveling to space takes a remarkable amount of physical stamina. I found that out the hard way.

 

 

 

 

On a sweltering summer day in southeastern Pennsylvania, I turn into the entrance of the National AeroSpace Training and Research (Nastar) Center, the only privately run spaceflight-training facility in the country. It looks rather humdrum, a warehouse surrounded by strip malls and office buildings, but it’s one of the few places where aspiring astronauts can endure the twin trials of liftoff and reentry without leaving Earth. 

Nastar Center trains military, civilian, and private pilots and acts as a showroom for Environmental Tectonics Corporation (ETC), its parent company and one of the country’s largest manufacturer of simulators. When an allied air force wants to buy a flight simulator, ETC brings representatives here to whip them around. And in the private-space industry, the company found a new market for its services. 

Upon entering the building, I see a gallery of notable visitors lining one wall, Buzz Aldrin and Richard Branson among them. Down the hall is an ejection-seat simulator and hypobaric chamber. And then there’s the enormous centrifuge into which I’m going to try not to barf today. 

In the lobby, I shake hands with four giddy hopefuls clad in custom-made blue-and-red flight suits they brought with them. These are the first flight candidates from the United States Rocket Academy (USRA), a nonprofit that’s seeking to create a new category of astronaut-qualified average Joes, so-called citizen astronauts who can skip the rigorous two-year training that NASA astronauts must endure. These four, who hold tickets for the XCOR Lynx flight in 2014, will be among the first citizen astronauts to leave the planet. By being here at Nastar Center, they hope to help establish a training protocol for this new class of astronaut, defining the battery of tests that will someday go along with a ticket to ride.

The Phoenix Centrifuge
This machine, at Nastar Center, can model any phase of flight.
JJ Sulin

Gy It’s extremely rare to experience prolonged sideways G-force in an air- or spacecraft. Only a flat spin or a T-bone collision tends to produce it. Gy can move or even dislodge organs.

FORCES OF FLIGHT

Gx This is the classic lips-peeled-back G-force. It looks gruesome, but it’s the most tolerable: In the 1950s, U.S. Air Force Colonel John Stapp showed a human can survive more than 45 Gx.

Gz The vertical G-force arises when the craft performs loops. It induces tunnel vision and unconsciousness when too much G-force drains blood from the head.

 

 

“It’s a beta/alpha test of a citizen-astronaut training program,” says Ed Wright, who founded the USRA after a career at Microsoft and is leading his group today. “We plan to bring people up who want to be space operators, not just space tourists.” Wright, a man in his early 50s with a head so perfectly round, it seems built for a flight helmet, has been planning this test for months. He believes in the private space movement. And he thinks that it can be a platform for a new kind of citizen science. During their precious few minutes in space, the four members of the USRA plan to conduct a handful of experiments chosen from dozens of projects submitted online. It’s a lower strata of scientific research, one that might not qualify for a NASA berth but could benefit from even the shortest time in orbit. But to do this, they’ll first have to reach space in sound body and mind.

In a classroom off the lobby, we receive a couple of hours’ instruction. Swee Weng Fan, a former flight surgeon for the Singapore air force, softly talks us through the basics of Newtonian physics and human physiology, explaining that our bodies are mostly water, run through by a circulatory system that keeps it functioning. Then we segue to how Newton’s discoveries—rest and velocity, acceleration, equal and opposite force—can quickly conspire to disrupt that system in terrible ways. When G-forces pull the blood from a pilot’s head and pool it at the feet, for instance, they upset the flow of oxygen to the brain. The result is G-force–induced loss of consciousness, or G-LOC. The eyes roll back, the body spasms, the pilot passes out—there’s even a bit of dreaming, Swee tells us. The warning signs include tunnel vision and temporary blindness. It will be our job this afternoon to resist G-LOC with an “anti–G-strain maneuver.” By tensing the legs, butt, and other major muscles below the heart, and by taking quick, deep breaths, Swee says, it’s possible to push blood back up into the head and not pass out, even as the centrifuge whirls us in circles at a steady 6 Gs. 

By noon, I know this is all going to go very badly for me. I haven’t shared with the instructors or my classmates that I come from a long, queasy line. My grandfather heaved off the sides of the USS United States on his way to India. My father likes to tell the story of puking into an airsickness bag as I laid in his lap as an infant. I have been ill aboard boats, cars, and airplanes, and today, I am certain, I will add a centrifuge to my list.

We gather in an observation room overlooking the massive, whirling machine, whose arc is at least 50 feet in diameter. It moves impossibly fast, like a giant’s hammer in full swing; yet in this room not 30 feet away, we don’t feel any vibration. Monitors that broadcast views from within the centrifuge capsule line the walls. With the leather couches and the multiple screens, the place looks like a sports bar, albeit one in which every patron is wearing a flight suit.

There are two G-forces we’ll experience today. The first is along the z-axis, the one that goes up and down. It’s referred to as Gz. The Gz forces are what cause G-LOC, because they drive blood from the brain. The second force is Gx, which extends from the chest through the back. Gx causes the face to peel up and back and exerts a crushing sensation on the lungs. But while Gx is a nuisance to be tolerated (up to 10 Gx, whereupon it begins to inflict injury), Gz is what fighter pilots worry about and train to resist. We’ll endure four tests of roughly 10 seconds each—2.2 and 3.5 Gz, and 3 and 6 Gx. The lesser number is about half of what it takes to get to space. The greater number is the maximum a spacegoer will encounter during a suborbital launch. Swee will test us at half strength first—I’m guessing so we have a chance to back out.

I watch the first student strap in. Richard, the commercial pilot, looks to be in his late 50s and has wanted to be an astronaut for as long as he can remember. He is utterly unfazed by his tests. At the end of his heavier Gx run, he cheerfully pushes against the force with his arms, miming push-ups, and reenters the observation room to applause and high-fives.

I feel heartened by Richard’s performance. After all, I’m younger than he. But then Phil, the college science instructor, who looks closer to my age, takes his turn in the centrifuge. As the test ramps up, I hear him complaining of nausea over the monitors. I’m next, and I rise from my seat with worry in my stomach. As I approach the centrifuge, Phil wobbles down the steps and stands unsteadily for a moment. I can see that his hairline is ringed with perspiration. “I’m okay,” he says weakly, speaking past me into the air. I pat him on the shoulder and mount the steps.

 

Today, the nature and trajectory of a private spaceflight is well understood. Take, for example, Virgin Galactic: A carrier aircraft called WhiteKnightTwo will bring SpaceShipTwo, carrying six passengers, to 50,000 feet. Once SpaceShipTwo detaches, a hybrid rocket motor will ignite, and the craft will accelerate to supersonic speed in eight seconds, gradually pulling into a vertical climb and reaching a maximum velocity of Mach 3.5 during a roughly 70-second burn. At 328,000 feet, the border of space, SpaceShipTwo will float for several minutes before rotating its tail upward and falling back into Earth’s gravitational pull, treating passengers to beautiful views of Earth (and briefly subjecting them to roughly 6 Gs). At 70,000 feet, the tail returns to its normal position, and the craft glides to Earth for another 25 minutes. Total flight time: approximately two hours from boarding to disembarkation. 

I can see his hairline is ringed with sweat. “I’m okay,” he says weakly, speaking past me into the air.

But while Virgin and XCOR have spent billions developing a reliable means to get passengers to space, many equally complicated issues remain, the first of which is determining who should be allowed to fly. For this, NASA has very strict guidelines: vision correctable to 20/20, seated blood pressure below 140/90, a height of 5'2" to 6'3"—and that’s before the water-survival tests and scuba certification. According to Federal Aviation Administration regulations on spaceflight, private space companies cannot sell tickets to anyone younger than 18. But that’s the only guideline.  

For now, the question of whether to attempt the trip falls by and large to the passengers. The Nastar Center simulator can help that decision along—if you can’t make it through 10 minutes in a simulator, you may want to reconsider the second mortgage on your home. Virgin already recommends that prospective passengers take a spin in a centrifuge, and the new breed of space outfitters popping up to serve private space tourists are deciding if they should mandate this sort of training session for all customers.

The next issue companies will have to address is what to do with passengers once they reach 328,000 feet. Can they get up and float around? What happens if someone has a medical emergency? Or needs the bathroom? Nastar Center, as one of the few facilities in the world with the equipment to simulate a trip to space, offers a rare chance to probe these questions. “The companies that use us for training are asking us what we’re finding out,” says Brienna Henwood, the director of space training and research at Nastar Center. “They’re trying to sort out what to do.”

Beyond those very broad brushstrokes, the details of private spaceflight are still a long way from resolved. Consider that it took the airline industry years to establish protocols—seat backs, tray tables, etc.—that work for everyone. And that was in the Earth’s atmosphere. In a weightless environment, vomiting means the threat of bits of regurgitated food floating into your nasal passages. Sixty-two miles above Earth, what laminated safety-information card can help you with that? 

Centrifuge Control Room
JJ Sulin

Another Cadet
Photo by JJ Sulin

Within the centrifuge, I strap into a pilot seat in front of a blank, curved wall onto which a false horizon and gauges are projected. The rotation of the centrifuge is designed to fool the inner ear into believing the horizon is where the simulation shows it to be, but my inner ear is more skeptical than most, unwilling to accept what it cannot see for itself, and before the door closes, I know I’m dead. 

I spot an airsickness bag on one side of the seat, and I take it out to determine exactly where the business end is. Then I try to jab it back into its sleeve, fail, and let it fall to the floor. I’ve got more important things to worry about.

“Are you ready?” asks Swee over the cockpit speakers. He’s overseeing the simulation from a control room. “Yes,” I say, trying to sound jaunty. The centrifuge begins its “idle” rotation—a mere 1.4 Gs, intended to simulate flat, straight flight. The screen in front of me shows a level horizon, mountains passing beneath me. My inner ear knows something is not right. It can sense that I’m actually moving in a circle and keeps sending my eyes to the left in an effort to find what it knows is the real horizon, somewhere outside this capsule. I have to fight to keep focused on the false, flat one projected in front of me. “I’m a little dizzy,” I say faintly. “Okay, just rest until you’re ready,” Swee replies.

Eventually I realize I could spin all day. “It’s not going to get better,” I say. “Let’s go.”

The first maneuver is a hard right turn, perhaps 45 degrees. As I crank over, my inner ear begins to send multiple signals. You’re falling forward, it says. And to the right, it adds. Also, go ahead and scream, it suggests. My eyes don’t know where to look, and just as I begin to panic, the horizon rotates level again, adding a new clash of vestibular signals to the mix. One of four tests is over, and I already feel awful. 

“Now we’ll do the same thing, but at 3.5 Gz,” Swee says. “Remember to clench your muscles and to take those intermittent breaths,” he adds. “Three . . . two . . . one . . .”

And now it’s worse. The turn is much steeper, and everything is wrong. Again my eyes don’t know where to look, but it doesn’t matter, because they’re starting to lose their ability to see. Red, veiny patterns intrude around the edges of my sight. I try to clench my muscles to force blood above my heart, and I’m huffing like a child throwing a tantrum, but the center of my vision is shrinking. Wow, it really is like a tunnel, I think. In a moment, I’m not going to be able to see at all.  

Then the capsule cranks sideways to level out, and there’s another set of conflicting, sickening signals. Gz is over. 

Spacial-Disorientation Trainer
JJ Sulin

I’m nauseated and dizzy, but at this point my brain is so occupied by thoughts of panic and death that it has chosen to accept this false horizon projected in front of me as the actual one, and I focus with relief on its stillness.

“Ready for Gx?” asks Swee. “Oh, God,” I say. He lets me breathe for a bit, and then it’s time. 

Three . . . two . . . one . . . boom, I’m simultaneously moving down and up, somehow—and then I’m very clearly rushing straight up. The feeling is accompanied by an amazing crushing sensation, one that sends the skin around my mouth up toward my eyes and holds it there. Ten seconds pass, and the leveling out feels like falling face-first off a house.

Jacob Ward
Photo by JJ Sulin

And now the last test of the morning: a full 6 Gx. This time, if you were to give me a choice between, say, enduring this test and shooting myself in the head, I’d choose the latter—if only I could lift my arm. I can feel my Adam’s apple falling back across my airway and touching the other side. I’m having trouble breathing. I’m literally being crushed, and I want it to stop. Even as I level out, my inner ear is in full-on rebellion, and my eyes are all over the capsule. I can almost smell the sour tang of the pastrami I had for lunch. And then the door opens, and I’m helped out gently.

I didn’t throw up. That much I can say. But I have to unzip my flight suit to the waist and collapse onto the sofa in my damp T-shirt to hold it together. Somebody fetches me a Coke. And I, who came to this program to quietly participate and observe, find myself the center of attention. I receive a half hour of sympathetic pats on the back from a roomful of people who not only have more time and money and courage than I do but who also have a miraculous resistance to what I can only describe as intense motion sickness. 

From my position on the couch, I watch the rest of the prospects take their turns. One woman, Maureen, who is a member of USRA, practically runs into the centrifuge, she’s so excited. She weathers the test unperturbed, except for one thing: “Hey, an airsickness bag hit me in the face as I was going around!” she says, exiting the centrifuge. I raise my pale and sweating hand in halfhearted apology and close my eyes.

 

If the Gz and Gx tests were the warm-up, the day’s main event is a full simulation of the trip aboard SpaceShipTwo. Swee says he’ll give me a trial run under only half the expected G-forces and then a final test at full Gs.

Simulator Chair
JJ Sulin

He offers some advice as I strap in. “Don’t turn your head,” he says. I press backward against the headrest and try to remain still. This makes an enormous difference, in that the movement of the centrifuge and my head don’t produce mismatched signals in my inner ear. 

The capsule tips and bobs as it frees itself from the simulated carrier craft. I feel as if I’m tipping back in my chair. I’m not nauseous, but I’m terrified: The simulated view shows me just how far and fast the Earth is falling away, which only deepens the panic I’m working hard to control.

At the apogee, where weightlessness takes hold, everything goes silent, and I’m treated to a slowly rotating view of the curve of the planet. “What’s that I’m looking at?” I ask. “That’s Los Angeles,” says Swee. And I realize, as the “ship” turns, that I can see the San Francisco Bay Area at the top of my view. As a robotic voice counts down to the reentry sequence, I imagine my wife in Oakland, chasing my daughter around our backyard. Astronauts on spacewalks have often reported a sense of euphoric kinship with the stars, the universe, everything, leading to a dangerous reluctance to reenter the spacecraft. I have the opposite urge: a sensation of being impossibly far from home and an overwhelming desire to be instantaneously transported to it. 

The centrifuge begins to simulate a roaring, shuddering reentry sequence, less severe than the launch but just as terrifying, and finally we level out at 50,000 feet, where the simulation ends. “Are you ready for the full simulation?” Swee asks. I have to think for a second. I’m dizzy and frightened and thoroughly exhausted. I want to will my way through it, but I also don’t want to puke in the centrifuge that my classmates paid good money to use. “No,” I say to Swee. And with that, I wash out as a citizen astronaut.

 

As my flight home roars down a runway at the Philadelphia airport, I find myself calculating my Gx (no more than two, I decide), and as we bank upward and then to the right, I can sense Gz creeping into the mix. I feel my blood being gently nudged toward my feet, although I know it’s not enough to take it away from my brain. 

Most important, I’m suddenly aware of the cocoon of technology that’s compensating for my body’s vulnerability to it all. Cabin pressurization is top of mind for me at the moment. Ten thousand feet, it turns out, isn’t just the altitude past which it’s okay to use portable electronic devices. It’s also the altitude at which passengers begin to require oxygen assistance. At our cruising altitude of 32,000 feet, no one on board could function for more than 15 seconds without the oxygen mix in our cabin. After that, we’d start to pass out and die. 

And yet I’m leaning back and turning on a movie, content that the systems around me will keep me alive. After all, millions of people have flown before me. 

Is that what it will take to establish confidence in private space travel? Millions of people going first? Hundreds of thousands? Thousands? It seems impossible, somehow, that the requisite number of volunteers are willing to risk nausea—or worse—to see the stars 62 miles closer than we can from the ground. Certainly, Wright and his group are undaunted, powered by a lifelong desire to experience space firsthand and aided by physical capabilities that I simply don’t have. I wish them the best. If successful, they’ll redefine what it means to have the right stuff—and hopefully pioneer a new citizen-space science in the process. But while their place may be in the stars, my place, I learned, is right here on Earth. 

 

Jacob Ward is the former editor-in-chief of Popular Science.  


    






Scientific Evidence That Walking While Texting Is Bad

$
0
0

Walking While Texting
Schabrun et. al

In New York, when people are texting while walking in front of me, I'm frequently overcome by rage. But since throwing people into the street is "assault" according to "the law," I abstain. However, people--come on.

In this study published in the online journal PLOS One, researchers used motion-capture software to assess the gaits of 26 healthy folks, with and without cellphone use. Here's the setup:

Individuals walked at a comfortable pace in a straight line over a distance of ~8.5 m while; 1) walking without the use of a phone, 2) reading text on a mobile phone, or 3) typing text on a mobile phone. Gait performance was evaluated using a three-dimensional movement analysis system. [Ed note: awesome.]

Eight cameras were set up to monitor the people walking while reading or texting (the phrase, sent on your standard QWERTY virtual keyboard, was "the quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog"). No surprise, the people reading or texting were slower, deviated from a straight line more, and on top of everything, didn't text very accurately. (The quikj bbrown fox jumpd etc. etc.)

Evaluation of gait performance revealed that individuals walk slower, demonstrate greater absolute medial-lateral step deviation, increase rotation ROM of the head with respect to the global reference frame, walk with a flexed head position, reduce neck ROM, and move the thorax and head more in-phase with reduced phase variability, during texting and reading than unconstrained walking. 

In short, reading a text or typing one while walking makes you dumb. It likely increases your chances of injury, the researchers suggest, and that's even without factoring in the injury your fellow pedestrians may give you.


    






Viewing all 20161 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images